[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #15482 [Tor]: Don't surprise users with new circuits in the middle of browsing

#15482: Don't surprise users with new circuits in the middle of browsing
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
     Reporter:           |      Owner:  mikeperry
  mikeperry              |     Status:  needs_information
         Type:           |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.7.x-final
  enhancement            |    Version:
     Priority:  normal   |   Keywords:  tbb-usability, MikePerry201503,
    Component:  Tor      |  tbb-wants, TorBrowserTeam201504
   Resolution:           |  Parent ID:
Actual Points:           |
       Points:           |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by intrigeri):

 Replying to [comment:11 mikeperry]:
 > I decided to create a SocksAuthCircuitRenewPeriod torrc option that
 governs how long we extend the lifetime of socksauth-isolated circuits
 each time a new stream arrives on them.

 Would it be an option to allow users to set this with a per-SOCKSPort
 flag, instead of a global torrc option? E.g. Tails has a dedicated
 SOCKSPort for Tor Browser, and I would feel slightly more comfortable
 enabling this longer circuit lifetime for that port only, and leaving the
 default untouched for other applications: my gut feeling is that other
 applications using SOCKS u+p may have different needs, and might be
 negatively impacted by longer circuit lifetime (be it in terms of
 functionality, UX, or anonymity).

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/15482#comment:16>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs