Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: Rep:Re: [f-cpu] Stack handling

[Juergen Goeritz <goeritz@oekomm.de>]

On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> For calling convention I've just realesed a draft about it in my folder
>
>I have read it, it's a good resume, and I have only one thing to say. Invert
>return address and stack pointer. Two reasons for this choice : on MIPS
>the return address is at the end of the register bank, so why not use the same
>idee. And if we need frame pointer, or some thing like that we will creat
>separate the pointer with an jump destination, and I think that's not clean.

Hi,

don't think this it's clever to copy this MIPS approach on a
processor that has no fixed number of registers by default.

JG

*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/