[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #3009 [Tor bundles/installation]: Polipo is included (yet should not be?) in TBB 2.2.24-1 alpha (Windows)
#3009: Polipo is included (yet should not be?) in TBB 2.2.24-1 alpha (Windows)
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: HG2G | Owner: erinn
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Tor bundles/installation | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment(by HG2G):
Hello Robert,
Replying to [comment:2 rransom]:
> Replying to [ticket:3009 HG2G]:
>
>
>
> > Privoxy is included in TBB 2.2.24-1 alpha for Windows even though
Privoxy is not needed. I tested setting !TorButton to 'custom' with only
SOCKS proxy set*, thus bypassing Privoxy, and TBB passed all 'Tor checks'
(e.g., https://check.torproject.org). Using DNSEye there are no DNS leaks
and I did not have any timeout erros when only using SOCKS proxy setting
in Firefox.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Unchecking the âUse Polipoâ checkbox in Torbutton's âPreferencesâ dialog
is easier.
>
> We aren't worried about DNS leaks anymore -- Polipo has been included in
the recent non-alpha releases purely in order to work around a hard-coded
timeout in Firefox's SOCKS client support.
>
Yup, uncheckable "Use Polipo" and then checking "Use Custom Proxy
Settings" is easier, but I wanted to test TBB from 1st start-up without
using Polipo and Polipo settings. I realize DNS leaks were not an issue
when using Polipo re its correct socks 5 code and Firefox 'not doing DNS
lookups locally' (i.e., !TorButton configuration of
''user_pref("network.proxy.socks_remote_dns", true);''. However, I wanted
to check and ensure the new socks patch for Firefox 4 in TBB 2.2.24-1
alpha was working as expected (that is, handling DNS properly).
> > Testing TBB 2.2.24-1 alpha (Firefox) page load speed with !FireBug and
!HammerHead showed faster page load times without Privoxy vs with Privoxy
for https://torproject.org, [https://blog.torproject.org/
https://blog.torproject.org] and
http://kpvz7ki2v5agwt35.onion/wiki/index.php/Main_Page.
> >
> >
> >
>
> But since you could browse to a hidden service, it's likely that the
copy of Firefox in that TBB is patched to fix the SOCKS timeout bug (as it
should be), so Polipo ''is'' unnecessary.
Yup, that was my point for posting this report, but I didn't want to be
too presumptuous and state for a fact Polipo should not be included (after
all, I am just some random person, no one of import to the Tor Project). I
asked Erinn about this a (few?) weeks ago, re whether the socks patch will
be included in the new Tor Project fork of FF 4 with new TBB version(s),
and she told me yes, the patch will be included. I agree Polipo should not
be included in new TBBs (with FF 4) any longer, but I didn't want to
overstep my bounds considering I am a nobody to the Tor project.
P.S. Thanks for fixing the title.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3009#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs