[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
From: Rick Collins <erudite999@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:04:17 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:05:14 -0400
In-reply-to: <200810010459.m914x5IV011096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080928054401.GA31485@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080928134720.3ECDE1428D96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809282119.m8SLJ482023711@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080928220946.909FF14216D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809282306.m8SN6tC3026304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080930025543.210B4140E69A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809300331.m8U3VoBb003517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080930063821.44AB21421BAD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809301459.m8UExjUL018979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080930153215.B9CEC14247FB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E2FC69.5080401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081001044126.48E8A14260DB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810010459.m914x5IV011096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 12:59 AM 10/1/2008, you wrote:

> > Compatibility refers to multiple tools.  You know, like...
> > compatibility.  Does that really need explanation?
>
>Which tools?  You've given no examples of any tools that support
>IPC-2581.  Who will we be compatible with?

I didn't realize that you don't know anything about the standard.  It 
is new, it is actually undergoing revision, no one currently supports 
it and it is unlikely that anyone would support it until it is finished.


> > Since the largest tool vendors are on the committee that is creating
> > the standard, I don't see why it wouldn't be accepted in the end and
> > become a new industry standard.
>
>Like Microsoft and ISO?

How is this relevant?   



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: John Griessen
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: Rick Collins
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread