[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:28:02 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:28:19 -0500
In-reply-to: <20060130172551.GA13118@lrd5-64> (message from Larry Doolittle on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:25:51 -0800)
References: <20060130165342.GD20584@li2-47.members.linode.com> <20060130171203.ACAB62AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <ad9f78230601300923v6db17cf7y1717358b9681503@mail.gmail.com> <20060130172551.GA13118@lrd5-64>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

> That just sounds weird.  Wouldn't it be be better to use the
> soldermask for this purpose?  There are many boards made with no
> silkscreen at all.

And BGAs often recommend mask-defined pads, which would require the
same sort of functionality from PCB.

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
  - From: Randall Nortman
- Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
  - From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
  - From: Matt Ettus
- Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
  - From: Larry Doolittle

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: pcb fab recommendations
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB doc on wiki (was RE: Vias with zero clearance in PCB?)
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Silkscreen over pads
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread