Re: Resultset Object

[Robert Myers <ccrider@whiterose.net>]

Let's just leave it. :)

It works fine now, and we can always change it after the go-live date.



-Bob 
ccrider@whiterose.net
Systems Administrator for whiterose.net
http://www.whiterose.net

On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Daniel E. Markle wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 10:59:03AM -0400, Jason Pincin wrote:
> > Damn... now I'm getting confused :).  Whatever it is called now is what we were
> > planning on keeping it unles someone thinks another name makes more sense.  Lemme
> 
> It is resultset now, which you said made no sense for anything but SELECTs.
> You had said about changing it to recordset since that made more sense for all
> SQL statements.  I would have to agree.  It doesn't really matter, though, as
> long as you don't change it later.
> 
> -- 
> -------------------
> Daniel E. Markle
> syntax@ashtech.net
> -------------------
>