[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [f-cpu] New suggestion about call convention


>De: Michael Riepe
<big snip>

>I have to admit that static (link-time) allocation and register masking
>together will probably do even better. It also depends very much on the
>code - the linker may have to take loops etc. into account when it selects
>the save/restore points. But in general, the `lazy save' algorithm
>I outlined above should work pretty well.

i second you.

>Now YG will probably ask again where I get `those crazy ideas' from...
>It's basically the same `register windowing' approach that SPARC and
>Itanium CPUs use - only in software.

how disapointing ! i thought you invented everything ;-P

(why reinvent the wheel when you can copy it, by the way ?)

> Michael "Tired" Riepe <Michael.Riepe@stud.uni-hannover.de>
> "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"


To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe f-cpu       in the body. http://f-cpu.seul.org/