[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reimplementing code, was: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Reimplementing code, was: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:47:14 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:47:36 -0400
In-reply-to: <20050920174004.69FB92AA08@earl-grey.cloud9.net> (sdb@cloud9.net)
References: <20050920174004.69FB92AA08@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

As a side note, I hope one of the benefits of splitting the GUI from
the model in PCB will be that the code will be easier to understand,
and thus easier for people to join the development effort.

However, I will opine that PCB is the type of program that really
wants an object oriented programming language.  Having every action
know how to do every operation on every object type is just... wrong.

References:
- Re: Reimplementing code, was: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
  - From: Stuart Brorson

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics that should be avoided
Previous by thread: Re: Reimplementing code, was: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
Next by thread: Re: Reimplementing code, was: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread