[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VA Pics

To: linuxkb-list@seul.org
Subject: Re: VA Pics
From: Jason Pincin <jpincin@ashtech.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 21:08:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <368ADADB.E726D509@cyberis.net>; from Micah Yoder on Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 06:00:59PM -0800
References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812301647480.6329-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> <368ADADB.E726D509@cyberis.net>
Reply-To: linuxkb-list@seul.org
Sender: owner-linuxkb-list@seul.org

> And it's generally recommended that servers have a /tmp.  My server has
> 2 9Gig drives (no RAID) and I have a 200MB /tmp.  (Of course, not much
> is used most of the time.)

Hm.  In my latest proposal (actually in both) /tmp will be hangin off the
/ partition.  384MB is VERY plenty... but /tmp partition wouldn't be a
*bad* idea.  If so I'd dropy / back to 256MB or so and skim 64MB or so
from elsewhere and set up a 192MB partition.

When you break partitions out like this your allowing for more flexibility
and easier upgrades down the road... but getting the right allocations is
tricky...

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VA Pics
  - From: "Aaron D. Turner" <aturner@best.com>
- / partition
  - From: "Aaron D. Turner" <aturner@best.com>

References:
- Re: VA Pics
  - From: "Aaron D. Turner" <aturner@best.com>
- Re: VA Pics
  - From: Micah Yoder <LYoder@cyberis.net>

Prev by Date: Re: VA Pics
Next by Date: Kernel
Prev by thread: Re: VA Pics
Next by thread: Re: VA Pics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread