Re: (FC-Devel) requirements

[Andrey V Khavryutchenko <akhavr@compchem.kiev.ua>]

Hi, Jeff! 

>>>>> "WJ" == Wolfe, Jeff writes:

WJ> I have to agree with Brenton on some of this.  I am currently doing a
WJ> lot of DCOM development, and there is a major benefit to having the
WJ> IDL.  It creates a very nice interface document.  I would be willing to
WJ> use one of the free corba implementations as long as there were no
WJ> major objections.  I suppose it would be easy enough to add bridges to
WJ> other technologies.

Ok.  Does anyone knows web-available IDL specifications for UML classes?

WJ> I also want to bring up a point that has been mentioned before.  I
WJ> would be strongly in favor of finding a way to use CVS as the ultimate
WJ> backend for information storage.  Since the repository and versioning
WJ> is already done there.  Any suggestions as to how this might impact the
WJ> requirements would be appreciated.

Agreed fully.

-- 
SY, Andrey V Khavryutchenko	http://www.kbi.kiev.ua/~akhavr

Shick's Law:
	There is no problem a good miracle can't solve.