Re: gEDA-user: two footprint generators on gedasymbols.org

[Dave N6NZ <n6nz@xxxxxxxx>]

DJ Delorie wrote:

> I never understood the need for pinseq.  What practical differences
> does your change make?

Eliminates illegal gaps in the pin sequence numbering.

>
> Consider adapting my dilpad generator to do through-hole with your
> logic.

I'll take a look at it.

> If we merge those, and make command-line variants of all
> three, I think we'd have a good set of utilities.
>
> That leaves sot-style and discrete components.

... and vacuum tube sockets ...

-dave


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user