[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Are some of our "standard" footprints tiny??

Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2008, 12:54 +0200 schrieb David Kuehling:
> > Are the CAPC*, and RES* footprints way too small?
> 
> CAPC0603 is *not* a 0603.  The CAPC* and RES* footprints use metric
> units, the CAPC0603 corresponds to a 0201 mil footprint.  For the 0603
> mil footprint use CAPC1608*.
> 
> See also the comments in /usr/share/pcb/m4/geda.inc 

This is really a serious trap.




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user