[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Related Links

To: linuxkb-list@seul.org
Subject: Re: Related Links
From: Jason Pincin <jpincin@ashtech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 23:24:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <37479EF9.CCB38AB@cyberis.net>; from Micah Yoder on Sat, May 22, 1999 at 11:23:53PM -0700
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990523013018.19681H-100000@whiterose.net> <37479EF9.CCB38AB@cyberis.net>
Reply-To: linuxkb-list@seul.org
Sender: owner-linuxkb-list@seul.org

> Maybe, but is there a real disadvantage to displaying all of them?  If
> they hit a "related links" page, it will hit the DB with the same query
> all over again.  The query you have on the article page will already
> fetch all the related links.  The only additional resource you'd be
> using by showing them all is more bandwidth, which is negligible unless
> it has like over 50 links.

Doesn't hafta hit the DB twice.

You can pass it in to the related links page from the articles page.

Jason

References:
- Re: Related Links
  - From: Robert Myers <ccrider@whiterose.net>
- Re: Related Links
  - From: Micah Yoder <LYoder@cyberis.net>

Prev by Date: Re: FW: This is kewl
Next by Date: Re: "Did this help?"
Prev by thread: Re: Related Links
Next by thread: PHP 3.0.8 Released
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread