[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: footpgen.py female headers implementation

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: footpgen.py female headers implementation
From: Levente Kovacs <leventelist@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:05:57 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 May 2009 04:06:25 -0400
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: logonex.eu
References: <20090430013917.060c0e0b.leventelist@xxxxxxxxx> <10f611330904291805o670bafc9ya4e6ea96c5cf5f3e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gtblkg$h93$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10f611330904301816o38324bcaq59f369b0425f4f44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:16:05 -0500
Darrell Harmon <dlharmon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I downloaded it to check it out, and it appears to be the latest. Is
> it a problem with the patches being applied correctly or are you
> getting an old file? Caching proxy?

Yes, I guess it was the proxy service in my dayjob to blame. It looks good
now.

-- 
Levente Kovacs
http://logonex.eu



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Prev by Author: gEDA-user: [OFF] high current amplifier
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Deafult gap between copper pin/pad and resist
Next by thread: gEDA-user: geda-devel archive
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread