[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libevent-users] evhttp client error handling



Also on which operating system did you work?

Maybe this will be useful for you
http://instantbadger.blogspot.ru/2010/06/eafnosupport-socket-connection-issue-on.html

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Azat Khuzhin <dohardgopro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Pelletier
> <ppelletier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2012 06:48 AM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Patrick Pelletier
>>> <ppelletier@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ppelletier@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>     Not sure what the proper solution is for this, though.  I'm not
>>>     enough of a sockets expert.  Although I'm curious why we need to
>>>     create the socket before we've looked up the name.  If we looked up
>>>     the name first, then we could create the socket with the proper
>>>     address family in the first place.
>>>
>>>
>>> My first thought would be that binding before doing the name lookup
>>> isn't going to work: we need to find out what address family we're going
>>> to connect to before we can find out what address family we're going to
>>> bind to?
>>
>>
>> I definitely agree that is what ought to be happening.  Unfortunately, I'm
>> having trouble understanding the code well enough in order to submit a patch
>> to make it do that.
>>
>> Here's what I've figured out so far:
>>
>> * In http.c, evhttp_connection_connect_ calls bind_socket, which creates the
>> socket (with AF_INET, which is what we don't want).  The file descriptor is
>> stored in evcon->fd, and also stored in the bufferevent with
>> bufferevent_setfd.
>
> Hi, if I understand correct, "AF_INET" is not installed always.
>
> First "make_addrinfo()" is called in "bind_socket()" and installing "AF_UNSPEC"
> https://github.com/libevent/libevent/blob/0c2bacca43ffe452d4f5cdc4b57fd29a7795777d/http.c#L4057
>
> With means that and IPV4 and IPV6 is allowed.
>
> Than only if "ai" is NULL in "bind_socket_ai()", "AF_INET" is installed. in
> https://github.com/libevent/libevent/blob/0c2bacca43ffe452d4f5cdc4b57fd29a7795777d/http.c#L4018
>
> But "ai" can't be NULL in "bind_socket_ai()", see
> https://github.com/libevent/libevent/blob/0c2bacca43ffe452d4f5cdc4b57fd29a7795777d/http.c#L4088
>
>>
>> * Then, evhttp_connection_connect_ calls bufferevent_socket_connect_hostname
>>
>> * In bufferevent_sock.c, bufferevent_socket_connect_hostname calls
>> evutil_getaddrinfo_async_, with bufferevent_connect_getaddrinfo_cb as the
>> callback
>>
>> * bufferevent_connect_getaddrinfo_cb calls bufferevent_socket_connect
>>
>> * bufferevent_socket_connect checks if fd < 0, and calls evutil_socket to
>> create the socket if necessary
>>
>> So, at first glance, it seems like we could avoid creating the socket in
>> evhttp_connection_connect_, and just wait for bufferevent_socket_connect to
>> create the socket for us, after it has done the name lookup, and knows what
>> the proper address family is.
>>
>> The only potential problem seemed to be that the http code wants the file
>> descriptor in evcon->fd, in addition to being in the buffer event.
>>
>> So, I tried the following:
>>
>> * Commented out the lines from "bind_socket" through "bufferevent_setfd" in
>> evhttp_connection_connect_
>>
>> * In evhttp_error_cb (which seems to be a callback for more than just
>> errors), I added "evcon->fd = bufferevent_getfd(bufev);" in the (currently
>> empty) if branch for what == BEV_EVENT_CONNECTED, under the theory that this
>> would compensate for not having set evcon->fd in evhttp_connection_connect_
>>
>> However, when I did this, the tests failed horribly, so there's obviously
>> something I don't understand about what's happening and the order in which
>> it needs to happen.
>>
>>
>>> Or alternatively, if we have already bound to a socket, we need to limit
>>> our name lookup to the address family we bound to.  If we've bound to
>>> 127.0.0.1, there's no point in doing an AF_UNSPEC name lookup -- we can
>>> only connect to AF_INET addresses in that case.
>>
>>
>> That's a potential workaround that would allow localhost (or any dual-stack
>> host) to work, but it would still mean that evhttp client connections are
>> always IPv4-only, and wouldn't work with IPv6-only hosts.  So it's better
>> than the current situation, but not entirely satisfying.
>>
>>
>> --Patrick
>>
>> ***********************************************************************
>> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
>> unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.
>
>
>
> --
> Azat Khuzhin



-- 
Azat Khuzhin
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.