[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Suggestion for gschem symbols

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Suggestion for gschem symbols
From: Werner Hoch <werner.ho@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:21:59 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:22:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <20051030102641.GA30321@kestrel>
References: <20051030102641.GA30321@kestrel>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8

Hi Karel,

On Sunday 30 October 2005 11:26, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> I know that capacitor-2.sym and capacitor-3.sym differ in how the
> numbers are assigned to the pins. I suggest each symbol to have a
> remark= or note= attribute whose content would be displayed together
> with the symbol shape preview.

We have a description and a comment attribute inside symbols. 
I agree that the description should be displayed.

capacitor-2 and capacitor-3 have visible pinnumbers in the CVS-Version.
Which additional Information would you suggest?

regards
Werner

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Suggestion for gschem symbols
  - From: Ales Hvezda

References:
- gEDA-user: Suggestion for gschem symbols
  - From: Karel Kulhavy

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: spice
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Clicking in gschem
Previous by thread: gEDA-user: Suggestion for gschem symbols
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Suggestion for gschem symbols
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread