[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Strange resistor footprints
It is definitely happening when I try to use a newlib footprint. I
solved my 603 problem, but I now have EIA3528 cap with the same issue.
The syntax being generated by gsch2pcb is very different. I can't see
any documentation in the PCB manual that shows
Element( ... ).fp(...)
type construction.
Oliver
__________________________________________________________________
From: Oliver King-Smith <oliverks1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 7:29:41 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Strange resistor footprints
It might help if I post more of the file
# element_flags, description, pcb-name, value, mark_x, mark_y,
# text_x, text_y, text_direction, text_scale, text_flags
Element[0x00000000 "" "" "" 0 0 -3150 -3150 0 100 ""]
(
#
# Pad[x1, y1, x2, y2, thickness, clearance, mask, name , pad number,
flags]
Pad[-2559 -492
-2559 492
2952 2000 3552 "1" "1" "square"]
Pad[2559 -492
2559 492
2952 2000 3552 "2" "2" "square"]
#
# This draws a 1 mil placement courtyard outline in silk. It should
probably
# not be included since you wont want to try and fab a 1 mil silk
line. Then
# again, it is most useful during parts placement. It really is time
for some
# additional non-fab layers...
# ElementLine[eval(-1*V1/2) eval(-1*V2/2) eval(-1*V1/2) eval(
V2/2) CYW]
# ElementLine[eval(-1*V1/2) eval(-1*V2/2) eval( V1/2)
eval(-1*V2/2) CYW]
# ElementLine[eval( V1/2) eval( V2/2) eval( V1/2)
eval(-1*V2/2) CYW]
# ElementLine[eval( V1/2) eval( V2/2) eval(-1*V1/2) eval(
V2/2) CYW]
).fp(0603.fp,R229,87K)
So for generating resistors, the gsch2pcb uses a different format
than
an IC with a footprint I have defined.
__________________________________________________________________
From: John Doty <[1]jpd@xxxxxxxxx>
To: [2]kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gEDA user mailing list
<[3]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 7:10:26 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Strange resistor footprints
On Feb 16, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>> T 50700 46500 5 10 1 1 90 0 1
>> precision=1%
>> }
>>
>> in the schematic. What am I doing wrong here?
>>
>
> A stab in the dark: Maybe, gnetlist is unhappy with the "%"
character.
I don't think so. Gnetlist doesn't care about "%": my schems are full
of attributes like "spec=1% 1/10W".
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
[1][4]http://www.noqsi.com/
[2][5]jpd@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[3][6]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[4][7]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
References
1. [8]http://www.noqsi.com/
2. mailto:[9]jpd@xxxxxxxxx
3. mailto:[10]geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4. [11]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
References
1. mailto:jpd@xxxxxxxxx
2. mailto:kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxx
3. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4. http://www.noqsi.com/
5. mailto:jpd@xxxxxxxxx
6. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
7. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
8. http://www.noqsi.com/
9. mailto:jpd@xxxxxxxxx
10. mailto:geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
11. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user