[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

gEDA-cvs: CVS update: irclog_sprint_20070421.txt



  User: ahvezda 
  Date: 07/06/07 23:12:34

  Added:       .        irclog_sprint_20070421.txt
  Log:
  Misc website updates (long overdue a checking)
  
  
  
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.1                  eda/geda/website/sprints/irclog_sprint_20070421.txt
  
  Index: irclog_sprint_20070421.txt
  ===================================================================
  00:04 -!- Igor2 [~igor2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  01:20 -!- robfitz [~robfitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Ping timeout: 620 seconds]
  01:20 -!- robfitz [~robfitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  01:31 < Igor2> hi
  01:47 -!- nwk [~nwk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  01:54 < Igor2> hi
  01:57 < nwk> hi
  02:32 -!- bert [~bert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  02:42 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  02:57 -!- cory [~cory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  02:57 < cory> quit
  02:57 -!- cory [~cory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Client Quit]
  03:11 -!- corycross [~coryrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  03:12 -!- corycross [~coryrc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Client Quit]
  03:14 -!- corycrossq [~cory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  03:16 < peterbrett> *blink*
  03:24 < Igor2> blink?
  03:32 < peterbrett> cory's in-and-outness
  03:32 < peterbrett> Ales: If you're listening, could you please kick seul.org to refresh the MX record for peter-b.co.uk?
  03:33 < peterbrett> Ales: My mailserver died yesterday, and I've moved to a new provider
  04:01 < corycrossq> Couldn't find the right irc client I used to use...
  04:02 -!- corycrossq [~cory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has left #geda []
  04:02 -!- corycrossq [~cory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  04:27 -!- cnieves [~cnieves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  04:27 < cnieves> hi everybody
  04:28 < peterbrett> hey cnieves 
  04:29 < cnieves> hi Peter
  04:30 < cnieves> the code sprint seems to be running since a long time... ;) did I miss something?
  04:30 < peterbrett> No, it'll start about 2 pm GMT, I think
  04:31 < peterbrett> I'll be going to PeterC's place for lunch and to start the UK leg of the sprint :)
  04:31 < cnieves> That's the official US start time ;) . 
  04:31 < cnieves> Nice! food and coding! :)
  04:32 < peterbrett> My e-mail is still screwed; I think seul.org hasn't realized that the MX records for my domain have changed
  04:33 < cnieves> isn't that a dns thing? maybe the dns it is using has not updated its tables... 
  04:33 < peterbrett> cnieves: That's right, yes
  04:34 < cnieves> Hard thing to solve if you don't have access to the dns... Don't know if Ales can do something.
  04:35 < peterbrett> Also, the fscking git system keeps screwing up
  04:36 < cnieves> what is it doing?
  04:37 < peterbrett> Skipping commits
  04:37 < cnieves> :-o why?
  04:37 < peterbrett> http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~ptbb2/gitweb.cgi?p=gaf.git;a=summary
  04:38 < peterbrett> Missing a couple of commits from yesterday, and I have no idea why
  04:40 < cnieves> yup, I saw them in the mail. You can talk to Ales when he comes
  04:42 < cnieves> I'll take a look at your patch, and apply it, complying with Ales' comments (I will comment the code to fetch the wiki from the web)
  04:42 < cnieves> there is no file in SF tracker
  04:42 < cnieves> should I take it from the mail?
  04:42 < Igor2> >peter> so, can you find a way that i can fetch the commit info without having a local repository?
  04:45 < peterbrett> cnieves: Yes, from the mail
  04:46 < peterbrett> Igor2: Some ways have occurred to me, but I'm just feeling pissed of with cvsps atm
  04:47 < Igor2> ok 
  04:52 < peterbrett> Igor2: Screenscraping seemed to be the best option
  04:58 < Igor2> i didn't get to compile the CVS version yet - that night when i tried my friend took my resources with his kernel patch problem :)
  04:58 < Igor2> but as soon as i've etched these boards
  04:58 < Igor2> i will set up that compile environment
  04:59 < Igor2> then i will have binaries compiled for i586, probably in .deb format with an easy and semi-automatic update :)
  05:05 < Igor2> bah, my etchant is a bit tired :)
  05:12 < cnieves> Peterbrett: I notice your gschem-browse-wiki patch won't work under windows...
  05:12 < cnieves> isn't there a way to make it working?
  05:12 < cnieves> (revert back to the current behaviour?)
  05:12 < peterbrett> cnieves: Why won't it work?
  05:13 < peterbrett> cnieves: The current behaviour is exactly the same
  05:13 < peterbrett> cnieves: Look at initiate-gschemdoc in i_callbacks.c
  05:13 < cnieves> you have an #ifndef MINGW ... fork() #else "Documentation commands not supported under MinGW"
  05:13 < peterbrett> cnieves: fork() is a point of very much contention in Linux<->Windows portability
  05:13 < peterbrett> cnieves: Yes, I remember now
  05:14 < peterbrett> cnieves: fork()-ing gschemdoc hasn't ever worked on Windows
  05:15 < cnieves> is the current behaviour a fork too?
  05:15 < peterbrett> cnieves: yep
  05:15 < peterbrett> cnieves: The "fix" is to use CreateProcess() from the Windows API
  05:15 < peterbrett> Because O*(&%(*&"££*$& Microsoft can't implement the POSIX specification
  05:16 < peterbrett> We should probably do something with autoconf & missing
  05:16 < cnieves> yup, they prefer their own api. Then I suppose there is no problem.
  05:17 < cnieves> it's a big deal the windows users won't have access to help pages... :)
  05:18 < peterbrett> cnieves: Yep. It does need fixing, but I don't want to plough through MSDN pages for fear of my brain dribbling out of my ears
  05:29 -!- pcjc2 [~pcjc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  05:29 < pcjc2> hi all
  05:30 < cnieves> hi Peter
  05:30 < cnieves> welcome!
  05:32 < cnieves> pcjc2: do you plan to apply your patches in SF tracker?
  05:33 < pcjc2> I hoped to see what people thought of the new-page cleanup first
  05:36 < pcjc2> I'll apply the circle drawing one, and the minor tidyup one
  05:37 < cnieves> ok. Ask for the other when all people come. I generally assume that if there are no comments, there is no objection to the patch.
  05:38 < pcjc2> I don't think its too controversial
  05:38 < peterbrett> Who feels like a big crack-down on #ifdef DEBUG sections?
  05:39 < pcjc2> and it "works for me", It just doesn't hurt to get another few pairs of eyes to look at it when you essentially re-write a bit of code
  05:39 < peterbrett> (along a similar vein to my destruction of GTK1.2 support last year)
  05:39 < pcjc2> (In this case, the code which opens files from the command line)
  05:40 < pcjc2> if it doesn't compile with #define DEBUG 1 somewhere, then cull them I say
  05:40 < pcjc2> OTOH, there are some places where they (or statements like them) are helpful
  05:40 < pcjc2> )
  05:40 < peterbrett> It would be a good idea to define a macro (e.g. DEBUGMSG() ) for print debug info
  05:40 < pcjc2> bah can't match (), you see why I hate Scheme!
  05:40 < pcjc2> sure, is there a GLib way
  05:41 < peterbrett> pcjc2: If you're using emacs to edit scheme, there's a keystroke to close all open parentheses
  05:41 < pcjc2> there is a Kernel way, if you look at its sources
  05:41 < pcjc2> you could define such a DEBUGMSG() macro in similar vein to fprintf( stderr, ... )m
  05:42 < pcjc2> s/m$/ with a variadic marco/
  05:42 < peterbrett> pcjc2: Yes, but variadic macros *are* slightly evil
  05:42 < pcjc2> you probably should have a replacement if variadic macros don't work - a function taking varargs
  05:43 < peterbrett> yes
  05:43 < pcjc2> your DEBUGMSG wants to be a macro
  05:43 < pcjc2> and if it is to have printf syntax, either you must use variadic macros
  05:43 < pcjc2> or just define DEBUGMSG to expand somehow, without taking parameters
  05:44 < pcjc2> like #define DEBUGMSG printf
  05:44 < pcjc2> OR #define DEBUGMSG \\
  05:44 < pcjc2> no - thats broken anyway - ignore me
  05:44 < peterbrett> pcjc2: My pleasure
  05:45 < cnieves> help->component is not working for me, neither in the last gschem release. Could you please verify it?
  05:45 < peterbrett> cnieves: Um.. a testcase would be useful
  05:45 < pcjc2> I can't see how to do it without a variadic macro, or a macro which expands directly into a function call - must be one of the two
  05:45 < cnieves> easy: open gschem, go to the menu help->component... in the last gschem release
  05:47 < pcjc2> don't you have selected a component with a documentation reference?
  05:47 < cnieves> oh! forget it! I didnt't!
  05:48 < peterbrett> :) lol
  05:48 < peterbrett> And there's me blowing away my build tree to compile a released version
  05:49 < pcjc2> if its just over a component with no documentation link, IIRC, it googles for the device name
  05:49 < pcjc2> (But I'm just remembering what I think I saw one late night here.... not trying it live)
  05:50 < cnieves> no, it just does nothing
  05:50 < peterbrett> cnieves: That may be a bug
  05:50 < cnieves> yup. A message should be better
  05:51 < cnieves> peterc: have you seen ivan's mail?
  05:53 < peterbrett> Hmm
  05:53 < peterbrett> I think I need to install CVS Emacs
  05:57 < pcjc2> yes - just mailing back
  05:57 < pcjc2> feeling stupid pointing him to my patch in the tracker when I'd forgotten to upload that one
  05:57 < pcjc2> Also, briefly explaining the scheme defined menus
  05:58 < pcjc2> rcstrings.c
  05:58 < peterbrett> grep -Lr --include='*.[ch]' '#ifdef DEBUG' * | wc -l
  05:58 < cnieves> why not invite him to IRC?
  05:58 < peterbrett> only 343 files have #ifdef DEBUGs in
  05:58 < pcjc2> I guess that is I18N, but I can't figure out how / where they are referenced
  05:58 < pcjc2> good point, will send that email now
  06:00 < peterbrett> ...oops, I needed the -l switch to grep, not -L
  06:00 < peterbrett> 20 matches seems more reasonable
  06:00 < peterbrett> most of them are in gattrib
  06:01 < peterbrett> 81 files have occurrences of 'DEBUG'
  06:01 < pcjc2> I'd not suggest removing them from gattrib without checking with Stuart
  06:01 < peterbrett> pcjc2
  06:01 < peterbrett> meh
  06:01 < peterbrett> I agree
  06:01 < peterbrett> I'm going to pack up here and head over to your place now
  06:02 < pcjc2> ok
  06:02 < cnieves> peterbrett: I applied your patch to the help menu
  06:02 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  06:02 < cnieves> doh! just when he leaves! :(
  06:27 < cnieves> pcjc2: do you know a strstr function that is case insensitive?
  06:32 < pcjc2> strcasestr
  06:32 < cnieves> thanks!
  06:32 < pcjc2> grr... some horrid person took my laundry out of the dryer last night and put their own in - before mine was finished
  06:32 < pcjc2> (Either that, or the dryer isn't working as well as it used to)
  06:33 < cnieves> innocence assumption first, unless you have evidences ;)
  06:41 < pcjc2> Peter B says strcasestr isn't portable to windows
  06:42 < cnieves> :(
  06:43 < pcjc2> He recalls a discussion with you, regarding that, and portability to Cygwin
  06:43 < pcjc2> (Will be online soon, wireless permitting)
  06:46 < cnieves> Can't remeber. I'm looking for a more portable way.
  06:48 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  06:48 < peterbrett> 'lo
  06:48 < cnieves> hi again
  06:50 < pcjc2> Having googled for it, I'm not sure if it is a problem on windows
  06:50 < pcjc2> the compare functions are
  06:50 < cnieves> found a workaround: use g_ascii_strup in both strings, and continue using strstr afterwards.
  06:55 < cnieves> pcjc2: what compare functions did you find?
  06:57 < pcjc2> that is less postable
  06:57 < pcjc2> windows does something different
  06:57 < pcjc2> just google for windows strcasecmp portability
  07:00 < cnieves> we are not talking about strcasecmp, but strcasestr
  07:00 < peterbrett> Gah, the universe is doing everything to stop my mail from working at the moment :(
  07:00 < pcjc2> windows claims to support strcasestr
  07:02 < cnieves> strcasestr is not in mingw's string.h:
  07:02 < cnieves> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/mingw/include/string.h?rev=1.16&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src
  07:03 < cnieves> but it is in cygwin:
  07:03 < cnieves> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/include/strings.h?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src
  07:04 < cnieves> no, it's not in cygwin either. I mispelled it with strcasecmp
  07:04 < cnieves> I think it's better to replace strcasestr
  07:05 < cnieves> and use g_ascii_strup and strstr
  07:15  * peterbrett hates CVS
  07:16 < cnieves> peterbrett: I couldn't apply parts #4 and #5 of your patch:
  07:17 < cnieves> I didn't change help-manual behaviour: I kept the old function because it is using "gschemdoc -m"
  07:18 < cnieves> and your new scheme function is using always "gschemdoc -w"
  07:18 < cnieves> I didn't apply #5 because we will lost all cvs history. I'll wait for Ales and see if he can do anything better.
  07:19 < cnieves> (#5 is moving gschemdoc from utils/scripts to gschem/scripts)
  07:19 < peterbrett> cnieves: There isn't anyway of doing it better that won't cause breakage
  07:19 < peterbrett> CVS sucks
  07:20 < cnieves> regarding #4: won't be better if "-w" is also a parameter of the gschemdoc scheme function ?
  07:20 < peterbrett> Peter C says you can do evil with CVS admin.  This is true, but it'll make it impossible to get historical pre-move versions of the tree
  07:20 < peterbrett> cnieves: I had a thought about that, and decided no
  07:20 < peterbrett> cnieves: Because they do totally different things
  07:21 < peterbrett> cnieves: I like functions to do what you expect them to
  07:21 < peterbrett> In fact, gschemdoc should be changed to use -d for finding component documentation
  07:22 < peterbrett> Just incase someone sets the documentation attribute of a symbol to -m or -w
  07:23 < cnieves> Another possibility is the toplevel manual being also a wiki page. Do you know how is it created?
  07:23 < peterbrett> No
  07:25 < cnieves> I'll wait for Ales and check this.
  07:25 < peterbrett> Good idea
  07:30 < cnieves> pcjc2: I recall you updated the refdes renum tests to remove the colos in filenames. Did you?
  07:30 < cnieves> (I can't confirm it in ChangeLog)
  07:30 < cnieves> s/colos/colons
  07:30 < pcjc2> Was Dan
  07:30 < pcjc2> Oh.. that last bug you closed... case insensitivity
  07:31 < cnieves> ah, ok. There is a bug report about this.
  07:31 < pcjc2> I recognise the name of the reporter.. an acquaintance from caving at Cambridge!
  07:32 < peterbrett> brb folks, we're off for lunch
  07:32 < cnieves> see you!
  07:33 < cnieves> pcjc2: the world is small! :)
  07:38 < peterbrett> right, pcjc2 is assembling food
  07:38 < peterbrett> So I've come back to talk
  07:39 < cnieves> :)
  07:39 < peterbrett> cnieves: If we were switching to a different VCS, is there any particular ones you like/don't like?
  07:41 < cnieves> don't have any preference
  07:42 < cnieves> My wish list is: easy to use, powerful (specially when moving/renaming), and don't need net access to manage small commits locally, being able to commit a set of them later.
  07:42 < peterbrett> So, not CVS then ;)
  07:42 < cnieves> right! :)
  07:56 < cnieves> pcjc2: could you update bug #1700444? (I think your last commit fixes it)
  07:57 < pcjc2> I filed that after the patch
  07:57 < pcjc2> it doesn't fix it
  07:58 < cnieves> ok
  07:58 < peterbrett> cnieves: I carefully wrote my commit message in "nice" format
  07:58 < peterbrett> And you screwed it up :(
  07:58 < peterbrett> http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf.git?a=commit;h=f693b0a793e92c7208d3cfe655f641c6994018bf
  08:01 < cnieves> Sorry. I tried to keep it "nice"... how would you prefer it? (I know it's too late for this one, but not for the next ones)
  08:01 < peterbrett> One (short) line summary, one line gap, detailed explanation
  08:02 < peterbrett> It means when you have a view like http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf.git?a=shortlog;h=f693b0a793e92c7208d3cfe655f641c6994018bf it's easy to see what's going on
  08:03 < peterbrett> So stuff like the patch submitter's name, the files affected etc should go in the detailed explanation (which should be as long as necessary)
  08:04 < cnieves> ok. I'll try to make the description shorter next time (and put the one line gap afterwards, I didn't know this was needed)
  08:04 < peterbrett> It's not needed, but it helps (I think of it as the "title" of the patch)
  08:04 < pcjc2> I'll look into fixing #170044
  08:04 < peterbrett> And I write it as if I was writing the Subject: field of an e-mail
  08:05 < cnieves> ok
  08:05 < cnieves> (I'm new to the git stuff, so be kind ;) )
  08:05 < peterbrett> Sorry
  08:06 < peterbrett> Actually, one of my biggest grievances at the moment is ChangeLog files
  08:06 < pcjc2> I still fail to write most of my commit messages in that format - its not just you
  08:06 < peterbrett> Which I like to whinge about to anyone who I can persuade to listen ;)
  08:07 < cnieves> there should be some specification like: first line should be no longer than ... characters (and the commit program checking that, of course)...
  08:08 < peterbrett> yes, there should
  08:09 < peterbrett> But actually, if we did switch to git, there wouldn't **be** a commit program
  08:09 < peterbrett> Because you'd commit locally, and then other people would "pull" your changes from you
  08:09 < cnieves> * cnieves still learning git
  08:10 < cnieves> if you have some spare time, you can try new attribute autoplacement code (still disable by default)
  08:12 < cnieves> (look for "Autoplace component/net/buses text attributes hook" in system-gschemrc)
  08:13 < pcjc2> will do in a bit - just drilling into #170044
  08:13 < pcjc2> (Digs down and hits a can of worms)
  08:13 < cnieves> take care they don't bite you! ;)
  08:13 < pcjc2> in m_basic.c, the function "visible" "
  08:13 < pcjc2>  *  This function checks if a given bounding box is visible on the screen."
  08:14 < pcjc2> it doesn't specify what the guaranteed, or expected semantics of the function are. It tries lots of permutations of clipping 
  08:15 < peterbrett> cnieves: Sorry for not helping, I'm busy writing http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:version_control_migration
  08:15 < cnieves> don't know about that one, sorry. I'm going off for lunch.
  08:15 < peterbrett> Okay, see you later
  08:16 < cnieves> see you!
  08:40 < peterbrett> pcjc2: http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers.html
  09:02 < mcmahill> peter:  you can complain to me since I didn't update the utils changelog yesterday when I touched about 25 files
  09:05 < mcmahill> anyone know of a way to automatically generate the ChangeLog entry prior to the commit so it can be checked in at the same time?  
  09:05 < mcmahill> I'm not a fan of manually creating the entries because of the opportunity for error.
  09:05 < peterbrett> Yeah, it's difficult
  09:06 < peterbrett> I'm busy writing some proposals to change the way we do version control & change logging
  09:06 < peterbrett> http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:version_control_migration
  09:06 -!- sdb [~sdb@xxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  09:06 < peterbrett> hi sdb 
  09:06 < sdb> Hi guys
  09:06 < peterbrett> looks like we're getting going
  09:06 < peterbrett> What's the situation in sunny MA?
  09:06 < sdb> DJ and I are at MIT.  
  09:07 -!- ivan [~ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  09:07 < peterbrett> pcjc2 & I are at his place
  09:07 < sdb> It's sunny today ... the first time in many months
  09:07 < peterbrett> ivan: hi there
  09:07 < peterbrett> It's lovely and warm here
  09:07 < ivan> hi 
  09:07 < sdb> Hi Peter!  Hi Peter!  How's the other Cambridge?
  09:07 < sdb> Hi Ivan
  09:07 < ivan> hi sdb
  09:07 < pcjc2> Sunny out, looks like a lovely day
  09:07 < peterbrett> Is Ales going to be joining us?
  09:08 < peterbrett> sdb: http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:version_control_migration
  09:09 < mcmahill> hi stuart, ivan
  09:09 < ivan> hi Dan
  09:09 < mcmahill> I'm only partially here today
  09:09 < pcjc2> Fixed #170044, was a > < vs < > type thing
  09:10 < pcjc2> Looks like it was in prior to the noscreen
  09:10 < pcjc2> "top" is the smallest y coordinate numerically, and is infact the bottom of the screen in world coords. That fact has caused me no end of hastle.
  09:11 < ivan> is there any plan on moving to a new source code control system?
  09:12 < peterbrett> ivan: Yes, I'm trying to put together a good argument for moving to git
  09:12 < peterbrett> http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf.git
  09:12 < ivan> yes, I saw that
  09:12 < peterbrett> This is based on an export from CVS, but it has its problems
  09:12 < peterbrett> e.g. the CVS exporter randomly dropped a commit last night
  09:12 < peterbrett> I'm going to try and reinstate it at some point
  09:13 < peterbrett> (probably this afternoon)
  09:13 < pcjc2> I propose a global rename "left, top, right, bottom" to "xmin, ymin, xmax, ymax"
  09:13 < ivan> I hope we'll make the move soon since CVS really can't compete with git or hg
  09:14 < peterbrett> quite
  09:14 < peterbrett> Do you have any preference as to which?
  09:14 < peterbrett> I really like git
  09:14 < peterbrett> It's very UNIX-y ;)
  09:14 < pcjc2> Ivan: I've not put that patch in the tracker yet, sorry. Will do so asap
  09:14 < ivan> well, I used hg extensively
  09:15 < ivan> but I have no problem with git either
  09:15 < ivan> git or hg, it doesn't really matter, as long as it's not CVS :)
  09:15 < peterbrett> :)
  09:21 < mcmahill> hmmm.  looks like I need to add git to pkgsrc if there is any chance of us moving to it
  09:22 -!- dj [~dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  09:23 < peterbrett> mcmahill: It should compile pretty painlessly
  09:23 < peterbrett> If there is pain, please let me know
  09:27 < pcjc2> Ivan: I uploaded the patch, http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1704834&group_id=161080&atid=818428
  09:27 < pcjc2> If anyone wants to review this patch before I commit, I'd appreciate it
  09:27 < pcjc2> (When Ales arrives, I hope he'll read it)
  09:33 < cnieves> hi everybody, and welcome those who arrived recently! :)
  09:33 < peterbrett> wb cnieves 
  09:33 < dj> Beep!
  09:33 < ivan> everyone, is there a coding style guide or something like that? what settings do you use for geda coding? 
  09:34 < peterbrett> I use Emacs' default C coding settings
  09:34 < peterbrett> Generally, tabs == bad
  09:34 < peterbrett> 2 spaces indentation
  09:34 < pcjc2> The project is fairly agnostic towards coding style - but its nice to keep consistent with whatever file you edit
  09:34 < ivan> that depends on the source file you're working on :)
  09:35  * peterbrett was talking about C
  09:35 < ivan> like in x_menus.c, there are 3 space indents
  09:35 < pcjc2> I am just looking over the patch I posted... it has lots of white-space fixes 
  09:35 < peterbrett> ivan: But most importantly, no whitespace changes in patches!
  09:35  * peterbrett glares at pcjc2 
  09:35 < ivan> LOL :)
  09:36 < pcjc2> not generally great to combine those with real patches, but the functions didn't indent properly otherwise
  09:36 < pcjc2> 3 space indents not good
  09:36 < pcjc2> Ales doesn't mind us fixing white-space errors like tabs and indentation
  09:37 < ivan> perhaps it should be useful to compile a set of small guidelines and then check all the sources for consistency?
  09:37 < dj> the rule should be "what indent does"
  09:38 < ivan> but what options would you pass to indent?
  09:39 < peterbrett> --gnu :D :D :D
  09:40 < ivan> alright, I'll keep that in mind when creating patches ;)
  09:40 < peterbrett> It's most important that it is *clear* what is being changed
  09:41 < pcjc2> you might find one sourcefile complies
  09:41 < pcjc2> /dev/null
  09:41 < peterbrett> *Read* your diffs.  Try to make sure that you understand what you've done just by looking at the commit message & the diff.
  09:42 < dj> Just "indent" - no options.  It defaults to --gnu
  09:43 < mcmahill> dj:  depends on which indent you have
  09:43 < pcjc2> PCB uses --gnu
  09:43 < dj> Well, the gnu one ;-)
  09:43 < Ales> the only coding standard is following the existing code standard
  09:43 < pcjc2> but many of the gEDA people dislike its {} handling (speaking for me, and I think Ales)
  09:43 < peterbrett> Ales!!!!
  09:43 < dj> Which one?
  09:44 < peterbrett> Ales: That's the MicroSoft argument. "But the source code **is** the documentation!"
  09:44 < Ales> or do whatever emacs does
  09:44 < mcmahill> I' m not a fan of gnu { }.  I want the { to be on the same line as the if()  but I can deal
  09:44 < Ales> or I might just mandate use the gnu standard.
  09:44 < Ales> either way, it's a religious discussion
  09:45 < peterbrett> Ales: I think that what we've got at the moment works, so let's just potter along merrily
  09:45 < pcjc2> Ales: My page_creation_cleanup.diff patch (now actually in the tracker) fixes bugs when creating pages
  09:45 < Ales> I'm not sold on using git, unless somebody can quantify the bandwidth requirements
  09:46 < Ales> I saw, lots of changes.. are those all code changes or just whitespace changes?
  09:46 < pcjc2> but having re-read it, its not a particularly nice patch - it fixes lots of white-space bugs around the functions it touches
  09:46 < pcjc2> stuff wasn't indented properly at all in many of those files
  09:46 < Ales> okay, that's okay to fix
  09:46 < pcjc2> The biggest chunk was majorly unreadable
  09:46 < Ales> which chunk was that?
  09:47 < pcjc2> in DEFINE_I_CALLBACK(hierarchy_down_schematic)
  09:47 < pcjc2> a very long function started with:
  09:47 < pcjc2> );
  09:47 < pcjc2> -  if (object != NULL) {
  09:47 < pcjc2> -    /* only allow going into symbols */
  09:47 < pcjc2> -    if (object->type == OBJ_COMPLEX) {
  09:47 < pcjc2> ·
  09:47 < pcjc2> so two levels of indentation for the whole tihng
  09:47 < pcjc2> I replaced with:
  09:47 < pcjc2> +  /* only allow going into symbols */
  09:47 < pcjc2> +  if (object == NULL || object->type != OBJ_COMPLEX)
  09:47 < pcjc2> +    return;
  09:47 < pcjc2> and dropped some indentation for readability
  09:48 < pcjc2> which is at least partly why it looks like that function has a lot of changes
  09:48 < Ales> yeah, that looks fine
  09:48 < pcjc2> I think I'll review it again with Meld, as the diff is a pain to read in this case
  09:49 < peterbrett> Ales, each initial checkout ~17.5 MB
  09:49 < Ales> ouch
  09:49 < peterbrett> This includes the entire history
  09:50 < Ales> git is pretty darn different than cvs
  09:50 < Ales> svn is far close to cvs
  09:50 < peterbrett> Don't forget that after that the updates are really small
  09:50 < Ales> hmmm
  09:50 < peterbrett> Especially if you're running git-daemon
  09:50 < peterbrett> Plus, you have the bonus of not having the server hammered when someone wants to run blame on a file
  09:51 < peterbrett> Or get log history
  09:51 < Ales> true
  09:51 < peterbrett> Ales: If we use git, we should make nightly tarballs available
  09:51 < Ales> that 17.5MB will grow as the history groes
  09:51 < Ales> why?
  09:51 < peterbrett> Ales: yes
  09:51 < Ales> I'm trying to reduce bandwidth, not increase it
  09:52 < peterbrett> Ales: Oh yeah, good point
  09:52 < peterbrett> Then we shouldn't ;)
  09:52 < Ales> but why should we do tarballs?  what's the advantage?
  09:52 < peterbrett> I was thinking that people who don't want to do development could use them
  09:53 < peterbrett> But then I realized that was a stupid suggestions
  09:53 < peterbrett> s/s$//
  09:53 < mcmahill> argh!
  09:53 < peterbrett> ?
  09:54 < mcmahill> stupid git build system !#*$*&#
  09:54 < peterbrett> what's it done?
  09:54 < Ales> you are building git?
  09:54 < mcmahill> peter:  hard codes CC=gcc, and I suspect it is downhill from there...
  09:54 < mcmahill> Ales:  tried, failed.
  09:54 < peterbrett> Um, do CC=cc make
  09:54 < Ales> hmmm.
  09:54 < mcmahill> I'll see if it can be fixed
  09:56 < mcmahill> it redefines wcwidth
  09:57 < peterbrett> Is that a problem?
  09:57 < Ales> how much effort did the git developers put into getting it to run everywhere?
  09:58 < mcmahill> it causes a compile error
  09:58 < mcmahill> Please look at the
  09:58 < mcmahill>    top of the Makefile to see what can be adjusted for your needs.
  09:58 < Ales> why aren't they using autotools?
  09:58 < peterbrett> They don't like autotools
  09:58 < peterbrett> mcmahill: What system are you trying compile it on?
  09:59 < Ales> I bet it's either netbsd or solaris
  09:59 < Ales> more likely solaris :)
  09:59 < mcmahill> yes, netbsd
  09:59 < Ales> ah darn
  09:59 < mcmahill> no, my solaris box is busy building firefox2...
  10:00 < mcmahill> anyway, I gotta run out for a bit.  I'll beat on git a bit later
  10:00 < Ales> dan: let me know what you think of it
  10:00 < peterbrett> mcmahill: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/12077.html
  10:00 < peterbrett> Ales: mercurial is also an option
  10:00 < mcmahill> there is a prototype for wcwidth in /usr/include/wchar.h that conflicts with the one that git has
  10:01 < Ales> what about w32, does git run there?
  10:01 < ivan> mercurial does
  10:01 < peterbrett> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_(software)#Portability
  10:02 < ivan> as for git on w32, I wouldn't want to try that
  10:02 < peterbrett> It runs in Cygwin (I had an interesting e-mail conversation with Linus about getting that to work, since Windows is missing fork() )
  10:03 < peterbrett> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=114131099531633
  10:08 < cnieves> Ales: in gschem, when you hit help->manual, a page is open in a browser. How is this page created? release time? could it be a wiki page (or at least inside the wiki directory)?
  10:09 < Ales> gschemdoc is called and that launches the web browser
  10:09 < cnieves> I know. I mean the page itself.
  10:10 < Ales> which page?
  10:10 < Ales> the url?
  10:10 < cnieves> ~/geda/share/doc/geda-doc/gedadocs.html
  10:12 < Ales> that path is baked into gschemdoc at configure time
  10:12 < Ales> based on the prefix
  10:13 < cnieves> I was applying PeterB's patches (help menus,..). I keep the help->manual behaviour as it was before (because you mention you'd prefer to wait until the UG is improved, and gsch2pcb tutorial is on the wiki). PeterB added a scheme function to call gschemdoc -w (to open a wiki page), and then removed the old help-manual function.
  10:13 < peterbrett> mcmahill: http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/12077.html
  10:14 < Ales> yes, I would like to maintain the old behavior until all the docs are in the wiki
  10:14 < cnieves> We can get rid of that function if we add another help-manual scheme function, or put gedadocs.html inside the wiki
  10:14 < cnieves> (inside the wiki directory, I mean), so it can be opened with gschem -w 
  10:14 < peterbrett> mcmahill: ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/devel/scmgit/README.html
  10:15 < cnieves> Ales: I didn't apply PeterB's #5 (move gschemdoc inside gschem/scripts) because we will lost cvs history. Can you do something regarding that?
  10:15 < peterbrett> cnieves: Move to a VCS that supports renames :P
  10:16 < Ales> what do you mean you lost cvs history?
  10:16 < dj> dan: arbitrary rotations.  There are two patches; one that does too little and one that does too much.
  10:16 < Ales> yes like subversion. :)
  10:16 < peterbrett> Ales: Subversion is just CVS with changesets
  10:16 < dj> And dirt-cheap branches.
  10:16 < dj> And checkout-branch-by-timestamp
  10:17 < Ales> and runs everywhere
  10:17 < dj> and versionable renames
  10:17 < peterbrett> dj: And doesn't track merges
  10:17 < dj> ah, but merges are atomic
  10:17 < cnieves> Ales: That patch moved gschemdoc.sh from utils/scripts to gschem/scripts. if I remove utils/scripts/gschemdoc.sh, and then add gschem/scripts/gschemdoc.sh, we will lost gschemdoc.sh's history
  10:17 < peterbrett> dj: it doesn't track merges
  10:17 < dj> Ah, but merges are atomic
  10:17 < peterbrett> dj: That has nothing to do with it!
  10:18 < Ales> carlos: I think that's okay
  10:18 < Ales> the history of the old gschemdoc.sh is still in cvs
  10:18 < dj> Well, you repeated yourself without adding more facts, so I repeated my response.  If you want a better response, you have to ask a better question.
  10:18 < peterbrett> "Merge tracking describes whether a system remembers what changes have been merged between which branches and only merges the changes that are missing when merging one branch into another."
  10:18 < dj> Ah, you want sablime.
  10:18 < cnieves> Ales: ok. what about gedadocs.html?
  10:19 < peterbrett> Also, SVN doesn't support me having 5 different branches which I'm currently working on but don't want to export to everyone
  10:19 < Ales> 5 checkouts?
  10:19 < dj> sure it does. 
  10:20 < peterbrett> Ales: No, 5 branches.  In the same repository, which I can switch between.  Without needing network connectivity.
  10:20 < dj> You need the local svn cache package
  10:20 < dj> Then you can build up a patch set and merge it back to the main repository later.
  10:20 < Ales> carlos: what about gedadocs.html?  I want to keep using it. 
  10:20 < peterbrett> dj: Does it do patch reordering?
  10:20 < dj> (we really should read the gcc discussions on all this before proceeding, this is all old news to me)
  10:20 < pcjc2> Carlos: Your latest fix was in my patch
  10:21 < pcjc2> also, it doesn't _gaurantee_ there aren't other ways of closing that dialog
  10:21 < dj> I don't know the details, I just know there's a local repository option.
  10:21 < cnieves> ales: what about moving gedadocs.html inside the wiki directory?
  10:22 < Ales> Carlos: i'd rather not do that, since I want to get rid of it at some point
  10:22 < Ales> I don't want to reogranize the wiki
  10:22 < pcjc2> the fix should be: +  if (response != GTK_RESPONSE_YES )
  10:22 < pcjc2> +    return;
  10:22 < pcjc2> it is two lines, and says explicitly what we want
  10:22 < cnieves> pcjc2: go and change it
  10:23 < cnieves> ales: you don't need to reorganize, just move a file from one directory to another. Am I missing something?
  10:24 < pcjc2> Carlos: I don't want to start a patch war over it, but if you're happy, I will change it
  10:24 < peterbrett> dj: http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitConversion
  10:24 < dj> Is this a code sprint or a repository reorganization sprint?
  10:24 < cnieves> pcjc2: yup
  10:24 < peterbrett> dj: Yes.
  10:24 < pcjc2> I can't remember for sure, but I believe there are many ways of quitting out of the dialog, and it is a pain to have to catch all the -ve cases specifically - safer just to catch the +ve response in this case
  10:27 < pcjc2> (Just refreshing my checkout - was working on the original patch)
  10:27 < pcjc2> I agree that its a good idea to fix that in a separate changelog item though, as it is a separate fix
  10:27 < cnieves> ok
  10:27 < Ales> where do we stand on the locale.h fix?
  10:28 < pcjc2> I think the cause is understood
  10:28 < pcjc2> but I've not written the autoconf magic to fix it
  10:28 < Ales> okay, I like the autoconf magic to fix it. :)
  10:28 < pcjc2> we can't rely on gettext defining the HAVE_LOCALE_H macro for us, we need to test ourselves.
  10:29 < pcjc2> If we don't have it, the choice is, build with --disable-nls
  10:29 < dj> dan: step 1, allow non-90 pre-existing pads.
  10:29 < Ales> sounds good
  10:29 < pcjc2> I think the most obvious fix, is to test, hard fail if not compiled with --disable-nls, but suggest that it is an option
  10:30 < Ales> ok
  10:37 -!- rikster [~rik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  10:49 < pcjc2> Carlos: changed it in CVS, thanks - sorry to nit-pick
  10:50 < cnieves> pcjc2: no problem
  10:50 -!- sdb [~sdb@xxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Ping timeout: 633 seconds]
  10:53 -!- sdb [~sdb@xxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  10:53 < sdb> Here I am
  10:53 < sdb> the Ethernet cable popped out since I broke the tab on the connector
  10:54 < cnieves> hi Stuart, welcome back
  10:56 < sdb> Hi!
  10:56 < pcjc2> I'm going to look into the locale.h automagic
  10:58 < Ales> I'm fixing the gnetlist tests to work with distcheck
  10:58 < pcjc2> dan: in gattrib and gschem, there is a file under include "gettext.h"
  10:59 < pcjc2> "/* Convenience header for conditional use of GNU <libintl.h>."
  10:59 < pcjc2> Did this feature in your compile warnings for gattrib?
  10:59 < pcjc2> lots of sub specific stuff
  11:00 < peterbrett> Ales: I don't think that should be in gEDA... :-/
  11:00 < Ales> the Makefile.am in utils/tests/refdes_renum/outputs needed to be updated to get rid of the colon too
  11:00 < Ales> I'll do that
  11:00 < pcjc2> s\sub\sun\
  11:00 < Ales> peterb: huh?  
  11:00 < pcjc2> scrolling back, I see dan isn't about
  11:01 < peterbrett> Ales: {gschem,gattrib}/include/gettext.h
  11:01 < pcjc2> was looking to see what "gettext.h" in gschem/include/" was for
  11:01 < Ales> okay, is there a better approach?
  11:02 < pcjc2> I hadn't worked out what it was for yet, just wanted to see if it had featured in dan's investigation of re-defined function warnings
  11:02 < Ales> if so, I'm okay with removing the file and reusing a system include, but it has to work with and without gettext
  11:02 < peterbrett> According to the info pages for gettext, we should just #include <libintl.h>
  11:03 < Ales> ok
  11:03 < sdb> I just looked into gattrib/include, and yes, there is a gettext.h in there.
  11:03 < sdb> Ummmm I don't know what it is for.  Maybe Dan put it in.
  11:04 < sdb> The question is:  Are you worried that it interferes with the system gettext stuff?
  11:04 < peterbrett> Apparently it's to make it easy to disable gettext if desired
  11:04 -!- dj [~dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  11:04 < peterbrett> Ooh, dj has disappeared
  11:04 < Ales> dj is rebooting into windows
  11:04 < sdb> DJ left since he's booting two windows *shudder*
  11:04 < sdb> I had to avert my eyes
  11:04 < peterbrett> dj: I hope you've put him into quarantine ;)
  11:04 < Igor2> :>
  11:04 < sdb> dj needs to check something on anther gerber viewer!!
  11:05 < peterbrett> Which one?
  11:05 < sdb> (That was DJ on my machine)
  11:05 < sdb> He wants to use GVPrevue
  11:05 < sdb> He wants to use GCPrevue
  11:05 < peterbrett> Sure
  11:05 < pcjc2> http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/lib_002fgettext_002eh.html
  11:05 < peterbrett> It's pretty good
  11:05 < pcjc2> Looks like it is the recommended way of including gettext - its worth checking that its correct and up-to-date though
  11:13 < cnieves> sdb: I'm setting the alternative button order for gtk dialogs. Would you mind if I add two of them in gattrib/src/x_fileselect.c ?
  11:14 < pcjc2> Is gattrib/src/x_fileselect.c up-to-date with gschem's
  11:14 < pcjc2> There was divergence at one point, but I can't remember if it was fixed
  11:15 < cnieves> what needed to be fixed?
  11:17 -!- dj [~dj@xxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  11:17 < peterbrett> dj: wb
  11:17 < sdb> cnieves: Please go ahead!
  11:17 < pcjc2> I'm not sure anything. It moved to using the new GTK dialogs, didn't it
  11:17 < dj> gerbv is broken, had to check gcpreview to make sure.
  11:18 < peterbrett> sdb: Is there any chance you could fix gattrib not to 'Just Close' when you hit the close window decoration?
  11:21 < pcjc2> bit of history.... what is geda/graphman/* ?
  11:21 < pcjc2> (he looks, wondering which packages need the locale.h fix)
  11:22 < Ales> graphman was some sort of interface to one of the waveform views
  11:22 < Ales> geda/* does not need any fix.
  11:22 < pcjc2> ok
  11:22 < Ales> I will be removing it and setup out of gaf
  11:22 < pcjc2> sounds good
  11:28  * peterbrett files two bug reports against gattrib
  11:29 < sdb> Peter -- That's fine.  You want it to just ask first, right?
  11:29 < peterbrett> Yep
  11:30 < peterbrett> But only if the spreadsheet has changed
  11:30 < sdb> Yea, that the behavior if you select "file -> quit" from the menu.
  11:31 < pcjc2> I'm not seeing where the --disable-nls logic comes from here.. but I need the test for locale.h to use it
  11:34 < peterbrett> sdb: surely it should be handled by the same code?
  11:43 < pcjc2> Ales: RE. Locale.h, something appears to have changed on my box.. I can't reproduce the original bug
  11:44 < pcjc2> Its compiling fine, inspite of no locale.h being included by us explicitly
  11:44 < Ales> peter: oops. :(
  11:44 < Ales> we should still do the fix though
  11:44 < pcjc2> some other header is probably pulling it in
  11:44 < sdb> Peter,  I may be allowing GTK to handle the callback from the window decoration.
  11:44 < sdb> I need to look.
  11:44 < pcjc2> sure - its just harder to ensure it is really fixed.. working on it though
  11:46 < rikster> Guidance needed: slotted components and refdes_renum
  11:46 < rikster> There is an outstanding ToDo in the gEDA wiki to have any of the various
  11:46 < rikster> refdes tools handle slotted components.
  11:46 < rikster> As part of the last code sprint I wrote an improved refdes tool and uploaded it to SourceForge.  My question today is whether I should modify that script to also handle slotted components.
  11:46 < rikster> The issue is that all of the current tools are line-oriented and just use regular expressions to update the refdes field.  In order to handle slotted components the program will have to have an understanding of instantiation structure, be able to parse the symbol search tree, and be able to add slot= attributes to the schematic.  Is this a sufficiently cool feature that I should spend several hours on it or should I look for quicker bugs?
  11:49 < peterbrett> rikster: Don't forget there is no way it could currently work properly with hierarchical schematics
  11:50 < Igor2> !define geda-cvs
  11:50 < jmp> >Igor2> [1/1] geda-cvs: http://www.geda.seul.org/developer.html
  11:50 < Igor2> time to compile
  11:50 < peterbrett> Igor2: :)
  11:50 < peterbrett> Igor2: See you next week :P
  11:50 < Igor2> off for the weekend? :)
  11:50 < Igor2> ahh, ok, i got it now :)
  11:51 < Igor2> no, i have an 1.7 ghz server at the department
  11:51 < Igor2> i'll compile for i386 and i586 there :>
  11:51 < rikster> Is that the general case, that none of the refdes tools work with hierarchical schematics?
  11:52 < peterbrett> It's because we've got no way currently of overriding attributes set in schematics lower in the hierarchy on an instance-by-instance basis
  11:52 < cnieves> I added a gtk call to set the alternative button order for other systems. Gschem and gattrib should look now like any other gtk app, changing the button order depending on the operating system the user is running. I also updated http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:devel-tips to show how to do this, and updated the dialog template.
  11:53 < peterbrett> All hail Carlos!
  11:53 < Igor2> omg, a full wiki mirror
  11:53 < Igor2> i see that 40 gb disk will be full soon :>
  11:53 < peterbrett> Igor2: Indeed.  It's been in there for a while :/
  11:53 < cnieves> So, if anyone adds a new dialog, _please_ add that line after creating the dialog
  11:53 < peterbrett> o-\-<
  11:54 < peterbrett> o-/-<
  11:54 < Igor2> :>
  11:54 < peterbrett> o-\-<
  11:54 < Igor2> o-&-<   - after a bike accident :)
  11:55 < cnieves> Reminder: attribute autoplacing stuff is now in cvs. If you want to play with them, check system-gschemrc.
  11:56 < cnieves> Ales: can we get rid of libgd and make libgeda compile with gdk-pixbuf by default?
  11:56 -!- dj [~dj@xxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Ping timeout: 633 seconds]
  11:56 < pcjc2> Ales: locale.h
  11:56 < pcjc2> you would not believe it
  11:56 < pcjc2> I've got HAVE_LOCALE_H explicitly undefined
  11:56 < pcjc2> yet gschem still manages to compile ok
  11:56 < pcjc2> turns out...
  11:57 < pcjc2> that if you pass "-g" to gcc, then somehow, don't ask me why or how, locale.h gets pulled in
  11:57 < pcjc2> without us asking for it
  11:57 < Igor2> mkdir: cannot create directory `/gEDA': Permission denied
  11:57 < Igor2> strange
  11:57 < Igor2> i've set prefix to /usr in the main Makefile
  11:58 < rikster> So none of the refdes tools will work with hierarchical designs.  Is the fraction of designs that use don't use hierarchy in this way large?
  11:58 < rikster> If most designs don't use hierarchy then perhaps the feature is still  worthwhile
  11:58 < peterbrett> I like hierarchy :(
  11:59 < peterbrett> Although you make a good point
  11:59 < peterbrett> I htink the biggest problem is that you **can't** support hierarchical annotation/back-annotation without breaking backward-compatibility
  12:00 < rikster> Wasn't a Google Summer of Code person going to add support for hierarchical annotation?
  12:01 < pcjc2> sure, although it was only a suggestion
  12:01  * Igor2 kills the ones who invented autotools
  12:01 < pcjc2> There are some works in progress on design ideas, and such which pave the way
  12:02 < peterbrett> rikster: There's an ongoing Cunning Plan, as pcjc2 says ;)
  12:03 < rikster> I think it sounds best to hold off implementing anything until an approach to hierarchy is adopted.  Bonus: I get to procrastinate on coding :)
  12:03 < peterbrett> Does anyone mind me putting emacs mode magic into system-gschemrc?
  12:04 -!- dj [~dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  12:08 < pcjc2> rikster: don't hold off any development waiting for things which might never happen
  12:08 < Igor2> hi dj!
  12:08 < dj> network seems flakey today.  Stuart got timed out, then me.
  12:09 < pcjc2> Whilst there may be some ideas floating about, I _definitely_ don't want to suggest holding off features
  12:10 < pcjc2> What language is your refdes renumbering tool in?
  12:10 < rikster> perl
  12:11 < pcjc2> ah - so my next suggestion.... that it should be done by pulling in libgeda isn't fantastic then ;)
  12:11 < pcjc2> libgeda knows how to read the files necessary, so you can ask it to delve into the right file and pull out the needed slot attributes
  12:12 < pcjc2> but there is little point writing a libgeda binding for perl, just to do so
  12:13 < Igor2>  (write binding for GPMI and then it will have for perl, python, guile, tcl, ruby, lua, php, bash, pascal, lisp...)
  12:13 < rikster> What kind of bindings already exist?
  12:13 < rikster> just C?
  12:13 < pcjc2> libgeda needs cleaning before we write bindings to it, but in principle yes
  12:13 < pcjc2> just C (which isn't a binding of course)
  12:13 < pcjc2> internally, it can use scheme, so there is some guile stuff inside it
  12:14 < pcjc2> What information do you need from a schematic..? For each component, you have to delve into its symbol, and look for slot attributes?
  12:14 < rikster> That's right.
  12:16 < pcjc2> I wounder if some command line util which links against libgeda, takes a filename, and returns some text (for the toplevel attributes) would be useful for scripting with
  12:16 < pcjc2> something like geda-symbol-attribs my_multi_slot_opamp.sym
  12:17 < Ales> Carlos: go ahead and remove libgd dependancy and checking
  12:17 < pcjc2> which could print all the attributes out line by line, on a "NAME = VALUE" basis, for further script based processing
  12:17 < pcjc2> woo
  12:17 < Igor2> great, i get tons of unresolved symbols when compiling cvs version of gschem :)
  12:17 < cnieves> rikster: I made "save" the default response of the save page dialog. You should be able to just type the filename and hit enter. (Implementing your FR). Please test
  12:17 < pcjc2> (woo: relating to loss of libgd - thats a lot of code to remove)
  12:18 < cnieves> Ales: ok.
  12:18 < pcjc2> Igor: What symbols?
  12:18 < Igor2> geda/gaf/gschem/src/g_register.c:330: undefined reference to `scm_c_define_gsubr'
  12:18 < Igor2> mostly scm_c_define*
  12:18 < rikster> Thanks, cnieves.  I've got to get some breakfast soon(West coast) but I'll try to test that out today.
  12:18 < peterbrett> Ales: I can't work out how to bind Page Up & Page Down keys
  12:18 < cnieves> pcjc2: not at all: the first stage is to make libgd not the default. Removing libgd code can be done in the next release if there is no problem reported.
  12:19 < Igor2> or rather scm*
  12:19 < pcjc2> ah, but laters there can be much code shortening
  12:19 < Ales> carlos: that's a good plan
  12:19 < Igor2>  /usr/lib/libgeda.so: undefined reference to `scm_puts'
  12:19 < cnieves> igor: do you have libguile-dev installed?
  12:19 < rikster> At least for Perl, it is possible to write inline calls to C pretty easily.  Perhaps I can link against libgeda and just use C routines.
  12:19 < Igor2> yup
  12:19 < Igor2> libguile1.8-dev
  12:20 < peterbrett> Ales: I've tried both "PageUp" & "PgUp" and neither seem to work
  12:20 < pcjc2> just be warned... libgeda is a moving target, so if your inline calls to C require compilation, it needs to keep in sync with the CVS releases
  12:20 < peterbrett> Ah
  12:21 < peterbrett> It's "Prior" & "Next"
  12:21 < peterbrett> But that's not totally intuitive
  12:21 < pcjc2> or does it use dlopen etc..?
  12:21 < Igor2> so, any idea? :)
  12:22 < peterbrett> GAH
  12:22 < Igor2> these are the -ls:
  12:22 < Igor2>  -lgeda -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -lX11   -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0       -lSM -lICE -lX11 
  12:22 < Igor2> isn't -lguile something missing?
  12:22 < Ales> Peter: Page_Up and Page_Down
  12:22 < peterbrett> Ales: Thanks
  12:23 < peterbrett> Ales: (where did you find that, BTW?)
  12:23 < pcjc2> Igor: hmm... looks like
  12:23 < pcjc2> perhaps its not picking up the link flags from libgeda
  12:23 < pcjc2> did you make install ok from libgeda?
  12:23 < Ales> enabled this in (g_key.c): 
  12:23 < Ales> #if DEBUG
  12:23 < Ales>   printf("_%s_\n", guile_string);
  12:23 < Ales> #endif
  12:23 < Ales> and observed the keyname
  12:23 < Igor2> i did make install from the main dir as README suggested :>
  12:23 < Ales> cheated. :)
  12:24 < peterbrett> Ales: Clearly :)
  12:24 < Igor2> ok, installed libgeda by hand, no visible error message
  12:25 < rikster> Just checked Perl docs some more and I only need to link against libgeda and presumably that interface isn't changing as fast as the CVS releases
  12:25 < pcjc2> Igor: did it help gschem?
  12:25 < Igor2> just trying, now everything gets recompiled there
  12:25 < Igor2> with -O2 
  12:25 < Igor2> takes time even on 1.7 ghz :)
  12:26 < pcjc2> no, but for each release, structures in libgeda can change
  12:26 < Igor2> same errors
  12:26 < pcjc2> rikster: so if you rely on finding some element of, say the "ATTRIB" or "OBJECT" structure at byte-offset 4, for example, that could change from release to release
  12:27 < pcjc2> Igor: I'll look to see where I get guile included frmo
  12:27 < pcjc2> from
  12:27 < Igor2> guile-config
  12:27 < Igor2> it returns
  12:27 < Igor2>  -lguile -lltdl  -lgmp -lcrypt -lm -lltdl
  12:27 < Igor2> but adding those doesn't help
  12:28 < rikster> Perhaps I need to take a look at libgeda more closely.  Are there getter methods that effectively implement data encapsulation so I don't need to know the byte offsets of structures?
  12:28 < pcjc2> I have guile 1.6.8, so I can't verify its not a break in compatibility with guile-1.8
  12:28 < Igor2> ok... downgrading :)
  12:31 < Igor2> ok, less error
  12:32 < Igor2> now issuing make clean, configure and make again
  12:33 < pcjc2> odd...
  12:33 < Igor2> is it enough if i do it in gschem?
  12:33 < Igor2> or is libgeda affected as well?
  12:33 < pcjc2> that scm_c_define_gsubr function is in both the 1.6 and 1.8 manuals for guile
  12:33 < pcjc2> I'm not sure, to be honest
  12:33 < Igor2> maybe  you need more #include for 1.8?
  12:34 < Igor2> maybe they are marcos in 1.8 and if you don't #include, they remain unresovled
  12:34 < Igor2> yeah, i need to recompile libgeda as well
  12:35 < Igor2> o_line_basic.c: In function 'o_line_image_write':
  12:35 < Igor2> o_line_basic.c:1239: warning: unused variable 'y'
  12:35 < Igor2> o_line_basic.c:1239: warning: unused variable 'x'
  12:35 < Igor2> :)
  12:36 < rikster> cnieves: Just tested the patch for hitting return in a save dialog box.  It works fine, BUT
  12:36 < Igor2> >pcjc2> are patches fixing those kind of warnings welcome?
  12:37 < rikster> I'm now getting this warning message on the command line repeated three times:Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_box_reorder_child: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (child)' failed
  12:37 < peterbrett> Igor2: Um, yes, they're welcome, but I haven't seen any of those and I've been compiling it lots recently 8-)
  12:37 < peterbrett> or even :-O
  12:38 < pcjc2> I'm attempting to reproruce
  12:38 < Igor2> ok, make clean once again in gschem
  12:38 < Igor2> meanwhile packing, need to go home soon :)
  12:38 < pcjc2> its probably a libgd dependant thing
  12:38 < Igor2> maybe i have too new version of libgd as well? :>
  12:39 < cnieves> rikster: I'm not sure it is related with the fix....
  12:39 < peterbrett> cnieves: your hacks to gschemdoc.sh have broken 05-move-gschemdoc.patch
  12:39 < pcjc2> if you don't have libgd, it uses a different mechanism to write the PNG file
  12:39 < peterbrett> cnieves: So if we decide to apply at a later date it'll need to be recreated
  12:39 < cnieves> peterbrett: only the gschemdoc.sh file.
  12:40 < Igor2> ok, i have tons of scm shit again
  12:40 < Igor2> so i go home ;)
  12:40 < pcjc2> I'd not worry about fixing the undefined variables
  12:40 < pcjc2> its a 
  12:40 < pcjc2> '
  12:40 < cnieves> peterbrett: gschemdoc can be moved now. It is still missing #4.
  12:40 < Igor2> anyway yeah, i don't have libgd :)
  12:41 < Igor2> now i'm off, bbl
  12:41 < pcjc2> bah! layer 8 keyboard error! - If libgd support is being phased out, the code will go anyway - no need to patch it in the mean time
  12:41 < peterbrett> cnieves: yes, I know, I'm just rebasing them locally :)
  12:41 < pcjc2> Igor: bye!
  12:41 < cnieves> bye Igor
  12:43 < rikster> m cnieves if the new gtk warnings are unrelated then go ahead and mark my feature request resolved.  Thanks for the quick turn.
  12:45 < rikster> m rikster hello
  12:45 < cnieves> rikster: I would like to know what are those warnings about...
  12:46 < cnieves> what gtk are you using?
  12:48 < peterbrett> Is it allowed to have multiple keys bound to a single function in gschem?
  12:48 < Ales> I think so
  12:48 < rikster> m cnieves gtk+-2.10.9
  12:49 < Ales> yes, absolutely
  12:50 < peterbrett> And which one sets the key shown in the menus?
  12:50 < peterbrett> The first one set, or the most recent one?
  12:50 < cnieves> rikster: I'm using 2.10.11, and I see no warnings when I hit "file->save as". What are the steps you follow to reproduce it?
  12:54 < rikster> m cnieves steps to reproduce: Open existing schematic, make a change, file->save as, warning is produced when dialog box is opened
  12:54  * rikster is away: time for breakfast.  Back in 30.
  12:55 < Ales> peter: last one
  12:55 < cnieves> rikster: in gschem/src/x_fileselect.c: around line 240 (function x_fileselect_save), comment out the lines between #if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,6,0) and its #endif. Recompile, and check again, please.
  13:04 < pcjc2> Ales: locale.h issue: Index: configure.ac.in
  13:04 < pcjc2> ===================================================================
  13:04 < pcjc2> RCS file: /home/cvspsrv/cvsroot/eda/geda/gaf/gschem/configure.ac.in,v
  13:04 < pcjc2> retrieving revision 1.7
  13:04 < pcjc2> diff -U3 -p -r1.7 configure.ac.in
  13:04 < pcjc2> --- configure.ac.in     17 Apr 2007 20:19:14 -0000      1.7
  13:04 < pcjc2> +++ configure.ac.in     21 Apr 2007 16:56:37 -0000
  13:04 < pcjc2> @@ -392,6 +392,18 @@ AC_HEADER_DIRENT
  13:04 < pcjc2>  AC_CHECK_HEADERS(unistd.h string.h stdlib.h \
  13:04 < pcjc2>                   stdarg.h assert.h fcntl.h errno.h sys/param.h)
  13:04 < pcjc2>  
  13:04 < pcjc2> +# Check for locale.h
  13:04 < pcjc2> +
  13:04 < pcjc2> +# Set USE_NLS
  13:04 < pcjc2> +AM_NLS
  13:04 < pcjc2> +AC_CHECK_HEADER([locale.h],
  13:04 < pcjc2> +                [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LOCALE_H], 1, [Define if you have locale.h])],
  13:04 < pcjc2> +                [
  13:04 < pcjc2> +                  if test "$USE_NLS" == "yes"; then
  13:04 < pcjc2> +                    AC_MSG_ERROR([Cannot find useful locale.h, and nls support is enabled. Try compiling with --disable-nls])
  13:04 < pcjc2> +                  fi
  13:04 < pcjc2> +                ])
  13:04 < pcjc2> +
  13:04 < pcjc2>  # Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics.
  13:04 < pcjc2>  AC_C_CONST
  13:04 < pcjc2> bah
  13:04 < pcjc2> sorry
  13:04 < pcjc2> that was supposed to be the pastebin URL!
  13:04 < pcjc2> http://www.pastebin.ca/451553
  13:04 < Ales> dj's pc was beeping like mad here
  13:04 < cnieves> mine too!
  13:04 < peterbrett> Yay pastebomb
  13:04 < Ales> he has it setup to beep on any irc activity
  13:05 < cnieves> Warning: terrorist alert!! Action: kill pcjc2...
  13:05 < pcjc2> pcjc2: goes to hide somewhere
  13:05 < sdb> Hey -- Does anybody have any SPICE schematics they would like to share?
  13:06 < Ales> peter: looks good
  13:06 < sdb> I am building a spice-sdb test suite and want to include some typcial
  13:06 < peterbrett> Ales: Which peter?
  13:06 < sdb> SPICE-able schematics for regression testing.  In particular, if people
  13:06 < sdb> have schematics wiht slotted parts and stuff like that, I'd like to  use them.
  13:07 < sdb> Just let me know, or e-mail them to me.  
  13:08 < peterbrett> If anyone fancies committing the patch I just sent to the list, feel free
  13:09 < peterbrett> Ales: We really need to do something about those ChangeLog's
  13:10 < Ales> what's wrong with the changelogs?
  13:10 < peterbrett> They're often a cause of race conditions between committers
  13:11 < peterbrett> They also cause a HUGE number of merge conflicts
  13:11 < peterbrett> In fact, they're one of the things that makes merging large branches so difficult
  13:11 < peterbrett> Ask pcjc2 ;)
  13:11 < peterbrett> Can't we do like PCB does and use cvs2cl.pl to generate the ChangeLog files?
  13:12 < dj> No, you can't.  Really.
  13:12 < pcjc2> how comes?
  13:12 < peterbrett> dj @(
  13:12 < dj> You don't get as good a quality CL entry that way.
  13:12 < pcjc2> Editing the log is a real pain.. merge tastic when bringing in the branches
  13:13 < pcjc2> There is no reason we can't use a decent message in the CVS commit log
  13:13 < peterbrett> dj: But people should be putting good quality log messages into the CVS log anyway!!!
  13:13 < Ales> I like what dj is about to say
  13:14 < pcjc2> The one problem I see is that you can't tell it which "module" the ChangeLog message belongs to
  13:14 < dj> Here's what we should do...  Edit the ChangeLog and commit it with the patch.  Use a copy of the CL entry (minus tabs and timestamp) as the cvs commit message.
  13:14 < dj> That way, you can "cvs log" the ChangeLog to find patches.
  13:14 < peterbrett> dj: GAHH NO !!!!
  13:14 < dj> cvs2cl screws up the cvs history in the ChangeLog file.
  13:14 < peterbrett> That's **horrible brokenness**
  13:14 < Ales> that's how we have been operating for the last 9 years
  13:15 < dj> gcc and binutils do it that way too.
  13:15 < pcjc2> dj: speaking of gcc, can I change the subject a second....
  13:15 < dj> and cygwin, newlib, gdb, and cgen.
  13:15 < Ales> I've never been a changelog or commit message bastard
  13:15 < dj> too late, second's up.
  13:15 < Ales> :)
  13:15 < pcjc2> why... does adding "-g" bring "locale.h" in, when without "-g", it doesn't
  13:16 < pcjc2> (This was for gschem.c, which has a #ifdef on locale.h, and it wasn't being met appropriately. When compiled with -g, the preprocessor pulled in locale.h, and got on with it anyway)
  13:17 < cnieves> peterbrett: patch comitted. Thanks! (I couldn't use ">" or "<" either)
  13:17 < peterbrett> dj: my main objection to your proposal for commit log message format is that when browsing history with a "short log" format like this, http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf.git?a=shortlog , you'd just get a list of filenames.
  13:17 < peterbrett> Which isn't useful at all
  13:18 < dj> Well, then don't use git.
  13:18 < peterbrett> Also, when people inevitably forget to write the commit message, you randomly get entire patch sets missing from your search
  13:19 < Ales> people better not be forgetting to add a commit message
  13:19 < dj> cvsweb doesn't have problems with gnu-standard changelog entries as cvs commit messages.
  13:19 < peterbrett> (I mean, forget to update the ChangeLog in the same commit)
  13:19 < dj> cvs doesn't tie them anyway, so no loss there.
  13:19 < cnieves> I've been using (or trying to) use commit logs friendly to git, while keeping the current rule
  13:19 < dj> locale.h: my config.,h has #define HAVE_LOCALE_H 1
  13:21 < Ales> I don't have that in my config.h
  13:21 < rikster> j #geda
  13:22  * rikster is back
  13:22 < pcjc2> dj: that HAVE_LOCALE_H may be coming from somewhere else, in gettext
  13:23 < pcjc2> but we can't rely on it unless we ask for it specifically. (Gettext keeps changing and breaking things)
  13:23 < rikster> m cnieves Your suggestion to comment out the #ifdef stuff worked.  The FR is 100% implemented for me at this point.
  13:26 < peterbrett> cnieves: Is #1553483 fixed in CVS?
  13:27 < cnieves> rikster: Then it's not related with your FR. Something is not working. Could you please check: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1553483&group_id=161080&atid=818426 and run the test program there?
  13:27 < cnieves> peterbrett: I thought so, but rikster has found some GTK warnings I don't like.
  13:27 < peterbrett> kk
  13:32 < pcjc2> Carlos: Your last commit I think causes issues for compiling with libgd
  13:32 < cnieves> why?
  13:32 < pcjc2> The variables you removed are needed for libgd, I guess the bug (if really worth fixing) is the variable definitions should be inside the #ifdef LIBGD block)
  13:33 < cnieves> oh, you are right!
  13:34 < cnieves> need to revert that!
  13:34 < pcjc2> do you have the diff of the commit? If not, I can update my git-tracking thingy, and produce a reverse patch quite easily
  13:35 < Igor2> back
  13:35 < sdb> PeterB -- I just fixed the Gattrib bug where it would close without checking if hte user
  13:36 < Igor2> any news for me? :)
  13:36  * peterbrett dances
  13:36 < sdb> hit the X window decoration.  Please feel free to check it.
  13:36 < peterbrett> Igor2: Any news for us?
  13:36 < Igor2> :>
  13:36 < peterbrett> sdb: Don't worry, I trust you ;)
  13:36 < Igor2> i haven't crashed into cars! :)
  13:36 < Igor2> ok,so i should install that libgd now, right?
  13:36 < pcjc2> its not needed
  13:36 < Igor2> then what should i do to get it working? :)
  13:36 < pcjc2> just you get a few unused variable warnings if you use the alternative
  13:36 < Igor2> no, it's not that
  13:37 < pcjc2> Guile is the problem on your machine by the sounds of it
  13:37 < Igor2> it's still the unresolved scm* 
  13:37 < Ales> speaking of warnings... there are a bunch in libgeda and gschem now
  13:37 < Igor2> currently downgraded to 1.6
  13:37 < sdb> PeterB:  Trust but verify, I gnerally say.  But I'll go ahead and close the bug report on SF.
  13:37 < Ales> are those intentional or accidental?  Most of them are due to unused variables
  13:37 < pcjc2> how about posting a config.log for gschem and / or libgeda
  13:37 < Igor2> i have make clean and ./configur both in libgeda and gschem after downgrade
  13:37 < Igor2> ok
  13:37 < peterbrett> pcb people:
  13:37 < pcjc2> Ales: accidental - but Carlos fixed them (and is now about to "fix them back" ;))
  13:37 < Ales> okay
  13:37 < pcjc2> If you compile without libgd, there were unused variables
  13:38 -!- jpd [~jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  13:38 < pcjc2> They need to be made conditional
  13:38 < Ales> Hi John (?)
  13:38 < jpd> Hi
  13:38 < cnieves> hi Hohn
  13:38 < peterbrett> dj: http://pastebin.ca/451595
  13:39 < cnieves> s/Hohn/John sorry!
  13:39 < jpd> Hello folks.
  13:39 < peterbrett> dj: This is in CVS checkout
  13:39 < peterbrett> hi jpd 
  13:39 < Igor2> >pcjc2> http://inno.bme.hu/~igor2/tmp/config.log.libgeda
  13:39 < Igor2> >pcjc2> http://inno.bme.hu/~igor2/tmp/config.log.gschem
  13:39 < dj> cvs update -d
  13:40 < peterbrett> dj: d'oh
  13:40 < peterbrett> dj: I hate CVS :(
  13:40 < dj> subversion handles new directories properly.
  13:40 < dj> and removes them when you go back in time, too.
  13:40 < pcjc2> Carlos: a patch of the remove variables commit is at www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/removed_variables.diff
  13:41 < cnieves> pcjc2: thank you! I've just reverted the patch, and I'm about to #ifdef the variables.
  13:41 < peterbrett> We were just commenting that this is one of the most active sprints we've seen
  13:42 < dj> EVERYONE TYPE FASTER!
  13:42 < peterbrett> Also, I'm thinking of getting myself a copy of the IPC footprint document
  13:43 < pcjc2> Carlos: Looking at those functions, I doubt that any of the code is actually needed for non-libgd, so other than the function shell, the #ifdef may as well span the whole function
  13:43 < rikster> m cnieves Okay, I think I've found the problem.  In the lines beginning at 240 there are callouts to gtk_response_no, gtk_response_ok, and gtk_response_help.
  13:44 < rikster> m cnieves None of these are defined in the original call to setup the dialog box which is just above this.
  13:44 < Ales> rikster: what's with the "m" in front of your messages?
  13:45 < rikster> Dang, I was trying to just send a private message about this  stuff to cnieves but my irc tool isn't interpreting m to be msg.
  13:45 < Ales> okay
  13:45 < Ales> glad you haven't been complaining about us then. :-)
  13:45 < cnieves> pcjc2: could be. But I have the patch ready.
  13:46 < rikster> msg cnieves I commented out the callouts and added the one for gtk_response_accept and it now doesn't generate any messages
  13:47 < Ales> that didn't work either
  13:47 < Ales> try /msg cnieves :)
  13:47 < rikster> Aarrghh
  13:50 < peterbrett> Someone asked for single keystrokes to increase/decrease grid size in gschem (#1443637)
  13:50 < cnieves> it's in cvs since a long time...
  13:50 < peterbrett> cnieves: O RLY? RFE still open
  13:51  * peterbrett closes it
  13:51 -!- Levente [~Levente@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  13:51 < cnieves> isn't there a comment to the submitter to test that?
  13:51 < cnieves> hi Levente
  13:51 < Levente> Hi all!
  13:51 < Ales> Hi Levente
  13:51 < peterbrett> cnieves: it would be nicer to have it as '[' & ']'
  13:52 < sdb> Hi Levente
  13:52 < Levente> Hi Stuart
  13:52 < peterbrett> cnieves: And I notice these are not currently used
  13:52 < cnieves> peterbrett: I have no preference
  13:52 < peterbrett> cool, I'll change it then
  13:53 < cnieves> nice. Why don't you ask for write access to Ales?
  13:53 < peterbrett> Ales: CVS commit access pls
  13:56 -!- rikster [~rik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: thanks for all the good tools.]
  13:59 < Igor2> hi Levente :)
  13:59 < Levente> hi Igor2 :) How things goin'?
  13:59 < Igor2> fine, thanx, how are you? :)
  13:59 < Igor2> do you participate in critical mass tomorrow?
  14:00 < Levente> I'm okay too... Yes, sure! So we can see each other? Maybe we can talk HA there?
  14:00 < Levente> :-)
  14:01 < Igor2> yeah :)
  14:01 < Levente> Btw, I try to hack a bit on my grenum thing.
  14:01 < Igor2> i will pick up Mikko at the uni at 3 pm
  14:02 < Igor2> (Mikko is a guest student from Finland, we managed to get him a bike:)
  14:02 < Levente> I'm gonna get there around 3:30
  14:02 < Igor2> then we will meet with some other guys at Arpad hid's pest end
  14:02 < Igor2> at around 4:00
  14:02 < Levente> I live close there.... Buda end...
  14:03 < Igor2> then we could meet at Arpad hid/buda between 3:30 and 4:00?
  14:03 < Levente> Okay, that is good!
  14:03 < Igor2> ok, how do we recognise eachothers? :)
  14:04 < Igor2> (don't say you wil have a bike - everyone will have one around that time:)
  14:04 < Levente> You know, I'm gonna come with a bike
  14:04 < Igor2> ahh, i knew, i knew! :>>>
  14:04 < Levente> okay... sorry...
  14:04 < Levente> a blue one....
  14:04 < Igor2> will you be alone?
  14:04 < Levente> I don't know yet....
  14:05 < Igor2> i will have a colorful bike (red/green/blue with a black/yellow bag) and Mikko has a green mountain bike
  14:05 < Levente> If you give me your cellphone number, I can ring you...
  14:05 < Igor2> i do not have a cellphone :)
  14:05 < Levente> Okay...
  14:07 < sdb> Levent, Igor, where is your critical mass?
  14:07 < sdb> We have it in San Francisco, New York, and here in Boston.
  14:08 < Igor2> Budapest
  14:08 < Igor2> about 30k participants are expected iirc
  14:08 < sdb> Cool!
  14:08 < pcjc2> Ales: Shall I get on with the patch for the gdk_keyval_name segfault?
  14:08 -!- pcjc2 [~pcjc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has left #geda []
  14:09 -!- pcjc2 [~pcjc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  14:10 < mcmahill> Ales?
  14:11 < Ales> Hi dan
  14:11 < Ales> peterC: please
  14:11 < dj> Hi dan!
  14:11 < Ales> I never got around to writing that patch up, so getting that in would be great!
  14:11 < mcmahill> what was the failure on distcheck?
  14:12 < mcmahill> I'm sure I can fix it 
  14:12 < Ales> I think it can't find one of the scripts
  14:12 < Ales> just run make distcheck 
  14:12 < mcmahill> ok.  I'll take a look
  14:12 < peterbrett> cnieves: I changed the keybindings, and unfortunately the keystrokes now appear as 'bracketleft' & 'bracketright'
  14:12 < peterbrett> which is quite lame
  14:12 < Ales> if you don't have time I am going to have to fix it, since Stuart reused your testing framework for some spice-sdb tests
  14:14 < mcmahill> oh, I see part of the problem.
  14:14 < mcmahill> when I renamed a bunch of files to get rid of ":" I forgot to update Makefile.am...
  14:14 < Ales> I fixed that already
  14:14 < Ales> lemme commit that
  14:14 < mcmahill> oh.  ok.
  14:14 < mcmahill> yeah, check that in and I'll see whats next.
  14:15 < mcmahill> hi DJ.  I saw you added some diagonal pad support.  That should be popular
  14:16 < cnieves> peterbrett: do you mean in the menu? that's not nice...
  14:16 < peterbrett> Yes
  14:16 < peterbrett> But not using those keys would suck
  14:16 < Ales> done
  14:18 < mcmahill> I suspect I left out an environment setting which is needed when building outside the source tree.
  14:18 < mcmahill> but since I reused the framework from something else that I know works with distcheck I'm sure whatever the issue is it won't be hard
  14:19 < Ales> yeah, that's my guess as well
  14:20 < peterbrett> Oh yeah
  14:21 < peterbrett> that reminds me
  14:21 < peterbrett> Do any make gurus know how to fix multithreaded make for geda?
  14:21 < peterbrett> Bug #1701813
  14:29 < Ales> you have to setup the dependancies manually and then it might work
  14:31 < Ales> is it worth it, probably not since we don't have that many parts
  14:32 < dj> dan: yeah, but it's not as easy as you'd think.
  14:33 < dj> IsPointInPolygon() doesn't actually do that any more :-P
  14:33 < mcmahill> because of the clipper or because the large number of places where assumptions are made that everything is on 90 deg increments?
  14:34 < dj> Because polygons are checked based on the polyareas, not the original point lists.
  14:34 < dj> so I can't just create a polygon for diagonal pads and use the existing primitives.
  14:34 < mcmahill> I guess I'm not up on how the polygons actually work
  14:34 < dj> Me neither, hence the problem.
  14:35 < mcmahill> hey, I never assumed diagonal pads were easy ;)
  14:37 < mcmahill> its not really geda related, but a few nights ago my son and I searched for "lego" on youtube and found some pretty cool lego movies
  14:37 < mcmahill> they ranged from some animation stuff to videos of way cool lego creations
  14:37 < mcmahill> there was a factory built of legos that robotically assembled small lego cars
  14:38 < peterbrett> Is there a length-safed equivalent of strstr?
  14:39 < peterbrett> ...or maybe there doesn't need to be one
  14:39 < dj> I keep trying to talk Jason into a project: build a large lego model, and remove the parts one at a time - taking a picture after each step.  Then stitch the photos together backwards to make a movie of the model being built
  14:39 < dj> memcmp ?
  14:39 < dj> strnstr?
  14:39 < dj> libiberty might have a strnstr if it's not portable enough.
  14:40 < peterbrett> strnstr doesn't exist... but we've determined that it's safe anyway
  14:40 < mcmahill> autom4te: cannot create autom4te.cache: Permission denied
  14:40 < mcmahill> this is wierd.
  14:41 < mcmahill> I ran autogen.sh just 15 minutes ago and it was fine
  14:41 < dj> ls -la ?
  14:41 < Igor2> >pcjc2> i've installed libgd, made clean in both dirs, ran ./configure, make, make install in lib than in gschem
  14:42 < Igor2> and i get the same scm errors at linking
  14:42 < mcmahill> oh, wierd.  Nuking the leftover directory from a failed 'make distcheck' fixed it
  14:44 < mcmahill> ales:  the distcheck problem is because srcdir is exported to the test environment but not top_srcdir.  I'm testing a fix and will commit if it works
  14:44 < pcjc2> Igor: sorry, haven't gone over the log file yet... will do now
  14:44 < Igor2> ok :)
  14:45 < Igor2> i can remove libgd to reproduce the previous setup (for which you have the logs)
  14:45 < pcjc2> its not a problem
  14:45 < Igor2> ok
  14:45 < cnieves> pcjc2: warning: libgd is no longer used by default, if you are using the latest cvs.
  14:47 < peterbrett> http://www.peter-b.co.uk/htdocs/gEDA/optionsmenu.png
  14:48 < peterbrett> Does this look okay? It binds the grid increment/decrement functions to the [ ] keys
  14:48 < Ales> Dan: great thanks.
  14:48 < peterbrett> I mean http://www.peter-b.co.uk/gEDA/optionsmenu.png
  14:48 < peterbrett> Obviously
  14:49 < Ales> that looks okay 
  14:50 < pcjc2> Igor: it appears GUILE_LDFLAGS is missing somewhere
  14:50 < pcjc2> I'll try to see where it comes from
  14:50 < Igor2> :)
  14:52 < cnieves> sdb: I'm getting: (gattrib:6696): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `(null)' in cast to `GtkSheet'
  14:52 < sdb> Carlos, what are you doign when you get that warning?
  14:52 < cnieves> and a segfault when I click on the net tab...
  14:52 < sdb> Oh oh...
  14:52 < cnieves> just loaded a schematic, then loaded another one.
  14:53 < cnieves> those schematics are not numbered, so maybe gattrib is going crazy...
  14:53 < mcmahill> peter:  that netbsd git patch didn't help.  I'm wondering if it is due to it being a 64-bit box.  I'll give it a shot on a 32-bit system first.
  14:53 < cnieves> sdb: I mean refdes in the schematic
  14:53 < sdb> Did you load hte first using file->load and the second using file->load?
  14:54 < mcmahill> unfortunately the whole build system is based around operating system checks, not feature tests.
  14:54 < cnieves> sdb: no, the first one was with the command line, the other using file->load
  14:54 < sdb> OK.
  14:54 < mcmahill> i.e. "if SunOS-5.9 then..." as opposed to "if HAS_SOME_FEATURE then ..."
  14:54 < Ales> that's very 80s. :)
  14:54 < cnieves> sdb: I recall gattrib needs a file with property names... I don't have any
  14:56 < sdb> Carlos, when you say the schematics are not numbered, do you mean no refdeses on the schematics?
  14:57 < sdb> Carlos, gattrib is supposed to check that there is at least one refdes on the schematic.
  14:57 < peterbrett> mcmahill: It probably needs autoconfiscating
  14:57 < sdb> Carlos, it's possible it checks only on the first read-in, and if the first schematic
  14:57 < mcmahill> Ales:  things should work now.
  14:57 < sdb> is OK, then it doesn't check any more.  If that's the case, and you have a non-numbered
  14:58 < sdb> second schematic, I can see that gattrib might get horribly confused.
  14:58 < sdb> Carlos, can you please file a bug on it>
  14:58 < mcmahill> stuart, if you've copied over my run_tests.sh script, you may want to grab the minor changes I just checked in
  14:58 < sdb> Carlos, can you please file a bug on it?
  14:58 < mcmahill> biab
  14:59 < sdb> Dan, thanks, but mine seems to work already.  I wonder if my mods fixed something broken in
  14:59 < sdb> yours?  One problem in the refdes_renum test script is that it wants to use Perl
  14:59 < cnieves> sdb: I mean all components have refdeses, but they are all R?, C?,...
  15:00 < sdb> and that seemse to cause problems.
  15:00 < sdb> Carlos, I'll have to see what gattrib does wiht components numbered R? C? and so on.
  15:02 < cnieves> sdb: wow! I made it segfault again, with a segfault in the terminal looking like:
  15:02 < cnieves> b74a0000-b75db000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 1885434    /lib/libc-2.5.so
  15:02 < cnieves> b75db000-b75dc000 r--p 0013b000 03:02 1885434    /lib/libc-2.5.so
  15:02 < cnieves> (many many lines). I didn't see that before!
  15:02 < cnieves> I'll file a bug report
  15:03 < sdb> Carlos, yes please file a bug report!  Please include what you did to make it work.
  15:03 < dj> ok, crude diagonal element support is in - pads can be diagonal, but no element rotation yet.
  15:03 < sdb> I've been having good luck running gattrib today on normal schematics, so I need to know
  15:03 < sdb> what will break it.
  15:03 < peterbrett> right, food
  15:06 < peterbrett> Ales: On the developers page on the website I'm the only one with a non-obfusticated e-mail address :(
  15:06 < dj> And?
  15:07 < peterbrett> dj: I would very much like some obfusticatization applied, please :D
  15:07 < dj> ;-)
  15:08 < cnieves> sdb: I see two components tabs. Should be only one?
  15:08 -!- Igor2 [~igor2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: good night]
  15:08 < peterbrett> Also, I'm having difficulty working out the right sequence of commands to login as an authenticated CVS user
  15:08 < Ales> peterb: sorry! fixed.
  15:08 < Ales> what is your CVSROOT set to?
  15:09 < peterbrett> :pserver:peterb@xxxxxxxxxxxx:2401/home/cvspsrv/cvsroot
  15:10 < Ales> get rid of the 2401 (shouldn't matter; cvs is running on the default port)
  15:10 < Ales> okay
  15:10 < Ales> did you run cvs login next?
  15:13 -!- mike [~mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  15:13 < cnieves> sdb: bug report filed.
  15:13 < cnieves> hi mike
  15:13 < peterbrett> Ales: PAM authenticate error: User not known to the underlying authentication module
  15:13 < mike> Hi!
  15:13 < Ales> okay
  15:14 < Ales> I've never seen that error message before
  15:14 < dj> "cvs -d <fill in the blank> login" ?
  15:14 < Ales> hi Mike
  15:14 < mike> Hi!
  15:15 < mcmahill> stuart:  it is also possible that your tests work differently enough to not matter
  15:15 < mcmahill> do they work with 'make distcheck'?
  15:18 < sdb> Dan: They work with distcheck.  Ales and I checked that.
  15:19 < sdb> Dan:  They're pretty close to your tests.  A big difference is that I am running
  15:19 < sdb> gnetlist, and not perl, so I don't need to fool around with finding the path
  15:19 < sdb> to perl.
  15:19 < sdb> They run the local gnetlist which has just been built in the geda/gaf/gnetlist/src dir
  15:20 < sdb> I checked all my stuff in, so you can look at it under gnetlist/tests/spice-sdb/
  15:20 < sdb> The files in there should look very familiar:  run_tests.sh and tests.lits
  15:20 < sdb> The files in there should look very familiar:  run_tests.sh and tests.list
  15:21 < sdb> I believe a big problem with distcheck is that it is sensitive to being
  15:21 < sdb> position-independent in the filesystem.
  15:26 < Ales> Dan: make distcheck in utils works.  Thanks!
  15:26 < corycrossq> Is it possible to add gschem-style keybindings to pcb? i.e. 'ed' to delete an element?
  15:27 < mcmahill> sdb:  actually I think thats one of the nice things about distcheck
  15:27 < mcmahill> for example I've been building pcb with both gtk and lesstif hid's from the same source tree so its nice to know it all builds correctly outside of the source tree
  15:27 < Ales> distcheck is awesome. :) particularly when tests are run. 
  15:28 < mcmahill> yeah.  Its nice to catch files missing from the tarballs that way
  15:28 < Ales> and when some file leaves garbage installed
  15:29 < mcmahill> who all showed up at MIT?
  15:29 < Ales> DJ, Stuart, JohnL, and myself
  15:31 < Ales> o_box_basic.c: In function 'o_box_image_write':
  15:31 < Ales> o_box_basic.c:1525: warning: unused variable 's_lower_y'
  15:31 < Ales> ...
  15:31 < dj> cory: you can with lesstif, I think even with Dan's gtk changes you're still limited to single key bindings.
  15:31 < Ales> is that expected?
  15:32 < Ales> and SteveM showed up... :)
  15:32 < dj> you have to use "<Keys>ed" instead of just <Key>
  15:32 < cnieves> Ales: that's surely libgd->gdk-pixbuf variable which is not used now. Can you put it inside #ifdef HAVE_LIBGD (or something like this).
  15:32 < Ales> sure
  15:32 < Ales> I'll look at it once my build finishes
  15:33 < Ales> thanks
  15:33 < corycrossq> Thanks dj, is someone planning to add double bindings for gtk?
  15:35 -!- Cesar [~Cesar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  15:35 < Cesar> Hello, all.
  15:35 < cnieves> hi Cesar
  15:36 < dj> Dan just added customization yesterday.  One thing at a time.
  15:36 < peterbrett> dj: Patience, young jedi.
  15:36 < peterbrett> ;)
  15:36 < Ales> Hi Cesar
  15:37 < peterbrett> We get the feeling Patrick won't be joining the fun today
  15:37 < sdb> Hi Cesar!
  15:37 < pcjc2> I hope the whole noscreen / merging problem didn't annoy him too much though
  15:38 < Ales> he hasn't said anything for a while.
  15:38 < pcjc2> He mentioned a re-write at least once
  15:38 < pcjc2> I expect he'll be back in touch when its finished ;)
  15:39 < pcjc2> (I mean that in jest of course)
  15:40 < Ales> Carlos: I like how the "Ok" button behaves in the component selection dialog
  15:40 < Ales> that's pretty nifty
  15:41 < cnieves> thanks! :)
  15:42 < corycrossq> dj: I wasn't sure if was easily possible with gtk... but I'm working on enough other stuff without trying to take that on!
  15:42 < dj> Well, with lesstif I ended up trapping the raw key events and processing them myself.  I suppose the gtk code could reuse that.
  15:43 < cnieves> one thing I would like in the component selector is to automatically expand the branches if there is only one component there, or to expand the branch is there is only one...
  15:44 < cnieves> don't know if it is hard or not, though
  15:44 < pcjc2> should be possible
  15:44 < pcjc2> but GtkTreeView is evil stuff
  15:44 < pcjc2> I was working on a custom model which is backed by libgeda data (for the page contents browser idea)
  15:45 < pcjc2> turns out, it requires some quite specific signals to be sent for every model changee
  15:45 < corycrossq> is there a way to set the default size of that window? or remember its last size?
  15:45 < pcjc2> One thing I've found a pain with the component selector (apart from its default size, and the room allocated to the tree), is it not remembering / adjusting position intelligently as it filters
  15:48 < Ales> I'm going to move the directories "geda" and "setup" now and see what happens
  15:49 < Ales> yeah, everybody who has geda/gaf checkout should delete "geda" and "setup"
  15:53 < Ales> reminder e-mail sent to geda-dev
  15:53  * peterbrett sees to what extent this breaks git-cvsimport ;)
  15:55 < Ales> oh sorry
  15:55 < peterbrett> doesn't matter
  15:55 < Ales> let me know if it breaks that too much and I'll put them back
  15:55 < peterbrett> If necessary I'll just hack the commit
  15:56 < Ales> I know how much you like git. :)
  15:56 < peterbrett> ;)
  15:56 < Ales> how bandwidth intenstive is the cvs <-> git sync?
  15:56 < peterbrett> very little
  15:57 < peterbrett> The expense is in cvs.seul.org's CPU time :P
  15:57 < Ales> hmmm
  15:57 < cnieves> I'm going. bye everybody! 
  15:57 < Ales> what if the git repository and the cvs repository were on the same machine?
  15:57 < peterbrett> cnieves: Bye!
  15:57 < pcjc2> bye carlos!
  15:57 < cnieves> it was a nice day as always!
  15:57 < cnieves> :=
  15:57 < Ales> see ya Carlos
  15:57 < cnieves> :)
  15:57 < Ales> thanks for all the checkins!
  15:57 -!- cnieves [~cnieves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Abandonando]
  15:57 < peterbrett> Ales: Then you could do a post-commit hook in CVS to update the git repo
  15:57 < pcjc2> Lots of good coding today - perhaps the most active sprint yet?
  15:58 < Ales> yup
  15:58 < peterbrett> Alternatively, there's a git program that pretends to be CVS
  15:58 < Ales> what about svn <-> git syncing?
  15:58 < peterbrett> yes, that works too
  15:58 < Ales> oh okay
  15:58 < peterbrett> In fact, that works much better
  15:58 < peterbrett> It's CVS --> SVN that's the really dodgy bit
  15:59 < Ales> how cpu intensive would that svn <-> git sync be?
  15:59 < peterbrett> Using git to pretend to be CVS?
  15:59 < Ales> no, just keeping a git repository in sync with svn or cvs
  15:59 < peterbrett> I'm afraid I don't know
  16:00 < peterbrett> Also, yes, moving the history out has broken git
  16:00 < Ales> do you want me to put it back?
  16:00 < peterbrett> It still thinks setup & geda are present
  16:00 < peterbrett> I can't get rid of it, because it'll break the import script
  16:00 < Ales> I really want to toss them, the alternative is that I do do a cvs remove on all the files
  16:01 < Ales> would that be okay?
  16:01 < peterbrett> that'd work fine
  16:01 < Ales> okay, I'll do that now
  16:01 < peterbrett> Because there'd be a CVS commit git would pick up
  16:01 < peterbrett> If the history's just removed, git never realizes they've gone
  16:01 < Ales> okay, it's back... does git work okay now?
  16:02 < Ales> ^it's^they are
  16:02 < peterbrett> No difference, no point in even checking ;)
  16:02 < Ales> okay, lemme remove all the files
  16:02 < peterbrett> If you back up the rcs files, then cvs rm them, then reinstate the rcs files in the new home?
  16:02 < peterbrett> Would that work?
  16:02 < Ales> I'll just copy the directories instead of moving them
  16:06 < pcjc2> Ales: http://www.pastebin.ca/451742
  16:06 < pcjc2> just compiling to check
  16:07 -!- Levente [~Levente@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has left #geda [Going to sleep]
  16:07 < peterbrett> I can't believe how long `cvs diff` takes :(
  16:10 < Ales> peter, I cvs remove'd setup and geda, so that shouldn't break git
  16:10 < peterbrett> Thx, appreciate it
  16:11 < pcjc2> In gschem, I've found: 
  16:11 < Ales> peterC: patch looks good
  16:11 < pcjc2> x_dialog.c: In function â??close_confirmation_dialog_constructorâ??:
  16:11 < pcjc2> x_dialog.c:3857: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
  16:11 < Ales> I will test once you commit it
  16:11 < pcjc2> not related to my change, but there are a bug or two yet 
  16:11 < Ales> as I have a keyboard with 0x0 keysyms
  16:11 < pcjc2> key_value rather than key_name by accident in a place or two
  16:12 < pcjc2> I've got one two, so will get on
  16:13 < pcjc2> Also: x_menus.c: In function â??gettext_fnâ??:
  16:13 < pcjc2> x_menus.c:241: warning: return discards qualifiers from pointer target type
  16:13 < jpd> I believe I now have a gnetlist back end for Osmond PCB Design.
  16:13 < pcjc2> are these from commits today? I don't recall seeing them before
  16:14 < Ales> I don't recall seeing those either
  16:14 < jpd> Sent a netlist to an Osmond user at MIT Kavli to test.
  16:14  * peterbrett tests git-cvsimport
  16:15 < jpd> Ales, I'll send it to you once it's tested.
  16:15 < Ales> great thanks
  16:17 -!- rikster [~rik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  16:18 < peterbrett> wb rikster 
  16:18 < peterbrett> Ales: You did cvs rm, then commit, didn't you?
  16:19 < peterbrett> And you left the rcs files there?
  16:19 < peterbrett> Or did you cvs rm, commit, then delete the rcs files?
  16:20 < peterbrett> You need to have left the rcs files there long enough for me to run the tools!
  16:20 < peterbrett> Then you can delete them.
  16:22 < Ales> I did a cvs remove; cvs commit
  16:22 < Ales> and left the rcs files there
  16:22 < peterbrett> Wierd
  16:22 < peterbrett> s/ie/ei/
  16:22 < Ales> the rcs files will always be there
  16:24 < mcmahill> please, no removing of rcs files!
  16:24 < Ales> no rcs files have been removed. :)
  16:25 < mcmahill> unless someone checked in something which causes legal problems...
  16:26 < peterbrett> I still get lots of "is no longer in the repository" stuff
  16:26 < Ales> could somebody here run a cvs update -dP  and make sure it completes okay
  16:26 < peterbrett> (when I do cvs up -CdP)
  16:28 < peterbrett> [peter@ptbb2b gaf]$ cvs log geda/src/window.h
  16:28 < peterbrett> cvs [log aborted]: no such directory `geda/src'
  16:28 < mcmahill> stuart?
  16:28 < peterbrett> [peter@ptbb2b gaf]$ cvs rlog geda/src/window.h
  16:28 < peterbrett> cvs rlog: cannot chdir to /home/cvspsrv/cvsroot/eda/geda/src: No such file or directory
  16:30 < peterbrett> Ales, I think you broke it
  16:30 < pcjc2> I'm about to check in the fix for gdk_keyvalue_name bug - is this a bad time?
  16:31 < sdb> I just did a cvs update -d -P, and it worked fine for me.
  16:31 < sdb> Dan, I'm here.  What's up?
  16:32 < mcmahill> I took a look at the spice-sdb tests.  Turns out my bug is there and you introduced another and they cancel...
  16:33 < mcmahill> Unless you object, I'm going to remove both bugs
  16:33 < peterbrett> Ales: Sorry for blaming you, cvsps is a buggy PoC
  16:33 < Ales> is it working now?
  16:33 < peterbrett> Not certain, but I have made sure I can see history for the stuff you moved
  16:34 < Ales> okay
  16:34 < mcmahill> top_srcdir isn't being set correctly to top_srcdir (my fault), but thats good becuase you're using that to find the path to the compiled gnetlist which is also a bug
  16:34 < sdb> Dan, what are the two bugs which canceled?  And if you know what the problem is,
  16:34 < dj> my cvs update seems to have worked correctly.
  16:34 < sdb> how would you feel about fixing it in my stuff?  :-)
  16:34 < Ales> yeah, please fix, so I can steal the fix too for my stuff :)
  16:35 < Ales> as I'm not running the newly built gnetlist in my tests (but rather just the installed one)
  16:35 < Ales> which is wrong
  16:35 < dj> Feel free to fix my stuff too ;-)
  16:35 < sdb> Dan,  I'll fix my stuff by copying what you do.  Just let me know
  16:35 < sdb> when you're done.
  16:36 < Ales> PeterC: yeah, now was/is a good time to check stuff in
  16:36 < pcjc2> done
  16:36 < mcmahill> sdb:  I fixed yours (I think).  I'll check it in after I do a trial 'make distcheck'
  16:36 < Ales> great thanks
  16:37 < sdb> Dan, thanks!!!
  16:37 < mcmahill> here's a question.
  16:38 < mcmahill> for gentlist, do you think the backends are sufficiently different that we have to have a different run_tests.sh script for each?
  16:38 < mcmahill> or could there be an extra field in tests.list which specifies the backend?
  16:38 < sdb> Naw, they
  16:38 < Ales> if it could be generalized, that'll be okay
  16:38 < sdb> Naw, they're quite different.
  16:39 < mcmahill> It seems like fundamentally all we do is 1) copy over some files 2) run gnetlist 3) check some files against outputs
  16:39 < sdb> Ales and I differ on this one!
  16:39 < mcmahill> oh, and maybe check gnetlists result code
  16:39 < sdb> THere are also different flags to set, and they don't work the same on all 
  16:39 < mcmahill> but you make that a field
  16:39 < sdb> backends.  (At least spice-sdb is different)
  16:40 < Ales> my mechanism was first! :)
  16:40 < sdb> I'll let you and Ales decide.  In my opinion (and limited experience), a test suite 
  16:41 < mcmahill> testname | files to copy | output files to check | return code | extra gnetlist flags
  16:41 < sdb> always becomes grotesquely complicated and becomes hard to stuff into a generalized
  16:41 < Ales> what if I have special diff flags?
  16:41 < sdb> format.
  16:41 < Ales> like I have for spice-sdb diffs. :)
  16:41 < dj> pcb now has FreeRotateBuffer(<angle>) :-) :-)
  16:42 < corycrossq> woohoo!
  16:42 < dj> Not sure how much of the rest of pcb will work with it though.
  16:43 < peterbrett> lol
  16:43 < peterbrett> Here's a new challenge for you dj
  16:43 < peterbrett> Add a autofanout tool :D
  16:43 < dj> still working on the old challenges
  16:43 < peterbrett> ;)
  16:43 < dj> You can put fanouts in the .fp file
  16:43 < peterbrett> dj: Including via grid?
  16:44 < peterbrett> dj: Won't it think they're pins?
  16:45 < peterbrett> Ales: git repo ist gefixt!
  16:45 < peterbrett> Ales: thanks for helping :D
  16:46 < dj> Because of the way pcb loads footprints, you can include non-footprint data too, and it gets merged into the schematic.
  16:46 < dj> There's a msp430 with jtag in the pcb library that shows this.
  16:47 < Ales> peterb: cool.  glad that I didn't break it too much. :)
  16:50 < corycrossq> dj:did you checkin the FreeRotateBuffer?
  16:50 < peterbrett> Ales: To be honest, trying to use git-cvsimport to track CVS is severe brokenness in itself.  It's designed for a one-off approximate import
  16:51 < mcmahill> stuart?
  16:51 < mcmahill> whats the -I "gnetlist -g" part of the diff command for?
  16:52 < pcjc2> Ales, can you confirm fixedness with the NULL keynames?
  16:52 < mcmahill> -I is non standard
  16:52 < mcmahill> oh wait... there is a comment saying why.  duh
  16:52 < sdb> -I is nonstandard, yes.  -I is used by spice-sdb to insert a .include file
  16:53 < dj> Yup, but it's not bound to any keys.  You have to use ":FreeRotateBuffer(45)" for example.
  16:53 < sdb> diretive instead of an entire file when you create a SPICE netlist.
  16:53 < mcmahill> not to gnetlist, -I to the diff command
  16:53 < mcmahill> but I see why.
  16:53 < mcmahill> gnetlist puts in a full path to the command
  16:53 < mcmahill> or at least the spice-sdb backend does
  16:54 < mcmahill> but unfortunately diff on solaris doesn't understand -I.
  16:54 < sdb> Ales says that the -I is his work.
  16:54 < corycrossq> is this the right server for pcb? :pserver:anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/cvsroot/pcb
  16:54 < mcmahill> cory I think so
  16:54 < Ales> Dan: how do you suggest we handle this then?
  16:54 < corycrossq> thanks dan
  16:55 < sdb> -I in gnu diff ignores a regexp
  16:55 < mcmahill> use sed to eat that line or change /full/path/to/gnetlist to just gnetlist
  16:55 < sdb> What's the equivalent in sun?
  16:55 < mcmahill> there is none.
  16:55 < mcmahill> solaris userland sucks
  16:55 < Ales> use a different OS. :)
  16:55 < sdb> Naw, don't use full path to gnetlist, since it will alwyas be different.
  16:56 < Ales> peterc: yes, I'll test it out
  16:56 < sdb> Dan, the -I is used to ignore the first line of any generated SPICe file.
  16:57 < sdb> In spice-sdb, I used the first -- comment -- line to write out argv[0] for the
  16:57 < sdb> user's convenience.
  16:57 < sdb> The problem is that the golden files then have a position and system dependent comment line
  16:58 < sdb> in the first line.  We need a way to make diff ignore the first line.
  16:58 < mcmahill> ok.  I fixed it
  16:58 < mcmahill> just verifying distcheck again before I check it in
  17:00 < Ales> Dan: I'll update my stuff based on how you fixed yours
  17:00 < mcmahill> ok
  17:00 < dj> angled elements: drc, gerber, ps, eps all work.  png needs the same square-pad code that gerber needed.
  17:01 < jpd> Stuart, why not leave the first line off the golden files.
  17:02 < jpd> Strip from test files with sed -e 1d or some such?
  17:03 < corycrossq> dj: works for me (didn't know I had to add -P to my update)
  17:03 < corycrossq> anything you want tested?
  17:03 < dj> Er, everything ;-)
  17:03 < dj> autoroute might be useful, and the optimizers.
  17:05 < dj> http://www.delorie.com/tmp/tqfp-dip.html
  17:05 < mcmahill> jpd:  thats basically what I just did
  17:05 < mcmahill> stripped off the offending line
  17:06 < Ales> PeterC: keysym patch seems to work okay
  17:06 < corycrossq> square pads of pins aren't rotate (didn't think they would be)
  17:06 < dj> I think the HID has an option for specifying that, but we currently have no reference for determining the angle.
  17:07 < dj> At least for square *pads* we know the angle.
  17:07 < dj> OTOH octagon pins will work at 45's :-)
  17:09 < sdb> Dan, did you modify run_tests to strip the first line from the golden files?
  17:09 < sdb> I just ask since I would just like to run run_tests --regen to recreate
  17:09 < sdb> everything.
  17:09 < mcmahill> sdb:  actually I just ignored those same lines
  17:09 < mcmahill> but if you do --regen, that line will indeed be dropped
  17:10 < mcmahill> it is checked in if you want to see
  17:10 < mcmahill> Ales?
  17:10 < mcmahill> cp -f $(SRCDIR)/gnetlistrc.vhdl $(BUILDDIR)/gnetlistrc
  17:10 < mcmahill> that should probably be more like
  17:10 < Ales> ... like?
  17:11 < mcmahill> sed 's;@prefix@;${prefix};g' $(SRCDIR)/gnetlistrc.vhdl $(BUILDDIR)/gnetlistrc
  17:11 < Ales> why?
  17:11 < mcmahill> because otherwise it tries to find VHDL symbols in my home directory where the don't live
  17:11 < mcmahill> and the tests fail
  17:11 < Ales> it does?
  17:11 < mcmahill> (component-library "${HOME}/geda/share/gEDA/sym/vhdl")
  17:11 < Ales> crap yeah
  17:11 < Ales> sorry
  17:12 < mcmahill> ;)
  17:12 < corycrossq> autoroute is giving errors
  17:12 < mcmahill> no problem
  17:12 < Ales> I will fix that
  17:12 < mcmahill> thanks.
  17:12 < corycrossq> I'll give some more details in a minute
  17:12 < mcmahill> I have to get back to my bathroom wall before my wife catches me here...
  17:13 < mcmahill> can't code with broken fingers ;)
  17:13 < rikster> Since the last code sprint I submitted two tiny patches to SourceForge that improve printing.
  17:13 < rikster> Any chance someone with CVS check-in authority could take a quick glance and finish off 1680214 and 1680168.
  17:13 < Ales> hmmm, but ${prefix} isn't set to anything
  17:13 < pcjc2> I've refreshed the patch for new page code (locally) to work round the fix already in CVS
  17:14 < Ales> I will fix it so that it does the right thing
  17:14 < Ales> the gnetlistrc.vhdl
  17:14 < dj> We might have to ask Harry to fix the autorouter.
  17:15 < sdb> corycrossq:  mike should check those in since he's the gschem printing guru
  17:15 < corycrossq> dj: I took a board I made before, and moved a 4-pin surface mount dip off to a blank area, and optimized with no errors
  17:15 < sdb> corycrossq, if Mike doesn't do it after a few days (and we can bug him a little bit
  17:15 < sdb> first) then I can do it.
  17:15 < mike> Hi,  lurking here.. I will look at  1680168.
  17:16 < rikster> thanks mike
  17:16 < corycrossq> then rotated 37 degrees, optimizing gives me a shorted net error
  17:16 < mike> I think we should put orientation in there regardless.
  17:16 < corycrossq> great
  17:16 < mike> The old code emitted << setpage-orientation ...>> code when enabled.  Telling the printer to rotate the page.
  17:17 < peterbrett> Hmm, our internets seem to have disappeared
  17:17 < mike> I fixed the output to rotate itself, making this redundant.
  17:19 < corycrossq> dj: would you like me to send you a test case?
  17:20 < pcjc2> brb... router is borked
  17:21 < dj> If it's small, post an URL to it on geda-dev
  17:23 -!- pcjc3 [~pcjc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  17:23 < pcjc3> am I still here?
  17:23 -!- peterbrett_ [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  17:24 < peterbrett_> Hmm
  17:24 < peterbrett_> Interesting
  17:24 < pcjc3> will probably have to wait for our old IP to timeout before I can be pcjc2 again!
  17:25 -!- swm_ [~swm@xxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  17:26 < sdb> Hi Steve!
  17:26 < swm_> Hi Stuart
  17:26 < Ales> everybody is asking... what did you do with pcjc1 !?!!??!?!!
  17:26 < pcjc3> Cambridge reserve "0", "1", "10", "100" etc... for important people
  17:26 < pcjc3> There is no pcjc1
  17:28 < Ales> really? wow. :)
  17:28 -!- You're now known as Ales1
  17:28 < Ales1> :)
  17:28 < sdb> Better than being a zero
  17:28 -!- dj is now known as dj0
  17:28 -!- dj0 is now known as dj-1
  17:28 < dj-1> Ha!
  17:28 < sdb> Naw, I think Ales won (1).
  17:29 < sdb> Ok, I'm leaving now.
  17:29 < dj-1> On that happy note, time to wrap it up here
  17:29 < peterbrett_> I'm going to be leaving here soon (it's almost 11 pm here)
  17:29 < Ales1> yeah, it's time to move on... :(  
  17:29 < Ales1> this has been most successful.
  17:29 < dj-1> Bye all!  Have run with the rotated footprints :-)
  17:29 < peterbrett_> Ales1: Yeah, it's been good
  17:29 < peterbrett_> When's the next one?
  17:29 < Ales1> 94 commit messages
  17:30 -!- You're now known as Ales
  17:30 < dj-1> Next sprint is slated for June, at my house again.  No specific date yet.
  17:30 < peterbrett_> 45 patchsets committed
  17:30 -!- rikster [~rik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Thanks all.  See ya in June.]
  17:31 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Ping timeout: 620 seconds]
  17:31 < Ales> have fun everybody, see ya around
  17:31 -!- pcjc2 [~pcjc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Ping timeout: 633 seconds]
  17:31 < sdb> By everybody!  Thanks for coming!  
  17:31 -!- sdb [~sdb@xxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  17:31 -!- dj-1 [~dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  17:31 < swm_> bye
  17:31 -!- swm_ [~swm@xxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  17:32 < Ales> I'll post the sprint log later tonight!
  17:32 < pcjc3> Ales, if no objections, I'll commit the new page fix
  17:32 < Ales> peter: go right ahead
  17:33 < pcjc3> I've split out the white-space re-indenting fixes to o_undo.c to apply separately - keep things a tiny bit cleaner
  17:33 < Ales> cool. later
  17:35 < pcjc3> bye!
  17:40 < mike> I fixed SF#1680214 for Rikster.
  17:40 -!- peterbrett_ is now known as peterbrett
  17:41 -!- pcjc3 is now known as pcjc2
  17:41 < peterbrett> mike: Shall I close the bug?
  17:42 < mike> It works for me, but you should verify that for yourself, in case I borked something.
  17:42 < peterbrett> You've committed it?
  17:43 < peterbrett> Can you comment on the tracker to that effect? I can't test it now, I'm about to leave
  17:43 < peterbrett> Bye!
  17:43 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  17:55 -!- ivan [~ivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
  18:03 < mike> There, 1680168 is fixed too.
  18:08 < mcmahill> cory?
  18:08 < corycrossq> Yes?
  18:09 < mcmahill> did DJ fix your bug with shorted nets and rotated components?
  18:09 < corycrossq> Not to my knowledge, I brought it up right before he left
  18:09 < mcmahill> ok.
  18:10 < mcmahill> is there an easy way for me to grab that out of pastebin, or just cut and paste?
  18:10 < corycrossq> Right above where you type in a comment, there is a raw link
  18:11 < mcmahill> ah I see it.
  18:11 < mcmahill> ok, this is related to rotated pads?
  18:11 < corycrossq> Yes
  18:11 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has joined #geda
  18:11 < mcmahill> ugh.
  18:11 < mcmahill> I am not suprised
  18:12 < mcmahill> not at all
  18:12 < peterbrett> right, got home safely :)
  18:12 < pcjc2> hello again
  18:12 < mcmahill> I'll try to take a look "soon", but it promises to be somewhat involved
  18:13 < mcmahill> are you at all familiar with that part of the code?
  18:13 < corycrossq> I figured, no worries from me
  18:13 < corycrossq> No
  18:13 < peterbrett> context?
  18:13 < mcmahill> pcb connection code
  18:13 < peterbrett> ewww...
  18:13 < corycrossq> and rotation
  18:14 < mcmahill> basically there are a bunch of routines that do things like see if a circle and a rectangle touch or a rectangle and a rectangle or a line drawn with a circular aperture and a pad and .....
  18:14 < mcmahill> and on top of that the routines are supposed to be able to see in the 2 things in question would touch if you grew one by some number (the minimum drc gap)
  18:15 < pcjc2> ewww...
  18:15 < mcmahill> as you might imagine, there are many assumptions in that code about rotations (or rather lack thereof)
  18:15 < pcjc2> ( I thought connection tracking code in gschem was complex - will be more so when I get round to the on-the-fly page / circuit netlist creation )
  18:16 < corycrossq> it assumes all smt pads are vertical or horizontal?
  18:16 < mcmahill> in my mind, that part of the code could really use some good hooks for a thorough self test
  18:16 < mcmahill> cory:  yep.
  18:16 < mcmahill> take for example 2 rectangular pads.
  18:17 < mcmahill> the code currently first decides if the closest line is one perpendicular to one of the pads or it if is from the corners
  18:17 < mcmahill> then it uses that result to calculate distance
  18:17 < mcmahill> but if you have arbitrary rotations, that particular algorithm doesn't work
  18:17 < mcmahill> don't get me wrong, I really want to see all that code fixed and working
  18:18 < corycrossq> you start to get into a lot of computational complexity when you add in arbitrary rotations and shapes
  18:19 < mcmahill> I wonder if it is really cpu complex or just for the person who has to think a lot about geometry
  18:19 < mcmahill> there is a lot of room for errors in thinking
  18:20 < mcmahill> like the case of 2 rectangles and checking if you'll get a short if you grow one by the drc minimum gap
  18:20 < mcmahill> the old code used to just grow one pad into a larger rectangular pad
  18:20 < mcmahill> works everywhere but at the corner where you actually increase a dimension by sqrt(2) too much...
  18:21 < corycrossq> at least it's in a 'safe' direction
  18:21 < mcmahill> no promises, but I do have an interest in fixing up that part of the code.  I just can project when I might actually get it done
  18:22 < mcmahill> there are some patches on SF which look like they address at least some of these issues too.
  18:22 < mcmahill> I've been dragging my feet a little just because it will take a good bit to test it all out
  18:22 < mcmahill> you know, I think my next project is going to be trying to make some of that code more unit testable
  18:23 < mcmahill> then I can feel good about any improvements there.
  18:23 < corycrossq> would make it a lot easier to develop that code
  18:24 < mcmahill> biab
  18:25 < corycrossq> I'm building a parts database/manager for work; in order to prevent having a new symbol for each part, I'll need to build a mapping function into gsch2pcb
  18:26 < corycrossq> I think that's all the work I'll be able to contribute for a while, in addition to footprints and my footprint generator
  18:26 < pcjc2> "all"
  18:27 < pcjc2> sounds great to me
  18:28 < pcjc2> Mike: Are now those patches are committed, is there anything we can close on the trackers?
  18:33 < corycrossq> well, I certainly wouldn't mind cleaning up the footprint database, but one thing at a time...
  18:54 < jpd> Supper time here in the Rockies, bye.
  18:54 -!- jpd [~jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Quit: Disconnecting]
  18:54 < mike> the patches are comitted
  18:54 < mike> (Pizza is made and in the oven here in Waterloo.)
  18:55 < pcjc2> which numbers want closing in the trackers?
  18:56 < mike>  1680214 and 1680168, but they should be independently verified.
  19:20 < mcmahill> cory, where do you work?
  19:21 < corycrossq> Oh, I forgot gnetlist is the program I'd have to modify to add arbitary symbol->part mappings
  19:21 < corycrossq> Small company in Seattle, Component Engineering
  19:22 < corycrossq> They needed an engineer with CAD experience; they were using Eagle *shudder* my wrist still cringes from the mouse usage
  19:23 < corycrossq> Will gnetlist be the favored netlister for a while?
  19:23 < pcjc2> should be
  19:23 < corycrossq> great
  19:23 < mcmahill> My feeling is that gnetlist should always be.
  19:23 < pcjc2> Steve Meier has a version (basically a fork) which does hierarchical buses
  19:23 < mcmahill> but hopefully over the next year it will become much better than what we have now
  19:24 < pcjc2> And there is gnetman (but I'm not sure it fits in the picture)
  19:24 < mcmahill> gnetman is more geared to spice simulation for larger chip designs
  19:24 < pcjc2> Peter B and myself have done / are doing some design work to improve the netlisting data-structures and that side of things
  19:24 < pcjc2> (I'm hoping at some stage to make libgeda track "netlist" connectivity at least at a per-page level, on the fly.
  19:25 < mcmahill> speaking of yours and peters work...
  19:25 < pcjc2> This shouldn't affect the part->symbol mapping side of things
  19:25 < pcjc2> yes..
  19:25 < mcmahill> did you guys have any thoughts about getting information back out of pcb?
  19:25 < mcmahill> specifically in the dbus world?
  19:25 < corycrossq> pcjc2: just the answer I was looking for :) thanks
  19:26 < mcmahill> I've been wondering if there should just be some fd that actions which provide information can write to
  19:26 < pcjc2> the DBus support I added to PCB supports an integer return code from every action
  19:26 < pcjc2> but it is hard coded at 0 for now, as the actions don't return codes
  19:26 < mcmahill> thats one thing which has bothered me for a while
  19:26 < pcjc2> This is bad for things like asking PCB to file->open something, or to run an action script
  19:26 < mcmahill> on one hand we have all these actions and can script many things
  19:26 < mcmahill> but as you clearly know, you never know if anything worked
  19:27 < mcmahill> and forget about asking for some data to come back
  19:27 < pcjc2> I did hack a version which gave return values (to stdout), but the most immediate problem was just knowing the action had finished. DBus does that for us
  19:27 < pcjc2> That was the problem in xgsch2pcb
  19:27 < pcjc2> we used files on disk for output from PCB
  19:28 < pcjc2> we make a backup copy of the PCB, ask PCB to save the current layout to disk
  19:28 < pcjc2> then (when its finished saving), update the layout with xgsch2pcb, and ask PCB to reload it
  19:28 < mcmahill> While I was framing my shower I was thinking that an action which simply tells you the minimum space between any copper in a design could be used to do a pretty good testsuite of the connection code
  19:28 < pcjc2> assuming the units are suitably defined, that fits well with the current integer return value setup
  19:29 < pcjc2> In some respects, the DBus interface I implemented was a half-way house
  19:29 < mcmahill> you'd have a whole bunch of .fp or .pcb files each with some particular combination of things like  two square pads, two circular pads, one each, etc)
  19:29 < pcjc2> it has one method really, which takes a string, which PCB processes as an action
  19:29 < mcmahill> then you'd have an actions script which would load each file, compute the minimum copper distance and write it out, and go to the next.
  19:29 -!- peterbrett [~peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has quit [Ping timeout: 620 seconds]
  19:29 < mcmahill> then you could compare that with the known correct answer
  19:30 < pcjc2> I see the usefulness in terms of checking regressions
  19:30 < mcmahill> this seems like a fairly easy way to really put that bit of code through some real tests.
  19:30 < pcjc2> (Presumably the correct answer is computed with pen+paper, as the test files are designed)
  19:30 < mcmahill> yes
  19:30 < mcmahill> and in most of the cases I can think of, it is easy to calculate by hand
  19:31 < pcjc2> It isn't too much code to script PCB via DBus in a language like Python
  19:31 < mcmahill> like the 2 rectangular pads case
  19:31 < pcjc2> hell, I believe you could do it with the command line tool "DBus-send"
  19:31 < mcmahill> it is obvious to a human where the closest line is
  19:31 < pcjc2> sorry, "dbus-send"
  19:31 < mcmahill> I've actually wondered about pcb --listen
  19:31 < mcmahill> not even do it via dbus
  19:32 < pcjc2> just needs the output mechanism then
  19:32 < mcmahill> just because it relies on nothing but the pcb core
  19:32 < pcjc2> I originally wrote my output to stdout
  19:32 < pcjc2> but that doesn't work so well, as PCB uses stdout too
  19:32 < mcmahill> for the most part, pcb shouldnt' use stdout
  19:32 < pcjc2> I did think of making PCB keep quiet on stdout (except return value), writing any debug stuff to stderr
  19:32 < mcmahill> but I know there are a few places where it still does
  19:33 < mcmahill> but thats why I was wondering about creating a FILE * which is for action output, one for action return code, and one for action error output
  19:34 < mcmahill> then actions whch are supposed to tell you a value, can write to the output .
  19:35 < mcmahill> what I may do is just implement this minimum space action (which would be useful anyway, you could find the minimum gap in your design) and give it some extra arguments that lets you log to a file or stdout
  19:35 < mcmahill> anyway, back to the remodeling for a bit...
  19:35 < mcmahill> oh, cory, that looks like cool stuff you guys do at work
  19:37 < corycrossq> It's a really weird situation, actually. The bosses own 3 businesses and I'm mostly working on other stuff right now
  19:37 < corycrossq> Controllers for wood pellet stoves, to be exact
  19:37 < corycrossq> In addition to coding an inventory system (+ parts db)
  19:38 < corycrossq> argh, at work I'm the only real programmer and I get to do all my work in Lisp and Python... you people and your C :) at least it isn't C++
  19:38 < corycrossq> pcjc2: can you point me in the right direction on where to modify gnetlist for the symbol->part mapping?
  19:39 < pcjc2> dan: this is an example of poking a DBus action in PCB via the command line:
  19:39 < pcjc2> dbus-send --session --dest=org.seul.geda.pcb --print-reply --type=method_call /org/seul/geda/pcb org.seul.geda.pcb.actions.ExecAction string:'foobar' array:string:'blah','foo'
  19:39 < pcjc2> method return sender=:1.80 -> dest=:1.86
  19:39 < pcjc2> (nasty hey!)
  19:39 < pcjc2> Cory: will take a brief look now - but I'm not a great expert on gnetlist
  19:40 < corycrossq> Thanks
  19:40 < corycrossq> Looks like I might be writing some of it in guile
  19:40 < pcjc2> Do you mean symbol->footprint mapping?
  19:41 < pcjc2> (gEDA doesn't currently have any concept of a part)
  19:42 < corycrossq> I'd be inventing that part
  19:42 < pcjc2> The most promising place to look is under scheme/gnet-gsch2pcb.scm
  19:42 < pcjc2> it defines how gnetlist outputs a PCB file from a netlist (as used in gsch2pcb)
  19:42 < pcjc2> s/from a netlist/from a desing/
  19:43 < pcjc2> design (tired... typing going to pieces now)
  19:43 < pcjc2> now this could do with an overhaul anyway
  19:43 < pcjc2> It manually creates a PCB file, and has to "know" PCB's file format
  19:44 < corycrossq> I think if I look in gattrib to see how it gets a list of all unique elements, that should be enough
  19:44 < pcjc2> the "correct" way to do this is to produce a PCB action script, or contact a live running PCB instance - via a pipe, (or via DBus), and let PCB insert the components
  19:44 < pcjc2> gattrib and gnetlist link against libgeda
  19:44 < pcjc2> so in C, it is just a matter of traversing a linked list, and skipping objects of the wrong type
  19:45 < pcjc2> "unique" elements I'm not sure of though
  19:45 < pcjc2> inidentally, at last check, gsch2pcb doesn't handle slotted components well
  19:45 < pcjc2> you can have refdes in PCB IC1a and IC1b, which it considers the same (IIRC)
  19:46 < corycrossq> provided I do this halfway-well, it will replace that
  19:46 < pcjc2> but gsch2pcb drops multiple footprints in the new schematic
  19:46 < pcjc2> replace which bit?
  19:47 < corycrossq> did I fully explain what I'm trying to do?:
  19:47 < pcjc2> I got, parts and inventory db
  19:47 < pcjc2> but perhaps not the full story
  19:48 < corycrossq> well, for the mapping part, I want to be able to place a part ie "analog-comparator-1.sym" in gschem without any footprint or part information
  19:48 < pcjc2> good
  19:49 < corycrossq> if later add in, say, an AVR with a builtin comparator
  19:49 < corycrossq> add in a mapping= attribute for the AVr processor
  19:50 < pcjc2> Thats an intersting concept
  19:50 < corycrossq> the program I'm writing reads the file in the mapping= attrib and builds the netlist to point to the proper pins on the processor
  19:50 < pcjc2> I'm not sure I fully see the use case for it, though - as your output and connections would then be internal to the AVR
  19:51 < pcjc2> I see the point entirely for generic sections of slotted components
  19:51 < pcjc2> But usually, slotted components have all their pins mapped to pins on the "container" if you will
  19:52 < pcjc2> (Perhaps excepting power pins, which are usually done as a separate symbol for the container anyway)
  19:52 < corycrossq> if I begin drawing a schematic with the internal comparator, I then have to change the schematic if I later need those pins for something else
  19:52 < pcjc2> true
  19:52 < corycrossq> but after I draw the whole schematic up, then I can decide if I want to use the internal comparator or a different chip
  19:53 < pcjc2> I guess it depends on what level of schematic you're wanting, functional, or physical
  19:53 < corycrossq> yup
  19:53 < pcjc2> your wiring would be different in both cases though
  19:54 < pcjc2> for the external comparator, your output (and perhaps a pullup resistor, whatever), has to wire to a pin on the AVR (assuming similar functionality to an internal comparator)
  19:54 < pcjc2> so you presumably need to change the schematic a bit if you change from one representation to another
  19:54 < corycrossq> oh, the avr contains an external output
  19:55 < corycrossq> just depends on where I need it
  19:56 < corycrossq> but say you had a circuit of 12 NAND gates, I'd like to bind them in whatever order would lead to the least mess on the pcb
  19:56 < corycrossq> and to whatever chip
  19:57 < pcjc2> sure
  19:57 < pcjc2> I didn't realise the AVR has an uncommited comparator
  19:57 < corycrossq> if you had two chips, one with 4 NAND gates and one with 8 NAND gates you'd have to change the gschem symbol each time they changed
  19:57 < pcjc2> in that case, sure, it is similar to a generics type implementation of slotting
  19:57 < pcjc2> I don't like the way gschem does slotting
  19:57 < pcjc2> your way is much closer to the way I'd expect it to be
  19:58 < pcjc2> the gschem library should have generic parts
  19:58 < pcjc2> possibly labeled with pin names, rather than numbers (V+, V-, Out) etc..
  19:58 < pcjc2> and some way of tagging / grouping these things into components
  19:58 < corycrossq> yup
  19:58 < corycrossq> exactly
  19:58 -!- Cesar [~Cesar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has left #geda []
  19:58 < pcjc2> (parts)
  19:59 < pcjc2> (Without loosing any flexibility in the current way of doing things, nor the freedom to make a straight, "heavy" symbol which is a 1-1-1 symbol<->part<->footprint mapping
  20:00 < pcjc2> has been suggested as a good idea for transistors too
  20:00 < pcjc2> label the BJTs with C B and E
  20:00 < pcjc2> then have a mapping between the footprint numbers and the actual signals
  20:00 < corycrossq> hmm, I'm thinking this should actually be built in scheme and modify the parts right in gschem, communicating with an external program to get the correct mapping= name
  20:00 < corycrossq> I like that
  20:01 < pcjc2> I'm not sure I got the mapping= bit
  20:01 < pcjc2> did you explain that somewhere before?
  20:01 < corycrossq> I'd still have to modify gnetlist though, to check the mapping= attribute
  20:01 < corycrossq> probably not
  20:01 < corycrossq> it'd point to the file that says "C should be pin 1 of SOT-23"
  20:02 < corycrossq> for a particular part
  20:02 < corycrossq> well, particular (part,slot,footprint) tuple
  20:02 < pcjc2> ok
  20:02 < pcjc2> so it could refer to something in the parts database
  20:02 < pcjc2> which says, for example
  20:03 < pcjc2> LM741 opamp: Map opamp:V+ -> pin 2 opamp:V- -> pin 3 (etc..)
  20:03 < pcjc2> and for multiple slots, in a dual / quad opamp etc..
  20:03 < corycrossq> exactly! I must not be crazy if someone's getting the same ideas
  20:04 < corycrossq> s/someone's/someone else's/
  20:04 < pcjc2> I can't recall if I / we ever wrote any of this down
  20:04 < corycrossq> I might've e-mailed a few ramblings once or twice
  20:04 < pcjc2> but a proper parts manager was high on the wish list at CUED, so new users can just drop parts in and have them work
  20:04 < pcjc2> I spent some time "thinking" about these issues, but never got past some of the design challenges
  20:05 < pcjc2> Thinking database wise, taking the NE555 timer as an example
  20:05 < pcjc2> you might have a generic symbol representing NE555 and the derivatives of them
  20:05 < corycrossq> I have a GUI interface to a postgres db waiting for this side to be implemented
  20:06 < pcjc2> in the database, you want a generic 555 timer, with options of PDIP or SOIC etc..
  20:06 < pcjc2> yet also, you might want to link a very specific part in the database, which inherits from the generic one
  20:06 < pcjc2> but adds a specific manufacturers data-sheet, part-number, supplier's stock-code 
  20:07 < corycrossq> heh, that's exactly how I did it
  20:07 < pcjc2> designing the schematic, you want to put in the generic part, but at some stage (producing a BOM, for example), perhaps you need to fill in more specifics about which part-code(s) you're going to use
  20:09 < pcjc2> Problem currently, is gschem works with graphical symbols
  20:10 < pcjc2> It might be possible to add a "parts selector" in parallel with the "symbol selector", which adds things in the schematic which are known to refer to a parts-database for more information
  20:10 < pcjc2> presumably this could basically be a symbol, plus an attribute referencing a part (at whatever level of specialisation) in the database
  20:11 < corycrossq> my workflow would leave that until the schematic is mostly complete visually
  20:11 < pcjc2> ok, so you'd place a fairly generic symbol
  20:12 < pcjc2> Peter Brett and myself looked at a more circuit oriented data-structure for libgeda, something it currently doesn't have much concept of
  20:13 < corycrossq> so I've grasped
  20:13 < pcjc2> The symbols represent electrical entities, instantiations of sub-circuit definitions
  20:13 < pcjc2> I never invisaged the "ports" or "pins" on those symbols corresponding 1:1 with a PCB footprint
  20:14 < corycrossq> Mmhm
  20:14 < pcjc2> If so, the netlists are purely "circuit" based up until the last stage of flattening (or just output, if / when PCB supports hierarchical netlists)
  20:14 < pcjc2> you'd need a mapping which brings this to represent PCB pins
  20:16 < corycrossq> Hmm, I think you just made my job 5000x easier
  20:16 < pcjc2> Currently, I think the magic slot handling is probably too high up in the netlisting - should be lower
  20:17 < pcjc2> (I hope thats not based on me promising to do some coding any time soon... this whole thing is a very slow work in progress!)
  20:17 < corycrossq> no, a simple regex replace on the output netlist might solve hacking gnetlist
  20:18 < pcjc2> and if the netlist format doesn't contain enough formatting / information to make that easy.. you could always make a new scheme backend which has a bit more useful info kept in.
  20:19 < corycrossq> Okay, when I choose a mapping from symbol->part, the program tells gschem to give it a footprint and refdes corresponding to what it should be
  20:19 < corycrossq> the output netlist has things like "U101-V+"
  20:19 < corycrossq> which can easily be changed to U101-5 or whatever
  20:20 < corycrossq> but this wouldn't allow any symbols to share the same pin name
  20:20 < corycrossq> obviously bad, but it would give a good half-way point to have something testable
  20:22 < pcjc2> why can't symbols share the same pin name?
  20:22 < pcjc2> if you have multiple slots of an opamp, say, so there are multiple "V+" etc..?
  20:23 < corycrossq> They should be able to
  20:23 < corycrossq> and will be able to
  20:23 < pcjc2> could get use U101a and U101b to get round it
  20:24 < corycrossq> clever
  20:24 < pcjc2> the convention in PCB is to ignore lower case suffixes
  20:24 < pcjc2> (gsch2pcb doesn't yet - implying they pass through gnetlist intact)
  20:25 < pcjc2> currently, the "a" or "b" bit doesn't define anything magic about which slot is used, its just a refdes. The "slot=???" attribute does the selection work - I guess its that you're looking to extend / replace
  20:27 < corycrossq> I think so
  20:27 < pcjc2> This all sounds very cool - I can't wait to see it
  20:27 < corycrossq> I think I've found how to do this quickly and easily
  20:27 < pcjc2> I really ought to get to bed now... have some data-processing to do tomorrow, lots of graphs to produce for a report.
  20:28 < pcjc2> (I've been "at" this code sprint for about 15 hours now!)
  20:28 < corycrossq> goodnight, thanks for helping; this is going to be much easier than I thought
  20:28 < corycrossq> wow!
  20:28 < pcjc2> We started early in the UK / Europe!
  20:28 < pcjc2> I just failed to go to bed yet
  20:28 < corycrossq> I went to sleep when you were starting
  20:29 < pcjc2> where abouts are you?
  20:29 < corycrossq> west coast usa :) too bad there don't appear to be an asians here, otherwise I'd have more people around to help
  20:30 < pcjc2> gEDA does seem to be predominantly US + Europe
  20:30 < pcjc2> I'm not sure why
  20:31 < pcjc2> I'm sure its not that Linux hasn't got to other places.... I see plenty of Indian programmers on the GTK+ mailing lists
  20:32 < corycrossq> There's certainly lots of circuit board design going on, I wonder what they use?
  20:32 < corycrossq> at work we'll be shipping out some stuff to be manufactured in china, if I get a chance to talk to anyone I'll ask
  20:33 < pcjc2> Lots of software piracy
  20:33 < pcjc2> all the Chinese students at Uni use the very best in commercial software ;)
  20:34 < pcjc2> (I've been told - by people who visit, that you _can't_ buy non-pirated DVDs out there, and software is similar)
  20:34 < corycrossq> they can't be pirating eagle, they're producing far too many products for that to be feasible :)
  20:35 < pcjc2> Orcad
  20:35 < pcjc2> goodness knows
  20:36 < pcjc2> I spoke to some colleagues doing IC mask design (previously with mentor graphics)
  20:36 < pcjc2> they asked their Japanese partners what software they were using (to standardise, as mentor graphics is apparently not available anymore), and the Japanese people reckoned they use software not available here in the UK
  20:37 < pcjc2> possibly some Japanese company
  20:38 < pcjc2> I've never used Eagle
  20:38 < corycrossq> if most engineers don't speak english, it'd almost be easier to write a program from scratch than convert the language of an existing one
  20:38 < pcjc2> it "looks" like its fairly integrated
  20:39 < corycrossq> it is -- until it falls out of sync and doesn't tell you why
  20:39 < pcjc2> (but KiCad looks integrated, and I'd not touch that with a barge pole)
  20:39 < corycrossq> and it's almost only mouse-driven
  20:39 < pcjc2> I'm not against integration - I'm looking to add more interactivity to gEDA (for university use, teaching, simulating circuits etc..)
  20:40 < corycrossq> they at least included a scripting language, but it's unique and I'm not even sure if it's turing-complete
  20:40 < pcjc2> but obviously, one of gEDA's strengths is the ability to separate the tools and design flows
  20:40 < corycrossq> yeah, you might not have any interest in pcb layout, only simulation
  20:41 < pcjc2> From what I saw, they have a big parts library, and a strong community sharing parts
  20:41 < corycrossq> eagle has none of that, for sure
  20:41 < corycrossq> libraries are a mess
  20:41 < pcjc2> (Ours or Eagles)
  20:41 < corycrossq> eagle
  20:41 < pcjc2> (I know ours could be better)
  20:41 < corycrossq> you can't have a symbol in one library file reference a footprint in another file
  20:42 < pcjc2> I can never remember if it was Proteus or Protel I used before - can't stand it
  20:42 < pcjc2> I used EasyPC a very long time ago, but that was back in the days when 386 was powerful, and DOS ruled the PC world
  20:42 < corycrossq> and trying to keep libraries synced with one other person is hard enough -- I can't imagine trying to keep a third person in the loop at work
  20:43 < pcjc2> a database is a good thing to have for this kind of work
  20:43 < corycrossq> I like being able to choose whatever language I want to generate footprints
  20:43 < pcjc2> allows more flexibility in indexing meta-data too, for finding parts
  20:43 < corycrossq> Yup, I'll be able to release the code for that
  20:44 < pcjc2> its unfortunate that postgres is a bit heavy weight to stick as a pre-requisite for every gEDA install
  20:44 < corycrossq> I don't think I'll be able to give work-related parts out
  20:44 < pcjc2> but the hard work is in the database design
  20:44 < corycrossq> sqlite
  20:44 < pcjc2> sqlite or whatever could do the job
  20:44 < pcjc2> (was just typing that - you beat me)
  20:45 < pcjc2> You're using postgres for now though?
  20:45 < corycrossq> I'll draw up my database design nice and purty and post it to the list
  20:45 < pcjc2> fantastic
  20:45 < corycrossq> The GUI I designed uses dabo (dabodev.com) which supports multiple backends
  20:45 < pcjc2> which tools do you see the database integrating with? Or will it be a separate part of the design flow?
  20:46 < corycrossq> but that couldn't go into geda
  20:46 < pcjc2> Licensing?
  20:47 < corycrossq> I see the database as a back-and-forth with gschem and a small script in between gsch2pcb->pcb
  20:47 < corycrossq> no, wxpython
  20:47 < corycrossq> (it's all gpl, or has to be, anyway)
  20:47 < pcjc2> this sounds good
  20:48 < pcjc2> with the database as a "helper" program for gschem?
  20:48 < corycrossq> yes
  20:48 < pcjc2> gschem currently lacks IPC, but I added DBus support to PCB without "much" difficulty
  20:49 < pcjc2> (Actually, its easy for pure GTK / GLib apps, but since PCB doesn't have just one framework, I had to code much more low-level, and roll my own main-loop integration  and support in PCB)
  20:49 < corycrossq> I'm looking to see if I can write everything in guile with a sqlite/postgres backend
  20:49 < pcjc2> If you launch the database helper from gschem, there is always stdin/out and pipes etc..
  20:49 < corycrossq> Heh, I remember reading about your pain
  20:50 < pcjc2> Looking back on it
  20:50 < pcjc2> it would have been better (I think) to make GLib a requirement of PCB, and tie the Lesstif mainloop into the GLib one (not too hard).
  20:50 < pcjc2> It just not likely it would be accepted politically!
  20:52 < corycrossq> can guile create windows from gschem?
  20:52 < pcjc2> I don't expect so
  20:52 < pcjc2> There might be API for creating a message box, but I can't remember 
  20:53 < pcjc2> (I steer clear of the guile bits where possible!)
  20:53 < corycrossq> darn, I'll have to hack some C
  20:53 < pcjc2> there is / was an old binding for GTK in guile
  20:53 < pcjc2> but gschem doesn't use it
  20:53 < pcjc2> and I don't recall it being particularly up-to-date. Not even sure it does GTK+-2.0 onwards
  20:54 < corycrossq> according to my quick apt search, there's been a name change, but there is a library for it
  20:54 < pcjc2> thats probably why a helper app is a nice way to do it - can launch whatever toolkit / GUI you want. (Guile can handle process spawning and IPC via pipes etc..)
  20:55 < corycrossq> is python a requirement at all?
  20:55 < pcjc2> GWave used GTK in Guile, and its almost dead because it never got off GTK1.0
  20:55 < pcjc2> its used by some of the tools, such as Stuart's installer CD
  20:56 < pcjc2> And our "toy" project manager front-end for gsch2pcb (xgsch2pcb) uses Python and GTK
  20:56 < corycrossq> sweet, that's what I'll be doing
  20:56 < pcjc2> gnome-gtk might be the new guile one
  20:56 < pcjc2> bah - guile-gnome0-gtk
  20:57 < corycrossq> yup
  20:57 < pcjc2> we've never "required" it though
  20:57 < pcjc2> I can't remember who I had this discussion with, but various people were keen the parts-manager should not be "inside" gschem too much
  20:57 < corycrossq> my only other choices would be C or perl... neither appetizing
  20:58 < corycrossq> oh, so you could have various part-managers
  20:58 < pcjc2> I've wondered about adding helper-apps to preview footprints and the like before, but never had time to actually do it
  20:58 < pcjc2> Python is pretty sweet for GUI coding
  21:00 < pcjc2> Changing the subject:
  21:00 < pcjc2> http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=161080&ugn=geda&type=prdownload&mode=60day&package_id=181463&release_id=0
  21:00 < pcjc2> thats quite interesting
  21:01 < pcjc2> a surprising number of potential new users / upgrading users per day!
  21:01 < pcjc2> I wonder what changed on 2007-03-18
  21:02 < pcjc2> ok (thats when the download was added)
  21:02 < corycrossq> :)
  21:02 < corycrossq> that's just the cd-rom
  21:02 < pcjc2> Start's installer CD?
  21:03 < corycrossq> I don't know'
  21:03 < corycrossq> yes
  21:04 < pcjc2> From the sourceforge page to the "real" downloads, is 4 clicks
  21:04 < pcjc2> I'm not sure i'd have got that far, if I'd come finding gEDA from sourceforge
  21:04 < corycrossq> it's interesting that 1000 people needed an install cd for linux
  21:04 < corycrossq> I wonder what distros they're using
  21:04 < corycrossq> or is it a livecd too?
  21:04 < pcjc2> I've no idea
  21:05 < pcjc2> takes 5 clicks from SF to find the source to download
  21:05 < pcjc2> I forget what a pain gEDA can be to install - given the CVS checkout just sits in my home-dir, and I build it regularly
  21:06 < corycrossq> that's what debian's for
  21:06 < pcjc2> of course, apt-get install geda-gschem and the related packages is amazingly easy
  21:07 < pcjc2> but the packages in Ubuntu are outdated now
  21:07 < corycrossq> I've been running them until last night
  21:07 < pcjc2> are they stable (I can't remember how many crashers have been fixed since those)
  21:07 < corycrossq> zero problems
  21:08 < pcjc2> cool
  21:08 < pcjc2> there are crashers probably
  21:08 < pcjc2> updating embeded components multiple times (frees some variable it shouldn't, now fixed)
  21:08 < pcjc2> hitting a key which GDK doesn't know the name of in some dialog boxes (string-compares into a NULL pointer, fixed today)
  21:09 < pcjc2> the version installed at the Engineering department is so old, it still has the GSlice bug
  21:10 < pcjc2> but the file-system image the user-terminals boot off is a pain to modify, and the admins don't want to do it
  21:10 < corycrossq> I'll be upgrading to CVS at work too. I'm have a debian server + vnc for the others to use
  21:10 < pcjc2> Instead, they "patch" on top of it with a merged file-system driver (can't recall what thats called). Yuck
  21:10 < corycrossq> yup, if you don't make it easy people won't do it
  21:11 < pcjc2> PCB compiles (and I think works) under windows
  21:11 < corycrossq> with what I'm developing here, I can have the other engineers build the circuit visually, then I can fill in the parts later
  21:12 < pcjc2> gschem can be made to work under Cygwin, but I think a native port would be tricky. Some non-portable routines are called - which could be fixed, but building all the deps, like guile under windows could prove difficult
  21:12 < corycrossq> because generating new symbols and footprints is so arcane right now, I'll scare them away
  21:12 < pcjc2> exactly
  21:12 < corycrossq> and I don't want to use eagle anymore!!!
  21:12 < pcjc2> I just installed an X11 remote connection for my supervisor to use LaTeX and emacs etc.. from his windows box
  21:13 < pcjc2> Might have to switch to VNC
  21:13 < corycrossq> running on my debian machine means only one place to upgrade, and keeps the libraries in sync
  21:13 < pcjc2> XWin32 is dog slow with Gnome. Gnome uses fancy rendering stuff, which is very slow without the XRender extension - and I doubt XWin32 has that
  21:13 < corycrossq> vnc works remarkably well and is simple to install
  21:13 < corycrossq> and the windows client is very small
  21:14 < corycrossq> tightvnc, anyway
  21:14 < pcjc2> I just need to set it up daemon style, so when you connect, it spawns a new Xvnc for someone to login at
  21:15 < pcjc2> (and fix the backup rsync scripts to run, get the software which syncs password files with the main department servers etc...)
  21:15 < corycrossq> That I'd like to know, I'm just going to launch a vnc session for everyone in the office (7 ppl)
  21:15 < pcjc2> I'm not sure if it can be done at present, but I'll try and remember to let you know if I succeed
  21:17 < corycrossq> Right now it feels like they're back in the paper age with the way things are done. look at gerber printouts through transparencies!? wtf
  21:17 < corycrossq> bah, I'm going to go eat
  21:17 < corycrossq> thanks for the help
  21:18 < pcjc2> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=72893
  21:18 < pcjc2> night!
  21:19 -!- pcjc2 [~pcjc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has left #geda []
  21:49 -!- mike [~mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] has left #geda []
  22:10 < mcmahill> I've been fairly happy with moving back to real VNC from tight VNC
  22:10 < mcmahill> they've sped things up a good bit since the earlier days
  22:15 < Ales> yeah tight vnc is nice
  22:15 < Ales> I haven't tried real vnc in a while
  22:38 < Ales> okay, code sprint over. :)
  22:38 < Ales> time to post the sprint log
  
  
  

_______________________________________________
geda-cvs mailing list
geda-cvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-cvs