[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[freehaven-cvs] correct related work, commit a new pdf



Update of /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/e2e-traffic
In directory moria.mit.edu:/home2/arma/work/freehaven/doc/e2e-traffic

Modified Files:
	e2e-traffic.pdf e2e-traffic.tex 
Log Message:
correct related work, commit a new pdf


Index: e2e-traffic.pdf
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/e2e-traffic/e2e-traffic.pdf,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -d -r1.1 -r1.2
Binary files /tmp/cvs2cev2b and /tmp/cvsgtRjhg differ

Index: e2e-traffic.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/e2e-traffic/e2e-traffic.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -d -r1.34 -r1.35
--- e2e-traffic.tex	25 Jan 2004 17:07:25 -0000	1.34
+++ e2e-traffic.tex	26 Jan 2004 02:42:16 -0000	1.35
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@
 recipient by wrapping messages in layers of public-key cryptography, and
 relaying them through a path composed of \emph{mixes}. Each mix in turn
 decrypts, delays, and re-orders messages, before relaying them toward their
-destinations.  Chaum proved the security of a mix against a \emph{passive
-  adversary} who eavesdrops on all communications but is unable to observe
-the reordering inside the mix.
+destinations. % Chaum proved the security of a mix against a \emph{passive
+%  adversary} who eavesdrops on all communications but is unable to observe
+%the reordering inside the mix.
 % This above statement is misleading, no? The proof only holds when
 % Alice sends always/only once, IIRC. -NM
 Because some mixes might be controlled by an

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs       in the body. http://freehaven.net/