[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What about non-DB articles?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Micah Yoder wrote:

> "Aaron D. Turner" wrote:
> 
> > Question for everyone, what are we going do regarding non-DB articles.
> > Things like
> > 
> > LDP
> > OSS Web Pages on line (Apache SAMBA, etc)
> > man pages (we can use man2html for this)
> > /usr/doc (we can use text2html for this)
> 
> Is this stuff *really* necessary?  There are plenty of other ways to
> search
> this stuff.  KDE and GNOME implement local doc searching (I think...)

I think it is.  Many people (newbies) don't know about man pages, or the
included docs.  Besides, why force people to search man pages, /usr/doc,
etc on their own when we can do it for them just as easily?
 
> We probably shouldn't worry about it until our main site is live.

/usr/doc and man pages are too easy to do to ignore IMHO.

> > One thing that I definately want to do for the LDP is clean it up.
> > Basically do a search at linuxkb.cheek.com or LinuxCare on something you
> > know to be in the LDP.  "DNS" is good.  You'll get over 10 hits for the
> > DNS-HOWTO because you have an index page, and a bunch of sub-page- each
> > one generates a hit.  Pain in the arse for the user.  What we need to do
> > is put all the pages in one page, so they only get one hit for the DNS
> > HOWTO.
> 
> Thought here:  When you search for a word in the LDP, you get a list of
> HOWTOs where your search was found.  Under that, you get a list of all
> the sections and subsections that match your search.  Sort of a drill
> down thing like our DB search page.  I'm not sure how easy that would be
> to implement.

Problem is that you have 10+1 pages of content (10 sub sections + 1 index
page).  So how to do you get 10+1 pages of content to return only the
index page?  The only way to do what you propose is not index the sub
sections, only the index page, which leaves out a lot of words to match
against.

If you have an idea how to impliment it though, I'd be interested to hear-
I like your idea the best.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNvHABTM3jpXy1kJtAQHJYgP9FEeOqYaJk02KBh08snJzwfrkLjniZg1M
FCo/+aH1N9e2hGeESf6N6DTH0S56zSRmaz41FApvpF4xSQXv10I5eqns9ufHE7ap
wXnBfXrgy74wOsWsa5JOCOK5yvjdj43y11p6ZGiJeHF/nsTkaFYhI+Yxfr5AQG9r
TdzrA0Cn1DY=
=gFmI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----