[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:33:28 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:34:12 -0500
In-reply-to: <20050109183013.GA3653@beton.cybernet.src> (message from Karel Kulhavy on Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:30:13 +0000)
References: <20050108171814.383A62AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <05E64872-6266-11D9-A4B3-003065D0A7C0@klebsch.de> <200501091825.j09IPl4s028651@envy.delorie.com> <20050109183013.GA3653@beton.cybernet.src>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> There is a mathematical reason to keep the number of libraries down ;-)

The usual assumption is that the reliability of a library is higher
than the reliability of the custom code it replaces, since there's
more projects discovering (and hopefully fixing) its bugs.

The real math is the probability that an incompatible version of that
library is installed on the user's system, causing install problems.

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
  - From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
  - From: Mario Klebsch
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Off-by-one display
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB suggestion
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread