[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
From: John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 14:45:25 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:45:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <201009082037.o88KbnkD015698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <201009071601.o87G1nvL021315@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C86B372.1080002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTiny_u8BBxUvK4dJSTiQk81AmGOPN0fH7V2eFi59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C86DCDB.10307@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim6ic=PWCeLwNDMyah+4fotWfb3T5Qh+h-pLQ9Z@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009080050.o880oDRO002199@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DBE28A05-C594-4FE9-BE46-4903033DE371@xxxxxxxxx> <7401652465A13245B1C94ECDC9747C115A6F03AB35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7D37992D-475F-4F18-A4E5-C698FB12A465@xxxxxxxxx> <201009082037.o88KbnkD015698@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 8, 2010, at 2:37 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
>> Yes, but if you read the previous message, DJ assumed that "allows"
>> meant "requires".
> 
> To reiterate my position on that: I don't mind the "use a text editor"
> solution.  My concern is editing it *while* PCB is *also* editing it.

Sure. Don't do that. But don't put complex, fragile mechanisms into the code to prevent it (as RCS did). A simple mechanism to alert the user is better.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References:
- gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: Link
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: Mark Rages
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: Ethan Swint
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: timecop
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: David C. Kerber
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: John Doty
- Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: next PCB release - 1.99za vs 4.0
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread