Re: gEDA-user: weird names in PCB part library

[Dave McGuire <mcguire@neurotica.com>]

On Aug 20, 2004, at 11:04 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> > If I had my druthers, we'd deprecate that entire M4 symbol library, 
> > and
> > move to the file based library.  Eventually, we'd kill the M4 library
> > altogether.
> >
> > Any benefit of using an M4 script to generate symbols can be
> > replicated using Perl or Python.  M4 should be banashed.
>   Parameterized footprint generation is a macro processing task.  M4 
> is a macro processor.  Perl is a scripting language.
>
>   Regardless of your personal dislike for M4, it is the correct tool 
> for the job (far more so than a scripting language like Perl, or even 
> a *good* scripting language like Python), and it works quite well.  
> The problem here is one of maintenance, not of implementation.
  (Blargh...I didn't intend for that to sound as snotty as it did; I 
haven't had any caffeine yet today..  -Dave)

--
Dave McGuire             "...it's a matter of how tightly
Cape Coral, FL             you pull the zip-tie."       -Nadine Miller