[freehaven-cvs] a few more fixes, including a title change

[arma@seul.org (Roger Dingledine)]

Update of /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/sync-batching
In directory moria.mit.edu:/home2/arma/work/freehaven/doc/sync-batching

Modified Files:
	sync-batching.pdf sync-batching.tex 
Log Message:
a few more fixes, including a title change


Index: sync-batching.pdf
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/sync-batching/sync-batching.pdf,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -d -r1.14 -r1.15
Binary files /tmp/cvsH1nxEn and /tmp/cvsEs9DOD differ

Index: sync-batching.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/sync-batching/sync-batching.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -d -r1.47 -r1.48
--- sync-batching.tex	26 Jan 2004 17:16:17 -0000	1.47
+++ sync-batching.tex	27 Jan 2004 04:16:26 -0000	1.48
@@ -29,7 +29,8 @@
 
 \begin{document}
 %\title{The Disadvantages of Cascade Mix Networks and How to Overcome Them}
-\title{Synchronous Batching:\\From Cascade Networks to Free Routes
+%\title{Synchronous Batching:\\From Cascade Networks to Free Routes
+\title{Synchronous Batching:\\From Cascades to Free Routes
 %\title{Mixing in Step:\\Synchronous Batching from Cascade Networks to
 %  Free Routes
 %\title{Groove Mixing:\\Synchronous Batching from Cascade Networks to Free Routes
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@
 opportunities arise because the networks use a \emph{free-route}
 topology---one where the sender can choose the mixes that make up her
 message's path. They suggest instead a \emph{cascade network} topology,
-where all senders choose from a few fixed paths through the mix network.
+where all senders choose from a set of fixed paths through the mix network.
 
 %In this paper we argue that the cascade design resolves the attacks not
 %because of its network topology, but because of a property of its batching
@@ -101,7 +102,7 @@
 because it uses a \emph{synchronous batching} strategy, not because it
 uses a particular network topology. We show that synchronous batching
 prevents these attacks even when free routes are used. Further, we
-explore three topologies with synchronous batching---cascade, stratified
+explore three topologies with synchronous batching---cascades, stratified
 (a restricted-route hybrid topology), and free-route---and find that
 the free-route
 network provides the highest expected anonymity as well as the best
@@ -220,8 +221,8 @@
 links and controls many of the mixes. We consider each of their attacks
 below and find in each case that the arguments of \cite{disad-free-routes}
 do not apply if the free-route network is synchronous. Indeed, against
-some of attacks the free-route network is substantially stronger than
-the cascade.
+some of the attacks a free-route network is substantially stronger than
+the cascade network.
 
 {\bf{Position in mix route:}} This attack partitions messages that go
 through a given honest node based on how many hops each message has

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs       in the body. http://freehaven.net/