[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] Stack handling
Juergen Goeritz wrote:
> No, it's not a stupid question at all. I had the same
> first thought when I read the posting. You may just
> have a need for a seperate stack for the scheduling
> handler.
>
> JG
But why is a stack even needed? Since you have IRQ
vector tables why not fixed IRQ memory locations for
fast save/restore locations. With 64 bit addressing
you got room for a few words of memory for IRQ's. Really
how often is IRQ's nested?
--
Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/