Re: gEDA-user: Toporouter Changes

[Anthony Blake <tonyb33@xxxxxxxxx>]

John Griessen wrote:
>   Seems like the force-field approach
>> just tweaks his "better" definition based on user input and not just the 
>> board geometrics.
> Right.  To move in one direction from a point that repels is one way to code such a function.
> Another would be a straight line, and even better, a hand drawn line-segment line
> carving out regions of circuitry that should stay some distance away from eachother.
> Then rerun the program with wider DRC rules for the next region to pack against the first. and so on.

I would prefer to implement this sort of functionality with topological 
directives or constraints, and avoid geometric constraints if possible.

Cheers,
Anthony


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user