[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Entry Authentication
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm not aware of the security risk, however that is a far cry from saying
that it's OK to do so. Anyone know for sure? If not I know a few places
to ask.
- --
Aaron Turner | Either which way, one half dozen or another.
aturner@pobox.com | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed. Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80 59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Daniel E. Markle wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 12:26:13PM -0800, Aaron D. Turner wrote:
> > there. Security is equal either way. You can put the cgi's in another
> > directory that is htpasswd protected.
>
> I thought putting CGI's in any directory under the document root was a major
> security risk? If it can be done, though, basic authentification will work
> for us with no extra effort.
>
> --
>
>
> -------------------
> Daniel E. Markle
> syntax@ashtech.net
>
> Linux - The OS of the future.
> Windows - Still using that legacy OS?
> -------------------
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBNqY+jDM3jpXy1kJtAQGk3wP9HsKYf6PJFgXOmtNnBiPHaI1v/jPD94ZT
0wIXikWHDKodj8mu2Hnhm9xwGlVDf10Zr9+VvUMjyrnivdTqmD1s2NNbiDBf9get
ZFXAs+14RWG4SeKbKY5hJnP6iCBxati8Q/cG6eDSKIvNuvsdtkTDODS7zam6ZhS6
upxuXeHu8JM=
=fHyg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----