[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #3723 [Core Tor/Tor]: Report version of bwscanners in votes
#3723: Report version of bwscanners in votes
--------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: mikeperry | Owner: (none)
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: unspecified
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: #13630 | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------------+----------------------------------
Comment (by teor):
This is about the format of the *vote* line, not the format of the
v3bwfile header, which is multiple lines.
Replying to [comment:8 teor]:
> Hi juga, this is the ticket for putting the bandwidth authority version
in votes.
>
> We are working on the file format in #25869 and
https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/4
>
> I think we should:
> 1. add a "timestamp=" to the timestamp
> 2. turn the entire bwfile header into a single line
> 3. put it all in the vote as a line with a new keyword, "bandwidth-file"
>
> For bandwidth file format 1.0.0, the line would be:
> bandwidth-file timestamp=1234567890
>
> For bandwidth file format 1.1.0, the line would be:
> bandwidth-file timestamp=1234567890 version=1.1.0 software=sbws
software_version=0.1.0
>
> If we implement the feature in this way, then Tor will automatically add
new fields to the bandwidth-file line.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3723#comment:9>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs