[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[Libevent-users] RPC: patch for evrpc_free() and evrpc_unregister_rpc()
Hello all,
The following patch fixes incorrect assertions in evrpc_free():
evrpc_unregister_rpc() and evrpc_remove_hook() return 0 for success.
Also, in evrpc_unregister_rpc(), it is better to free RPC structure
at the end: evrpc_free() uses rpc->uri as "name" parameter when
calling evrpc_unregister_rpc(), then rpc->uri is freed, but we
have "registered_uri = evrpc_construct_uri(name)". So at this time
"name" is invalid.
Best regards,
Christophe
diff -ur libevent-2.0.10-stable/evrpc.c libevent-2.0.10-patch/evrpc.c
--- libevent-2.0.10-stable/evrpc.c 2011-02-25 16:25:50.466781289 +0100
+++ libevent-2.0.10-patch/evrpc.c 2011-02-28 10:46:19.854280129 +0100
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
while ((rpc = TAILQ_FIRST(&base->registered_rpcs)) != NULL) {
r = evrpc_unregister_rpc(base, rpc->uri);
- EVUTIL_ASSERT(r);
+ EVUTIL_ASSERT(r == 0);
}
while ((pause = TAILQ_FIRST(&base->paused_requests)) != NULL) {
TAILQ_REMOVE(&base->paused_requests, pause, next);
@@ -106,11 +106,11 @@
}
while ((hook = TAILQ_FIRST(&base->input_hooks)) != NULL) {
r = evrpc_remove_hook(base, EVRPC_INPUT, hook);
- EVUTIL_ASSERT(r);
+ EVUTIL_ASSERT(r == 0);
}
while ((hook = TAILQ_FIRST(&base->output_hooks)) != NULL) {
r = evrpc_remove_hook(base, EVRPC_OUTPUT, hook);
- EVUTIL_ASSERT(r);
+ EVUTIL_ASSERT(r == 0);
}
mm_free(base);
}
@@ -263,9 +263,6 @@
}
TAILQ_REMOVE(&base->registered_rpcs, rpc, next);
- mm_free((char *)rpc->uri);
- mm_free(rpc);
-
registered_uri = evrpc_construct_uri(name);
/* remove the http server callback */
@@ -273,6 +270,9 @@
EVUTIL_ASSERT(r == 0);
mm_free(registered_uri);
+
+ mm_free((char *)rpc->uri);
+ mm_free(rpc);
return (0);
}
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.