[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how to add assembler?
----- Original Message -----
From: Erik <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 1999 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: how to add assembler?
> but games like starcraft represent a 3d world, so it should be fairly easy
> do in true 3d, using opengl. It'd simplify things like faking altitude and
> drawing by altitude so tanks don't appear over battlecruisers.
Every so often someone writes something like this and it makes my blood
boil. Not to single you out Erik, because I see this a lot, both explicit
There is NOTHING easy about a commercial game. Period. And, while on the
surface, your statement makes sense, let me tell you that to do a game like
StarCraft in 3D would be MUCH more complicated than to do it in 2D.
Because expectations would be higher. In a 2D game, you can get away with a
single fixed light source, occasional graphics glitches (drawing order
problems), and minimal effects. In a 3D game you HAVE to do colored
lighting, you HAVE to support full translucency, you HAVE to have killer
special effects, or you don't have a successful commercial game. And even if
you don't tell anyone it's 3D, they'll know; you can't get the polygon count
high enough for the models to have truly rounded edges like you can when you
render for a 2D game. So you have to make up for the lower polygon count by
having such dazzling special effects that the gamer doesn't notice the
I don't mean to jump down anyone's throat, but being a former commercial
game developer, I feel the game developer's pains when someone says "why
didn't you *just* do <feature X>?", knowing that <feature X>, while on the
surface simple, probably means 6 person-months of work.
Director, Software Development