[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: geda-user Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68. added the code for the footprint of TO92 message 3
----- Original Message -----
From: <geda-user-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:14 AM
Subject: geda-user Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68
> Send geda-user mailing list submissions to
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> geda-user-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> geda-user-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of geda-user digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Defaults for mask and clearance of pcb footprints?
> (Stefan Salewski)
> 2. Looking for 3-pin footprints (7.5 mm Film Dielectric
> Trimmers) (Stefan Salewski)
> 3. footprint (Vincent Onelli)
> 4. Re: footprint (phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> 5. Re: gEDA/gaf 20070526 released! (gene)
> 6. Re: Unwanted compent markings (Kai-Martin Knaak)
> 7. Re: Unwanted compent markings (Kai-Martin Knaak)
> 8. Re: pcb vendor drill mapping not changing the report info ?
> (armdeveloper)
> 9. Second feature request for pcb... (armdeveloper)
> 10. Re: pcb vendor drill mapping not changing the report info ?
> (armdeveloper)
> 11. Re: pcb vendor drill mapping not changing the report info ?
> (John Luciani)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:29:18 +0200
> From: Stefan Salewski <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: gEDA-user: Defaults for mask and clearance of pcb footprints?
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1185726558.5157.14.camel@AMD64X2>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hello,
>
> I read the footprint creation guide
> http://www.brorson.com/gEDA/land_patterns_20050129.pdf
> some months ago, but currently I can not remenber what the defaults for
> mask and clearance are and where these are defined. Please give me a
> pointer.
>
> Thanks
>
> Stefan Salewski
>
>
> Fri, 1 Jun 2007 21:20:45 -0700 Ben Jackson wrote:
>
>>I initially set the mask and clearance manually, but then I took them
>>out and accepted the default, since I have no experience tuning those.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:24:36 +0200
> From: Stefan Salewski <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: gEDA-user: Looking for 3-pin footprints (7.5 mm Film
> Dielectric Trimmers)
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1185733476.5157.22.camel@AMD64X2>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Before I try to make my own:
> Are 3-pin footprints for trimmer capacitors available for gEDA/pcb?
>
> http://www.vishay.com/docs/28527/28180875.pdf
>
> Best regards
>
> Stefan Salewski
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:04:26 -0400
> From: Vincent Onelli <vonelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: gEDA-user: footprint
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <001101c7d256$56b918e0$0301a8c0@youra9279112e3>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hello,
> I try to generate a footprint for transistor TO92 as a simple one for
> start every thing went well, exception when I convert to element the arc
> was not converted, it disappear from the drawing. I appreciate if some
> body can tell me what I am doing wrong, thank you
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user/attachments/20070729/f93f4773/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:38:09 -0400 (EDT)
> From: phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: footprint
> To: "gEDA user mailing list" <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <1591.64.81.161.237.1185781089.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
>> Hello,
>> I try to generate a footprint for transistor TO92 as a simple one for
>> start every thing went well, exception when I convert to element the arc
>> was not converted, it disappear from the drawing. I appreciate if some
>> body can tell me what I am doing wrong, thank you
>
>
> Vincent,
>
> Post the code you're having problems with and you may get more exact
> results.
>
> For Arcs, though, check to make sure that the arc sweep is a realistic
> value along with the line thickness. Also, double check the center point
> of the arc, as if you add a zero to the center coordinates it may end up
> off your screen.
>
> ??
>
> Phil
>
>
Here is the code for the TO92
Element["" "" "" "" 405300 302400 0 0 0 100 ""]
(
Pin[-10000 -4000 7000 3000 7600 2800 "" "1" "edge2"]
Pin[10000 -4000 7000 3000 7600 2800 "" "2" "edge2"]
Pin[0 6000 7000 3000 7600 2800 "" "1" "edge2"]
ElementLine [-17500 2500 -13700 12000 1000]
ElementLine [13500 12000 -13500 12000 1000]
ElementLine [18000 3500 13500 12000 1000]
)
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:42:58 -0400
> From: gene <carzrgr8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gEDA/gaf 20070526 released!
> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <46ADCEC2.8070702@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Ales Hvezda wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am pleased to announce the release of gEDA/gaf 20070526.
>>
>> http://geda.seul.org/devel/20070526
>>
>> Please test it out and if I hear of no major problems in the next
>> few days, I will write up release notes and do the usual release
>> announcements/updates.
>>
>> Many thanks to all the individuals who worked on and contributed to
>> this really juicy release!
>>
>> -Ales
>>
>> PS. md5sum of the release tarballs:
>>
>> b74b22b70f51e654db97f906d5cbaeb9 *geda-docs-20070526.tar.gz
>> 21cffdafdfe97ba9cfdd4be3ae4bdbd4 *geda-examples-20070526.tar.gz
>> 2d3f3d6bdf0c14065ddf2dc647052d57 *geda-gattrib-20070526.tar.gz
>> 2791169bc8987db9a2950214beacde16 *geda-gnetlist-20070526.tar.gz
>> 638be7add265e8aaf86dcf60e56ea7c1 *geda-gschem-20070526.tar.gz
>> bafef3f39036762544dea86495df13c1 *geda-gsymcheck-20070526.tar.gz
>> acb14bf682b2dcfd485f33a9c89dca7e *geda-symbols-20070526.tar.gz
>> 145f2cfa7d85603705bc08bbb35ad4a1 *geda-utils-20070526.tar.gz
>> a9104640475d9fae2f4e8dfa9c18f3fd *libgeda-20070526.tar.gz
>> be8ec17ca7d770aba5c29784887b25b6 *Makefile
>> 85b7e894dfa8a393224bf77f61b3e900 *README
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geda-user mailing list
>> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>
>>
> Builds fine on Slackware 11. Sorry for not getting to it sooner.
> thanks!
>
> gene
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:06:20 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Unwanted compent markings
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <f8kk7s$61l$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:41:57 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>>> Can the labels be fixed/locked to the component? I tend to turn or move
>>> the labels of small SMD parts instead of getting the component itself.
>>
>> Recent pcb's can. In lesstif, it's view->lock names, or in gtk you can
>> :Display(ToggleLockNames)
>
> I modified the menu definition of the gtk GUI so that it contains this
> action too. It wasn't that difficult -- Just two lines of copy-paste from
> the lesstif resource file to src/gpcb-menu.res . Here is the patch:
>
> /----------------------------
> --- gpcb-menu.res 2007-06-21 15:51:42.000000000 +0200
> +++ gpcb-menu.res_orig 2007-06-21 15:55:40.000000000 +0200
> @@ -199,8 +199,6 @@
> {"Thin draw" checked=thindraw Display(ToggleThindraw) a={"|"
> "<Key>|"}}
> {"Thin draw poly" checked=thindrawpoly Display(ToggleThindrawPoly) a=
> {"Ctrl-Shift-P" "Ctrl Shift<Key>p"}}
> {"Check polygons" checked=checkplanes Display(ToggleCheckPlanes)}
> - {"Lock Names" checked=locknames Display(ToggleLockNames)}
> - {"Only Names" checked=onlynames Display(ToggleOnlyNames)}
> -
> {"Vendor drill mapping" ToggleVendor() checked=VendorMapOn}
> }
> \---------------------------------
>
> In other words, just copy the lines that start with
> {"Lock Names...
> and
> {"Only Names...
> above the line that starts with
> {"Vendor drill...
>
> ---<(kaimartin)>---
> --
> Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
> Universit?t Hannover, Inst. f?r Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211
> Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
> GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Unwanted compent markings
> To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <f8km5n$61l$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:44:27 -0700, Andy Peters wrote:
>
>> I suppose I'm so used to the assembly people working from an assembly
>> drawing (w/ refdes only) and a BOM which lists refdeses and our internal
>> part numbers. A part value, especially on something like SMT ceramic
>> caps, isn't all that helpful.
>
> I put the values and of SMD resistors and caps inside the box that mark
> where the component goes. Refdeses simply go on top of the values.
> Because the letters are mostly on the pads, they won't appear on the silk
> screen of the fabricated board --- Font size would be way too small,
> anyway. But assembly printouts can be enlarged to a convenient size.
> With Refdeses and values directly on top of their corresponding
> components there is no room for doubt and ambiguity even if space is
> tight.
>
> ---<(kaimartin)>---
> --
> Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
> Universit?t Hannover, Inst. f?r Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211
> Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de
> GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:12:34 -0600
> From: armdeveloper <armdeveloper@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: pcb vendor drill mapping not changing the
> report info ?
> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1185804754.19166.4.camel@zd7280>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 15:22 -0600, armdeveloper wrote:
>> I created a "vendor resource file" with the appropriate drill sizes in
>> it. I used the file format in the pcb help html page. I commented out
>> the skips and the DRC stuff from the example.
>>
>> I load the file from the command in the File menu. I believe I enabled
>> the use of the file with the command in the Settings menu. I applied
>> the vendor drill map with the command in the Connects menu.
>>
>> However, when I view the Drill Summary Report in the info window, it
>> doesn't show the holes being converted to the vendor sizes.
>
> This still doesn't work. Here is my vendor file.
>
> # Optional name of the vendor
> vendor = "APC"
>
> # units for dimensions in this file.
> # Allowed values: mil/inch/mm
> units = mil
>
> # drill table
> drillmap = {
> # When mapping drill sizes, select the nearest size
> # or always round up. Allowed values: up/nearest
> round = up
>
> # The list of vendor drill sizes. Units are as specified
> # above.
> 17
> 25
> 32
> 35
> 39
> 49
> 57
> 83
> 122
> 149
>
> # optional section for skipping mapping of certain elements
> # based on reference designator, value, or description
> # this is useful for critical parts where you may not
> # want to change the drill size. Note that the strings
> # are regular expressions.
> #skips = {
> # {refdes "^J3$"} # Skip J3.
> # {refdes "J3"} # Skip anything with J3 as part of the
> refdes.
> # {refdes "^U[1-3]$" "^X.*"} # Skip U1, U2, U3, and anything
> starting with X.
> # {value "^JOHNSTECH_.*"} # Skip all Johnstech footprints
> based on the value of a part.
> # {descr "^AMP_MICTOR_767054_1$"} # Skip based on the
> description.
> #}
> }
>
> # If specified, this section will change the current DRC
> # settings for the design. Units are as specified above.
> #drc = {
> # copper_space = 7
> # copper_width = 7
> # silk_width = 10
> # copper_overlap = 4
> #}
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:32:51 -0600
> From: armdeveloper <armdeveloper@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: gEDA-user: Second feature request for pcb...
> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1185805971.21378.1.camel@zd7280>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Another little feature I'd love to see added to pcb is the use of the
> ctrl button to add/remove one extra item to a selection.
>
> Lets say I want to select everything in a box except one component. I
> select the select tool and draw a box around what I want. How do I
> unselect the one item ? Maybe pcb has functionality for this already ?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:01:31 -0600
> From: armdeveloper <armdeveloper@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: pcb vendor drill mapping not changing the
> report info ?
> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1185807691.21378.3.camel@zd7280>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 15:22 -0600, armdeveloper wrote:
>> I created a "vendor resource file" with the appropriate drill sizes in
>> it. I used the file format in the pcb help html page. I commented out
>> the skips and the DRC stuff from the example.
>>
>> I load the file from the command in the File menu. I believe I enabled
>> the use of the file with the command in the Settings menu. I applied
>> the vendor drill map with the command in the Connects menu.
>>
>> However, when I view the Drill Summary Report in the info window, it
>> doesn't show the holes being converted to the vendor sizes.
>
> This still isn't working. I'd appreciate some input if you have any. I
> posted with my vendor file, but the post hasn't appeared yet.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:14:27 -0400
> From: "John Luciani" <jluciani@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: pcb vendor drill mapping not changing the
> report info ?
> To: "gEDA user mailing list" <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <608bfe540707300814g2c1ec967p4ad30d0f31301cbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 7/30/07, armdeveloper <armdeveloper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> This still isn't working. I'd appreciate some input if you have any. I
>> posted with my vendor file, but the post hasn't appeared yet.
>
> Your message with the vendor file appeared ~45 minutes ago.
>
> (* jcl *)
>
> --
> http://www.luciani.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>
>
> End of geda-user Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68
> *****************************************
>
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user