[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Free Dog meeting report: Notes on the topics we discussed
> Now back to the original problem: two symbols identically
> named symbols will most likely not have identical signatures/hashes
> and it would be impossible for the wrong symbol to be silently
> netlisted.
>
> Comments on this idea?
I think it's a good idea. Could we somehow set up a directory priority
so far? That would help too.
Levente
--
E-Mail: levente.kovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
AIM: ha5ogl
ICQ: 48710903
MSN: ha5ogl@xxxxxxxxxxx
Yahoo!: kieg_tk16
Home Page: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs
Public key: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs/cuccok/public_key
________________________________________
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email & vCards
/ \ http://arc.pasp.de/
Have Fun, & Linux! 73 for all by HA5OGL.
This message was generated by Sylpheed.