Re: Entry Authentication

["Aaron D. Turner" <aturner@best.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Ah, I get it.  We'll then if Apache can't solve it behind the scenes for
us like I had hoped with this solution, then it doesn't solve anything.
Like someone said there's the DB sync issues which should be easy to
solve, though if it doesn't buy us anything then what's the point?

Unless anyone sees a true benifit to do it this way, I say we just say
forget it and concentrate or limited resources to more productive issues.


- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
aturner@pobox.com      | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8


On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Daniel E. Markle wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 11:44:37AM -0800, Aaron D. Turner wrote:
> > That doesn't work.  Too many people put fake contact info (name, email) in
> > their browser config for security reasons.  Sounds like we'll need to do
> 
> You misunderstand me.  We have to send a basic authentification request,
> and the browser answers with username and password.  Then we have to check
> the username and password ourselves or using system calls in our script.
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> -------------------
> Daniel E. Markle
> syntax@ashtech.net
> 
> Linux - The OS of the future.
> Windows - Still using that legacy OS?
> -------------------
> 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNqY2bTM3jpXy1kJtAQHuPQP9FEwsTXtHTP5ZE5PkgahBRxIhgDBUe91h
oVe6o5njzEd8BhIcaGn4rbipHhI3NrPU/noL3K/QgpuNdYdcMgGjXmliOfCaSyNZ
Cxgt74f2bMWX0v+nvPgDKdt6A8CkQ9SF093b00ITP6dNJ3oYq7ACfzR4iC62pb+c
jx8nJ4XncKE=
=izzm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----