[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[freehaven-cvs] done (w/draft anyway)
Update of /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/routing-zones
In directory moria.mit.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv3009
Modified Files:
routing-zones.tex
Added Files:
endpoint-tables.tex
Log Message:
done (w/draft anyway)
roger can now work his magic on the presentation
--- NEW FILE: endpoint-tables.tex ---
%%\begin{table}
\begin{small}
%%\label{table:tor-network}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l|lp{2in}|l|l}
\multicolumn{5}{c}{{\bf Receivers and Senders used in Analysis}} \\
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Senders} & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Receivers} \\
\hline
Receiver & AS & & Sender & AS\\
\hline
www.fbi.gov & 3 & & Qwest & 209 \\
www.mit.edu & 3 & & AOL & 1668 \\
www.monster.com & 3 & & Earthlink & 4355 \\
www.whitehouse.gov & 3 & & Sprint & 4999 \\
www.cryptome.org & 2914 & & RCN & 6079 \\
www.norml.org & 2914 & & Verizon & 6995 \\
www.anonymizer.com & 4323 & & BellSouth & 12272 \\
www.cnn.com & 5662 & & Covad & 18566 \\
www.amazon.com & 7224 & & Cox & 22773 \\
www.aclu.org & 7784 & & Comcast & 22909 \\
www.aol.com & 10593 & & Speakeasy & 23504 \\
www.ebay.com & 11643 \\
www.hotmail.com & 12076 \\
www.hotornot.com & 12182 \\
www.dea.gov & 15130 \\
www.google.com & 15169 \\
www.yahoo.com & 17110 \\
www.indymedia.org & 22489 \\
www.geocities.com & 26101 \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{small}
%%\end{table}
Index: routing-zones.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/freehaven/cvsroot/doc/routing-zones/routing-zones.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -d -r1.29 -r1.30
--- routing-zones.tex 28 Jan 2004 06:38:47 -0000 1.29
+++ routing-zones.tex 28 Jan 2004 07:30:31 -0000 1.30
@@ -767,6 +767,63 @@
\subsection{Jurisdictional Attacks on Entry and Exit Paths}
+\begin{table}[t]
+\begin{scriptsize}
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{r|rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr}
+& \multicolumn{14}{c}{\bf Receiver} \\
+{\bf Sender} &3 & 2914 & 4323 & 5662 & 7224 & 7784 & 10593 & 11643 & 12076 & 12182 & 15130 & 15169 & 17110 & 22489 & 26101 \\\hline
+209& 0.11 &0.14 &{\bf 0.07} &0.17 &0.14 &{\bf 0.07} &0.17 &0.24 &{\bf 0.07} &0.15 &0.16 &{\bf 0.06} &0.22 &0.18 &0.19 \\
+1668& 0.15 &{\bf 0.05} &{\bf 0.06} &{\em 1.00} &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.08} &{\em 1.00} &{\bf 0.09} &0.12 &{\bf 0.07} &0.11 &{\bf 0.08} &0.19 &0.11 &0.19 \\
+4355& 0.21 &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.03} &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.08} &0.11 &0.14 &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.05} &0.10 &0.24 &0.11 &0.23 \\
+4999& {\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.03} &{\bf 0.03} &{\bf 0.04} &0.44 &{\bf 0.03} &{\bf 0.04} &0.23 &0.33 &0.11 &0.35 &{\bf 0.05} &0.12 &0.21 &0.45 \\
+6079& 0.35 &0.12 &0.17 &0.14 &{\bf 0.04} &0.21 &0.14 &0.19 &0.21 &0.12 &{\bf 0.08} &0.19 &0.37 &0.17 &0.33 \\
+6995& 0.14 &0.10 &{\bf 0.06} &0.11 &{\bf 0.06} &{\bf 0.06} &0.11 &0.16 &0.12 &0.10 &{\bf 0.07} &0.10 &0.22 &0.12 &0.21 \\
+18566& 0.74 &0.24 &0.29 &0.27 &{\bf 0.08} &0.25 &0.27 &0.35 &0.40 &0.24 &0.19 &0.35 &0.75 &0.33 &0.65 \\
+22773& 0.41 &0.14 &0.20 &0.16 &{\bf 0.05} &0.14 &0.16 &0.21 &0.23 &0.14 &{\bf 0.09} &0.24 &0.43 &0.19 &0.37 \\
+22909& 0.16 &{\bf 0.05} &0.11 &{\bf 0.09} &0.48 &0.20 &{\bf 0.09} &{\bf 0.09} &0.10 &0.29 &0.14 &0.11 &0.19 &0.42 &0.17 \\
+23504& 0.14 &{\bf 0.08} &0.11 &0.10 &{\bf 0.05} &{\bf 0.05} &0.10 &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.09} &{\bf 0.09} &0.38 &{\bf 0.09} &0.18 &0.12 &0.16 \\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\end{scriptsize}
+\caption{Jurisdictional independence for typical sending and receiving
+ ASes through the Tor anonymity network topology. Each table entry
+ shows, for a sending and receiving AS pair, the probability that a single
+ AS will observe both the path from the sender to the entry node and
+ the path from the exit node to the receiver. Names for each AS are
+ listed in Appendix~\ref{sec:send_recv}.}
+\label{tab:as_obs_ee_tor}
+\end{table}
+
+\begin{table}[t]
+\begin{scriptsize}
+\begin{center}
+\begin{tabular}{r|rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr}
+& \multicolumn{14}{c}{\bf Receiver} \\
+&3 & 2914 & 4323 & 5662 & 7224 & 7784 & 10593 & 11643 & 12076 & 12182 & 15130 & 15169 & 17110 & 22489 & 26101 \\\hline
+209& 0.25 &{\bf 0.05} &{\bf 0.06} &0.12 &0.10 &0.13 &0.12 &0.18 &0.17 &0.11 &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.09} &0.21 &0.14 &0.18 \\
+1668& 0.26 &0.11 &{\bf 0.09} &{\em 1.00} &0.14 &0.13 &{\em 1.00} &0.18 &0.21 &0.15 &0.12 &0.10 &0.23 &0.18 &0.23 \\
+4355& 0.11 &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.05} &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.09} &0.10 &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.09} &{\bf 0.07} &0.12 &{\bf 0.08} &0.11 \\
+4999& 0.15 &0.17 &0.15 &0.20 &0.36 &0.10 &0.20 &0.29 &0.32 &0.22 &0.42 &0.12 &0.15 &0.28 &0.36 \\
+6079& 0.46 &{\bf 0.08} &{\bf 0.07} &0.13 &{\bf 0.05} &0.14 &0.13 &0.26 &0.31 &0.14 &{\bf 0.06} &0.12 &0.37 &0.16 &0.35 \\
+6995& 0.42 &{\bf 0.05} &{\bf 0.07} &0.14 &{\bf 0.04} &0.12 &0.14 &0.24 &0.28 &0.13 &{\bf 0.08} &0.10 &0.33 &0.16 &0.31 \\
+18566& {\em 0.97} &{\bf 0.09} &0.13 &0.19 &{\bf 0.06} &0.20 &0.19 &0.48 &0.63 &0.26 &0.12 &0.22 &0.72 &0.32 &0.70 \\
+22773& 0.50 &{\bf 0.09} &{\bf 0.09} &0.17 &{\bf 0.05} &0.11 &0.17 &0.27 &0.35 &0.14 &0.10 &0.14 &0.38 &0.18 &0.38 \\
+22909& 0.11 &0.17 &0.18 &0.20 &0.47 &0.34 &0.20 &{\bf 0.09} &0.11 &0.24 &0.14 &{\bf 0.08} &0.11 &0.36 &0.12 \\
+23504& 0.12 &{\bf 0.07} &{\bf 0.05} &{\bf 0.09} &0.10 &{\bf 0.06} &{\bf 0.09} &0.13 &0.14 &0.13 &0.33 &{\bf 0.06} &0.14 &0.14 &0.15 \\
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
+\end{scriptsize}
+\caption{Jurisdictional independence for typical sending and receiving
+ ASes through the Mixmaster anonymity network topology. Each table
+ entry shows, for a sending and receiving AS pair, the probability that
+ a single AS will observe both the path from the sender to the entry
+ node and the path from the exit node to the receiver. Names for each
+ AS are listed in Appendix~\ref{sec:send_recv}.}
+\label{tab:as_obs_ee_mm}
+\end{table}
+
+
To discover the jurisdictional independence of the entry and exit paths
for typical mix networks, we used the lists of common sender and receiver
locations from Appendix~\ref{sec:send_recv} and modeled typical paths
@@ -796,6 +853,13 @@
because many Internet paths cross tier-1 ISPs, a careless sender is
likely to be eavesdropped by a single AS at both entry and exit.
+Interestingly, these tables also show that jurisdictional independence
+is high when either the sender, the receiver, or both are located in a
+tier-1 ISP (e.g., AS 4999, which is associated with Sprint). This might
+be because the path from the sender to the entry point is already
+located in a tier-1 ISP, and thus will not have to cross other tier-1
+ISPs en route to the entry point; this result deserves further
+exploration.
\section{Design Recommendations and Future Work}\label{sec:design}
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@seul.org with
unsubscribe freehaven-cvs in the body. http://freehaven.net/