[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initial layout
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:04:02PM -0500, Cabenoist1130@cs.com wrote:
> The real reason for this email was to talk about whether or not char(30) on the Article Name field would be long enough. I think that we might want it to be much longer. I was thinking more along the lines of 100 to 150. This is just in case someone has a long title for an article. We do not want to cut it off. Our search would hurt if we did that. What do you think?
30 probably is way too small, but we want to keep this size limited to keep
the article names short and concise, IMHO. Our other option is to use a text
field so they can make it any size they want. Do we want article names that
are more than a line or two long?
--
-------------------
Daniel E. Markle
syntax@ashtech.net
http://www.ashtech.net/syntax
-------------------