[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
gEDA-user: PCB: No vias under SMDs
- To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: gEDA-user: PCB: No vias under SMDs
- From: Christoph Lechner <cl0002@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:55:58 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 05:44:24 -0500
- Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Hello,
is it possible to tell the PCB auto-router that it should
not place any vias under SMDs. It would be very "nice",
because I usually make my prototype PCBs on my own. So as
my home made vias aren't flat (I drill a hole and solder
in a wire ...) the vias may not be under SMD devices.
Is it right that PCB uses a cost based auto-router, i.e.
one that adds a penality for each via, for the length of a
track etc.?
If yes, would it be possible to add a *very* high penality
for a via under a SMD device?
Because there are some PCB hackers out there, can you tell
me where to start? I got many years of C experience and so
maybe I can code a patch for this feature if you give me
some ideas ...
regards,
Christoph Lechner