[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question: IP blacklists / whitelists?
- To: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Question: IP blacklists / whitelists?
- From: "Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:21:33 -0500
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mixminion-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:21:42 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jt/WkM1u3ODNzGhwLIvGEueWo9y57TYfMKLByJyIj8U=; b=qvpDF2J/8PwrzhfZ4Mm6EEmJJfvniwtazIkb/9zYhsp/Xg9Wu67O3aqSiwxdZrCX9YncRpCrsTBGZVbB+a6VrUkbnMNncWQmTUPV/8FZ1VfzUdyqFrL/4l/zW0xCN13Rsts+mRvttzWFM/nRLuO8hkhIy5zVECd4JINQpmj1MOA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Et10DJlAoUVXCMdL6v+XoeZncWMwdKV72e+/E6JG+0AwF7VKwDxcgE2zKvA1EmYFgAVr46y+3PA2uSJl4zk0JLbpHsN/yLdE9+EOPHk+7uF2Pksi66LprX0dqyKOAjEpCTHdkGfEmo+WsVCc+ZpsbmiA8ILyJ1cv5Xd73RqE1og=
- In-reply-to: <7ee34d81493dece593c73467f006fefb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <7ee34d81493dece593c73467f006fefb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 13, 2007 4:22 AM, <tainaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> Any thoughts about how this would affect overall usability of the
> mixminion network? Any other comments?
I have no comments on the general idea, however if you take this
approach you should probably also blacklist any IP which is inside
your jurisdiction. If there is only a single logging node in a path
security is not compromised much.
You could use one of the available geoip databases to get a pretty
good guess at where various IPs are located.