[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Domain and Linux BF



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, Roger Dingledine wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811011610140.28941-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>,
>  aturner@best.com writes:
> >> > linuxkb.org
> >> 
> >> .net!  org is taken...  That's my vote.  It says what we are and is
> >> fairly easy to remember once you associate kb with knowledge base, is
> >> not too long.  But I guess we can do a majority rule here....
> 
> I mailed to the guy who owns linuxkb.org. I'll let you know if/when he
> responds.

Should be interesting to see what happens.

 
> >The problem I see is with the "kb".  I asked a number of people at work
> >what "kb" stands for and 4 out of 4 people said "kilobyte" or "kilobit".  
> >One of those asked frequently uses the Microsoft Knowledge Base.  
> 
> Woah. That's hardly a fair survey. :) If you'd asked them what "linux KB"
> stood for, I bet you would hear a lot fewer "linux kilobyte" responses.
> And if you'd said "linuxkb..you know, for answering questions" you would
> have gotten an even better response.

I agree have to agree that it was less than fair.  The point is people
should know what "kb" means.  People just don't assocaite kb with
knowledge base.

> >The fact that we are a "knowledge base" rather than a FAQ, or Q&A site, or
> >whatever is non-relevant technical jargon.  We are a support site- a place
> >people come for answers.
> 
> But this is very true. 
> 
> >What I'm saying is if you're a newbie looking for answers about Linux and
> >you go to a Yahoo and it comes back with two hits:
> >
> >www.linuxsupport.net
> >
> >and
> >
> >www.linuxkb.net
> >
> >Which one are you going to choose?  Which one more clearly expresses what
> >the site is about?  Does either one require previous knowledge to
> >understand what the domain means, or is the domain name meaningful in a
> >vacuum?
> 
> Why are we aiming for .net here? Because it's a place, not an organization?

linuxsupport.com was taken as was linuxkb.org.  Hence using net for both
made sense.  Also .net just sounds cool. :-)

> >Vote tally:
> >linuxkb.net 1
> >linuxsupport.net 1
> 
> What are our goals here? To provide answers to frequently asked questions
> in a convenient and fast format? Or to allow people to go and ask their
> questions, and then give them personal responses, similar to what
> http://www.ch4549.org/lust/ tries to do?

My vision is more broad than either of those:

Where people go first when they are looking for answers for Linux related
questions.

FAQ's will be a big part of this.  So will be intelligently indexing much
of the existing Linux content- something that the major search engines
have failed to do sucessfully.  I'd like to have unique content (FAQ
entries) generated from (forward via email) newsgroups and maillists.  As
well as a message board, ala Ask Slashdot.

Basically:

1) Mirroring/linking existing quality content on the web (LDP, Red Hat
Errata Pages, IP Masqurade homepage, etc)

2) Unique content generated by visitors to the site (people fill out a
form or via message boards)

3) Unique content from newsgroups and mail lists.

4) #1-3 powered by a powerful fuzzy logic search engine

5) Linux BF

I don't intend on having a bunch of people authorized by our site to take
questions and answer them.  I expect we will allow people to ask
questions, which we will then post and allow other visitors to answer.
The content maintainers will then pick good answers for inclusion to the
FAQ area/search engine of the site.

> I think we'd be misleading people if we went with linuxsupport.

Like I said earlier, we are a support site- a place people come looking
for answers about Linux.  linuxsupport to me says exactly that.  Do you
have perhaps a better suggestion- one that isn't misleading to you?

- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
aturner@pobox.com      | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNj4fGjM3jpXy1kJtAQGl/gQAnVui7ekzzAy6tdLryKT8IJFbzKdB/LyW
Uqw1Zrk48GZUsnfcOuvoQxsvcL/I4oCAmMANNABo9NEeoBhvImmOo3S+E/ODdOG/
BBxvLYzvptP7YcpfommJmawY+nugcFWgJJNifB/6ZexMjgN0Q0vkfYKNVhTToO7F
bXGZY6OoFqI=
=P7e8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----