[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:12:13 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:50:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <200604191424.k3JEOlKe005231@envy.delorie.com>
References: <20060414105803.GA29029@kestrel> <200604141208.k3EC8TiM008828@envy.delorie.com> <20060419131220.GA2852@kestrel.barix.local> <200604191424.k3JEOlKe005231@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:24:47AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > No you don't. The postscript output doesn't contain any occurence
> > of the word "setcolorspace".
> 
> It doesn't have to.  setgray and setrgbcolor also set the colorspace.
> setcolorspace is only needed if you call setcolor, which we don't.

OK understand. However I still wonder if the PostsCript actually defines
a device-independent shade of gray (this is quite easy to define
physically as a fraction of white photon flux).

CL<

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
  - From: Karel Kulhavy
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB produces invalid postscript
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread