[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Maximum flow bug

To: graphthing-discuss@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Maximum flow bug
From: David Symonds <dsymonds@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:08:35 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: graphthing-discuss-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: graphthing-discuss@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:14:32 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IPwf3Mbr8ur5TTfWeYQFyjDRDfR6rIQcTr0uUErAqV4=; b=Jzjg3qJ3dB6/rNsHr5MLmTfxno3a6mT2lQtkqd5TOEbjlc9mHf0bK+JUHiwbmkfC5u ycIPYBtcxmEHFChJys93EpRzUz5lSt8/SLr+USe2cabRBAKRNwj74OUjh6oZrMkvvSrd yWeXsf9iOJNIKReVM3A5K2pzcq93qfuOAQ2ZA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hF42oGg9H21BsdBLbW762zh7qsUniTTp0MGkch3Xn4E4kInl9h9C87akxzEE61H8zl AB5LbODY5iDvHl/vi7IYP1WubnD50AtctfGlQK9kbtFFJ7cforBHh9wSR1TPeUuSJXWo NQsOXUhzTQ6cXoA/75muZmEaIN/6zZaliUaG8=
In-reply-to: <bd30091c0906071321r7b9d83dbi2a1206aa949f95bc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <bd30091c0906071321r7b9d83dbi2a1206aa949f95bc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: graphthing-discuss@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-graphthing-discuss@xxxxxxxx

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Michael P<mich1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I believe there's a bug in the maximum flow calculation. I've attached a
> case that should reproduce it.

Thanks for your investigation, but GraphThing hasn't been developed or
maintained for a number of years. I'm glad you're still finding it
useful, though!

Dave.

References:
- Maximum flow bug
  - From: Michael P

Next by Author: Maximum flow bug
Previous by thread: Maximum flow bug
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread