[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rep:[f-cpu] Another proposition for a call convention
- To: <f-cpu@seul.org>
- Subject: Rep:[f-cpu] Another proposition for a call convention
- From: "Nicolas Boulay" <nicolas.boulay@ifrance.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 10:58:24 GMT
- Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Delivery-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 06:58:32 -0400
- Reply-To: f-cpu@seul.org
- Send-By: 140.94.82.18 with Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt; FR 15/06/2000)
- Sender: owner-f-cpu@seul.org
-----Message d'origine-----
De: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
A: f-cpu@seul.org
Date: 07/06/02
Objet: [f-cpu] Another proposition for a call convention
R60 : return adress
R61 : global pointer
R62 : Frame pointer
R63 : stack pointer
>>> Must we obligatory have one unique stack pointer in C. I have read
somewhere that the dependancies on this register is really strong
(typical IPC jump far away without such pointer).
nicO
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/