[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libevent-users] [RFC] conditionalize INET6 code

To: libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Libevent-users] [RFC] conditionalize INET6 code
From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:59:23 +0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: libevent-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: libevent-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 02:59:31 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=S1X85n9VrXABwKnG0rYgwS1bSb/nUJnyeRkhid/AZcg=; b=KpWBno4QnagNaPaMwZh2ZmxLGlou3df6s1GAATQZuhUegfH9Wd20GLEVIsNXh0Rfpp JYGiMOdBw47iHyvVh+UtHaz2K9sAjceAUColN/eWGUN9EiHZwdY5i21qAqftuFjO/VG7 +ATAOWkIGAAJTg1RzFw+tDGuzBbfSxS54SpwvghdXpQgITgHxMKBNf680INNnHqB26nj CzGv8OnnAcIWeXq0+vapVTrl1rtrQ6eLCCV3CCHiD2dKnmRx5Ibbi+ZCEZx8ReWLas0q btBu0aIPzBeIjb6tIVRILTOlgiwmtc1yBVMvtJ6txV6uC3Q+bxcuwcjl/oA3J5c42CIs CG6g==
In-reply-to: <CAH=+dTSjgQq5UAGuH2tUULJnE+2JuBBhra+s=mMBjK7KS0eJbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAH=+dTSjgQq5UAGuH2tUULJnE+2JuBBhra+s=mMBjK7KS0eJbw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

But why do you need this?
You could you address hints instead.
(evdns, bufferevent have API for this, and for evhttp there are some patches for this already, but they are not merged yet)

On 30 Apr 2014 02:32, "Denis Zaitceff" <zaitceff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm thinking about.Â Any thoughts please, why it may be undiserable?
Thanks in advance.

References:
- [Libevent-users] [RFC] conditionalize INET6 code
  - From: Denis Zaitceff

Next by Author: [Libevent-users] libevent-2.1.4-alpha: implicit declaration of function 'SSL_set_tlsext_host_name'
Previous by thread: [Libevent-users] [RFC] conditionalize INET6 code
Next by thread: [Libevent-users] silly question: 1.x to 2.x event_add behavior
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread