On 3/11/07, al davis <ad136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 21:05, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> >Anyone who is thinking of improving a spice GUI has got to
> > try Linear Technology's free SwitcherCAD (aka ltspice).
> > It's the nicest spice I've ever used. It's a better
> > schematic entry program than most, too (and that would
> > include Eagle and gschem).
>
> Okay, I'm confused, why are you trying to use
> gschem/PCB then? Wouldn't it make sense to use SwitcherCAD
> (aka ltspice) instead? It does run under Windows and Linux
> (using wine).
Maybe he would rather use something that is truly-free, GPL?
Avoid proprietary lock-in?
Problem with most attempts on front-ending the command line simulators
is that they either cover only one simulator and implement the
post-processing sub-optimal. Even expencive EDA tools from Cadence et
al have sub-optimal simulator front ends. It is important to spend
time to get exhaustive input from the possible user base before the
first line of code is written as there is a huge permutation of
features that will be requested as people start to use such a
front-end.