[freehaven-cvs] slight reorg

[feamster@seul.org (Nick Feamster)]

Update of /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/routing-zones
In directory moria.mit.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv14453

Modified Files:
	routing-zones.tex 
Log Message:
slight reorg



Index: routing-zones.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/routing-zones/routing-zones.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -d -r1.22 -r1.23
--- routing-zones.tex	27 Jan 2004 17:48:33 -0000	1.22
+++ routing-zones.tex	27 Jan 2004 17:56:36 -0000	1.23
@@ -769,31 +769,42 @@
 
 
 
+
+\section{Design Recommendations}
+
+In light of our analysis, which has shown that certain ASes have
+considerable easvesdropping capabilities on mix networks, we propose two
+recommendations with regard to mix network design.  First, mix networks
+should select paths with the underlying AS-level topology in mind.
+Second, mix networks should strive to deploy more nodes in locations
+with a large number of AS-level exit points.  
+
+\subsection{Explicit Consideration of AS-level Paths}
+
 \subsection{Improving Jurisdictional Independence with Node Placement}
-	B. How do these results change as we change our assumptions
-	   about the set of nodes from which you can select:
-	   
-	   - If you have 10 nodes in the US, where is the best place to
-	     have them?
 
-		hypothesis: there are about 10 "tier-1 ISPs".  maybe one
-		in each of those probably gives you sufficient set of
-		choices, without giving too much info away based on your
-		choices from the 10.
+where would you add nodes, if you had the choice? talk about internap.
 
-		an alternative approach would picking 10 very far-flung 
-		edge ISPs who have different upstreams, etc.  this may
-		work better, actually, though you do run the risk of
-		having each pairwise path go through 1 or 2 of the same
-		ISPs if you are not careful.
 
-	   - How much do transatlantic nodes help, etc?  i.e., Would you
-	     do anything differently if you had this option?
+%% 	B. How do these results change as we change our assumptions
+%% 	   about the set of nodes from which you can select:
+	   
+%% 	   - If you have 10 nodes in the US, where is the best place to
+%% 	     have them?
 
-\section{Design Recommendations}
+%% 		hypothesis: there are about 10 "tier-1 ISPs".  maybe one
+%% 		in each of those probably gives you sufficient set of
+%% 		choices, without giving too much info away based on your
+%% 		choices from the 10.
 
-	Given our observations, what design recommendations can we make
-	for systems like Tor re: node selection?
+%% 		an alternative approach would picking 10 very far-flung 
+%% 		edge ISPs who have different upstreams, etc.  this may
+%% 		work better, actually, though you do run the risk of
+%% 		having each pairwise path go through 1 or 2 of the same
+%% 		ISPs if you are not careful.
+
+%% 	   - How much do transatlantic nodes help, etc?  i.e., Would you
+%% 	     do anything differently if you had this option?
 
 \section{Conclusion}
 
@@ -809,7 +820,6 @@
 	well).
 %temporary spacer while we don't have a conclusion to make sure things
 %	don't look ridiculous, aesthetically
-\vspace{6in}
 
 %\section*{Acknowledgements}
 

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs       in the body. http://freehaven.net/