[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #2671 [Company]: Better communication for authority operators, core developers in emergency situations
#2671: Better communication for authority operators, core developers in emergency
situations
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner: nickm
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Company | Version:
Keywords: | Parent: #2664
Points: | Actualpoints:
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Comment(by arma):
Replying to [comment:12 nickm]:
> Replying to [comment:11 rransom]:
> > Replying to [comment:10 nickm]:
> >
> > > - ALL DISCUSSIONS OF EACH ISSUE SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC WHEN WE PATCH
AND ANNOUNCE. We should use this as a means to become more transparent in
how we handle vulnerability reports.
> >
> > Trac is the wrong tool for publishing an archive of previous
discussions.
>
> Right; I wasn't meaning to suggest trac.
If our goal is to publish the svn directory afterwards, that means either
a) the discussion should happen in svn, not in email; or b) we should
stick the email thread into svn as one of our last acts.
On the theory of "don't introduce extra steps that might require thinking,
especially if the steps would be done after the issue is finished", I
think 'a' will be more robust.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2671#comment:13>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs