Re: gEDA-user: Patch to PCB build system needs testing/feedback

[Ineiev <ineiev@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi;

On 4/18/10, Jared Casper <jaredcasper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it makes the build much cleaner and readable overall and, more
> importantly, makes the errors and warnings much easier to see.

Actually, I don't think so; the build itself does not change, the readability
arguably decreases (I'll need an extra step to switch on the full mode).

> I decided to send it here instead of the patch tracker for two
> reasons:  1) Feedback to see if people like this style of build
> output.  2) Testing.  I don't have a box that has autoconf > 2.60 and
> automake < 1.11 (I either have servers that have been up for ever and
> still on autoconf < 2.60 or desktops that are very up to date and have
> automake >= 1.11.)  I'd be surprised if it broke things with automake
> < 1.11, but that needs testing.

It works for me with autoconf-2.63, automake-1.10.2; that is, nothing changes.

Some of patches from my collection will need to be rebased manually,
but I have no other objections.

Thanks,
Ineiev


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user