Re: Thoughts on the remailer network

[Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>]

Thanks for joining the list, Len. I think things are moving forward
nicely.

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:44:09PM -0700, Len Sassaman wrote:
> That is certainly a possibility. At this point, I think we would want
> three documents: a paper describing the message format and low-level wire
> protocols, a paper describing proper behavior of a mix node, and a paper
> describing the proper and possible behavior of a nym server.

Gosh. That's a lot of documents. The one I'm working on right now is
none of those -- but it will be the best format for peer review from
the crypto researcher community.

So I'm going to keep my tunnel vision for a while and get this first
step done, so we can move forward with a solid foundation.

(Were you volunteering to work on those other papers, Len? :) I want to
make sure we avoid mapping out our path without having anybody actually
still wanting to do stuff.)

--Roger