Re: Authentification Rambling Continued

["Aaron D. Turner" <aturner@best.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


One question: 

Do we care if someone steals a password via a sniffer and is now able to
submit bogus entries?

I don't see this info important enough to warrent the SSL overhead.  
We're not talking about credit card #'s here.  If you're worried *that*
much about the quality of the information provided here that someone might
do this, then you're more paranoid that even I am! :-)


- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
aturner@pobox.com      | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8


On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Daniel E. Markle wrote:

> ...of course, that won't matter if we where using https anyway, which we need
> to decide upon as yet.  I will continue researching.
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> -------------------
> Daniel E. Markle
> syntax@ashtech.net
> 
> Linux - The OS of the future.
> Windows - Still using that legacy OS?
> -------------------
> 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNqY8mzM3jpXy1kJtAQEJVgQAjcjbvyWe/3DayRnRZvEXBVVgf0B045yX
gnjdzzwaPaq+o9cdUwExYrctbeWJh1HRZfxBGo3+ADqKonNeYQW79NJ6IwWSV+4m
nLe0FUwvMPHh4A2O6DkL9QQu+uiqhx5b5FL1MjRUDt+peVrSJCxj26ZgS9DXjEhU
W9hM/CUlSIo=
=UYDc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----