Re: [Libevent-users] bufferevent with custom IO

[Joachim Bauch <jojo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10.09.2012 18:32, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> On 10.09.2012 16:51, Nick Mathewson wrote:
[...]
>> I'd like a better distinction between functions that should be called
>> by the implementation, and functions that exist to be called by the
>> users of this type.  Right now I am pretty sure which are which, but
>> only pretty sure.
> 
> How would you like to separate this? Would a dedicated prefix/suffix
> for methods to be used by the implementation work?
> 
>> It could be cool to have a way to version the API.
> 
> I see, we could add a field to the "bufferevent_indirect_callbacks"
> that specifies the version number or a bitmask of the available
> features.
> 
>> I'm also with Mark Ellzey in that I'd like to see a quick example of
>> how this would get used (that is to say, a little example module).
> 
> Here is a quick-hacked pseudo-code example of how this could be used:
> https://gist.github.com/3691934

did anybody have a change to take a look yet? I wouldn't want to waste
development effort by starting completely without any feedback...

Best regards,
  Joachim

***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.