[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] Stack handling



Juergen Goeritz wrote:
> No, it's not a stupid question at all. I had the same
> first thought when I read the posting. You may just
> have a need for a seperate stack for the scheduling
> handler.
> 
> JG
But why is a stack even needed? Since you have IRQ
vector tables why not fixed IRQ memory locations for
fast save/restore locations. With 64 bit addressing
you got room for a few words of memory for IRQ's. Really
how often is IRQ's nested?


-- 
Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/