gEDA-user: integration (was: PCB a bad name ?)

[John Griessen <john_g@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is partly an opinion difference about "what is best" and they are heading 
partly that way already.   If integration means "all from one GUI"  I don't see 
the value.  The active developers are getting good FOSS project results and that 
may never make a Windowsy looking "single tool".

They don't have a mission to make geda mainstream.

Do you really understand how few engineers are interested in going it as a small 
business?  It's way below one percent.
(Chime in with opinions here --  )

These tools are right for small business R&D, mostly D.

I think it would be most mind blowing to have FOSS that follows accounting 
practice better than gnucash and a good 2D scriptable parametric mechanical 
drafting FOSS to go along with the 2D circuit tools we have.

John G

Arthur Baldwin wrote:
I think there is a much more important way to increase interest in the entire 
gEDA project.

And that would be to focus on further integrating the modules


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user